SEC 捍衛 Ripple 訴訟中簡要證據的可採性

在正在進行的 XRP 訴訟中，SEC 駁回了 Ripple Labs 駁回 SEC 總結證人 Andrea Fox 聲明的動議。該機構聲稱，根據聯邦法律，福克斯的證詞可以作為簡要證據，並不需要像 Ripple 所說的那樣需要專家披露。美國證券交易委員會認為，該聲明是根據 Ripple 的財務記錄進行算術計算的直接彙編，而不是專家意見。

SEC Defends Admissibility of Summary Evidence in Ripple Lawsuit

SEC 捍衛 Ripple 訴訟中簡要證據的可採性

In the ongoing legal battle between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple Labs, the SEC has filed a motion arguing that the declaration of summary witness Andrea Fox is admissible as evidence. Ripple had previously filed a motion to strike the declaration, alleging that it constituted undisclosed expert testimony.

在美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 和 Ripple Labs 之間正在進行的法律鬥爭中，SEC 已提出一項動議，認為簡易證人 Andrea Fox 的聲明可以作為證據。 Ripple 先前曾提出動議，要求撤銷該聲明，聲稱該聲明構成未公開的專家證詞。

The SEC counters Ripple's argument by asserting that the Fox Declaration is a permissible form of summary evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 1006. This rule allows for the introduction of evidence that summarizes voluminous or complex data, thereby assisting the court in its decision-making process.

SEC 反駁了 Ripple 的論點，聲稱福克斯聲明是聯邦證據規則 1006 允許的簡要證據形式。

According to the SEC, the Fox Declaration simply provides straightforward arithmetic calculations based on Ripple's financial records. It does not rely on any specialized expertise or render any opinions, making it distinguishable from expert testimony.

根據 SEC 的說法，福克斯聲明只是根據 Ripple 的財務記錄提供了簡單的算術計算。它不依賴任何專業知識或提出任何意見，使其與專家證詞區分開來。

In its motion, the SEC emphasizes that Ripple has not disputed the accuracy of Fox's calculations or the underlying financial data. The commission argues that the Fox Declaration merely streamlines the voluminous financial information for the court's convenience, without introducing any expert judgment or specialized knowledge.

美國證券交易委員會在其動議中強調，Ripple 並未對 Fox 計算或基礎財務數據的準確性提出異議。該委員會認為，《福斯宣言》只是為了法院的方便而精簡了大量的財務訊息，沒有引入任何專家判斷或專業知識。

The SEC also addressed Ripple's allegations that Fox's work involved interpretation of financial records and decision-making about the categorization of expenses and revenues. The SEC argues that this is a standard procedure for any summary witness who must review and form understandings of extensive data.

SEC 也回應了 Ripple 的指控，即 Fox 的工作涉及財務記錄的解釋以及有關費用和收入分類的決策。 SEC 認為，對於任何必須審查大量數據並形成理解的摘要證人來說，這是一個標準程序。

Citing legal precedents, the SEC maintains that summary witnesses may make assumptions based on the data they are summarizing, as long as those assumptions are disclosed and reasonably drawn from the data. The SEC argues that Fox's assumptions meet these criteria and do not convert the summary evidence into expert testimony.

美國證券交易委員會援引法律先例，認為摘要證人可以根據他們總結的數據做出假設，只要這些假設被披露並合理地從數據中得出。 SEC 認為福克斯的假設符合這些標準，並且沒有將摘要證據轉化為專家證詞。

In addition to defending the admissibility of the Fox Declaration on evidentiary grounds, the SEC also rebuts Ripple's procedural challenges. The SEC clarifies that Fox does not meet the definition of an expert witness under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) because she does not provide specialized knowledge or opinions.

除了以證據為依據捍衛《福克斯聲明》的可接受性之外，SEC 還反駁了 Ripple 的程序挑戰。 SEC 澄清，Fox 不符合《聯邦民事訴訟規則》第 26(a)(2) 條中專家證人的定義，因為她不提供專業知識或意見。

The SEC's motion underscores its position that the Fox Declaration is a permissible form of evidence that will assist the court in understanding the complex financial data relevant to the case. The motion also highlights the SEC's ongoing efforts to adhere to procedural requirements and present a comprehensive case against Ripple Labs.

美國證券交易委員會的動議強調了其立場，即福克斯聲明是一種允許的證據形式，將有助於法院理解與案件相關的複雜財務數據。該動議還強調了 SEC 為遵守程序要求所做的持續努力，並針對 Ripple Labs 提出了全面的案例。

As the lawsuit progresses, legal experts speculate on the potential implications of the SEC's motion on the outcome of the case. While the court's ultimate decision remains uncertain, the SEC's arguments provide a strong defense for the admissibility of summary evidence in complex financial litigation.

隨著訴訟的進展，法律專家猜測 SEC 動議對案件結果的潛在影響。儘管法院的最終裁決仍不確定，但 SEC 的論點為複雜金融訴訟中簡易證據的可採性提供了強有力的辯護。