SEC 捍卫 Ripple 诉讼中简要证据的可采性

在正在进行的 XRP 诉讼中，SEC 驳回了 Ripple Labs 驳回 SEC 总结证人 Andrea Fox 声明的动议。该机构声称，根据联邦法律，福克斯的证词可以作为简要证据，并不需要像 Ripple 所说的那样需要专家披露。美国证券交易委员会认为，该声明是根据 Ripple 的财务记录进行算术计算的直接汇编，而不是专家意见。

SEC Defends Admissibility of Summary Evidence in Ripple Lawsuit

SEC 捍卫 Ripple 诉讼中简要证据的可采性

In the ongoing legal battle between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple Labs, the SEC has filed a motion arguing that the declaration of summary witness Andrea Fox is admissible as evidence. Ripple had previously filed a motion to strike the declaration, alleging that it constituted undisclosed expert testimony.

在美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 和 Ripple Labs 之间正在进行的法律斗争中，SEC 已提出一项动议，认为简易证人 Andrea Fox 的声明可以作为证据。 Ripple 此前曾提出动议，要求撤销该声明，声称该声明构成未公开的专家证词。

The SEC counters Ripple's argument by asserting that the Fox Declaration is a permissible form of summary evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 1006. This rule allows for the introduction of evidence that summarizes voluminous or complex data, thereby assisting the court in its decision-making process.

SEC 反驳了 Ripple 的论点，声称福克斯声明是联邦证据规则 1006 允许的简要证据形式。该规则允许引入总结大量或复杂数据的证据，从而协助法院的决策过程。

According to the SEC, the Fox Declaration simply provides straightforward arithmetic calculations based on Ripple's financial records. It does not rely on any specialized expertise or render any opinions, making it distinguishable from expert testimony.

根据 SEC 的说法，福克斯声明只是根据 Ripple 的财务记录提供了简单的算术计算。它不依赖任何专业知识或提出任何意见，使其与专家证词区分开来。

In its motion, the SEC emphasizes that Ripple has not disputed the accuracy of Fox's calculations or the underlying financial data. The commission argues that the Fox Declaration merely streamlines the voluminous financial information for the court's convenience, without introducing any expert judgment or specialized knowledge.

美国证券交易委员会在其动议中强调，Ripple 并未对 Fox 计算或基础财务数据的准确性提出异议。该委员会认为，《福克斯宣言》只是为了法院的方便而精简了大量的财务信息，没有引入任何专家判断或专业知识。

The SEC also addressed Ripple's allegations that Fox's work involved interpretation of financial records and decision-making about the categorization of expenses and revenues. The SEC argues that this is a standard procedure for any summary witness who must review and form understandings of extensive data.

SEC 还回应了 Ripple 的指控，即 Fox 的工作涉及财务记录的解释以及有关费用和收入分类的决策。 SEC 认为，对于任何必须审查大量数据并形成理解的摘要证人来说，这是一个标准程序。

Citing legal precedents, the SEC maintains that summary witnesses may make assumptions based on the data they are summarizing, as long as those assumptions are disclosed and reasonably drawn from the data. The SEC argues that Fox's assumptions meet these criteria and do not convert the summary evidence into expert testimony.

美国证券交易委员会援引法律先例，认为摘要证人可以根据他们总结的数据做出假设，只要这些假设被披露并合理地从数据中得出。 SEC 认为福克斯的假设符合这些标准，并且没有将摘要证据转化为专家证词。

In addition to defending the admissibility of the Fox Declaration on evidentiary grounds, the SEC also rebuts Ripple's procedural challenges. The SEC clarifies that Fox does not meet the definition of an expert witness under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) because she does not provide specialized knowledge or opinions.

除了以证据为依据捍卫《福克斯声明》的可接受性之外，SEC 还反驳了 Ripple 的程序挑战。 SEC 澄清，Fox 不符合《联邦民事诉讼规则》第 26(a)(2) 条中专家证人的定义，因为她不提供专业知识或意见。

The SEC's motion underscores its position that the Fox Declaration is a permissible form of evidence that will assist the court in understanding the complex financial data relevant to the case. The motion also highlights the SEC's ongoing efforts to adhere to procedural requirements and present a comprehensive case against Ripple Labs.

美国证券交易委员会的动议强调了其立场，即福克斯声明是一种允许的证据形式，将有助于法院理解与案件相关的复杂财务数据。该动议还强调了 SEC 为遵守程序要求所做的持续努力，并针对 Ripple Labs 提出了全面的案例。

As the lawsuit progresses, legal experts speculate on the potential implications of the SEC's motion on the outcome of the case. While the court's ultimate decision remains uncertain, the SEC's arguments provide a strong defense for the admissibility of summary evidence in complex financial litigation.

随着诉讼的进展，法律专家猜测 SEC 动议对案件结果的潜在影响。尽管法院的最终裁决仍不确定，但 SEC 的论点为复杂金融诉讼中简易证据的可采性提供了强有力的辩护。