尹总统一方因反对执行逮捕和搜查令被法院驳回而考虑向最高法院提出上诉

尹锡烈总统方面表示，因反对执行逮捕，正在考虑向最高法院提起上诉

President Yoon Suk-yeol's camp has announced that they may appeal to the Supreme Court after the court dismissed their challenge to an arrest and search warrant.

尹锡烈总统的阵营宣布，在最高法院驳回他们对逮捕和搜查令的质疑后，他们可能会向最高法院提出上诉。

On Friday, Yoon's lawyer, Yoon Gap-geun, said, "The Seoul Western District Court dismissed the challenge without informing the applicant of the reasons." He added, "Once we understand the reasons for the dismissal, we will consider appealing to the Supreme Court."

周五，尹的律师尹甲根(Yoon Gap-geun)表示，“首尔西区地方法院驳回了质疑，但没有告知申请人理由。”他补充说，“一旦我们了解了解雇的原因，我们将考虑向最高法院提出上诉。”

"The purpose of the challenge was to prevent the arrest and search, and the dismissal of the challenge does not mean that the warrant is valid," he explained further.

“质疑的目的是为了防止逮捕和搜查，驳回质疑并不意味着逮捕令有效，”他进一步解释道。

Earlier this week, ahead of the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials' attempt to execute the warrant, Yoon's lawyer, Yoon Gap-geun, filed a challenge with the court, arguing that there were problems with the warrant content.

本周早些时候，在高级官员腐败调查办公室试图执行逮捕令之前，尹的律师尹甲根向法院提出质疑，认为逮捕令的内容存在问题。

In the search warrant issued by the Seoul Western District Court, the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials had specified that 'Articles 110 and 111 of the Criminal Procedure Act do not apply to this warrant,' arguing that this violated Article 12 of the Constitution, which states that 'no arrest, detention, search, or seizure shall be made without due process of law.'

首尔西地方法院发出的搜查令中，高级官员腐败调查办公室指出，“本搜查令不适用刑事诉讼法第一百一十条和第一百一十一条”，认为这违反了刑事诉讼法第12条的规定。宪法规定，“未经正当法律程序，不得实施逮捕、拘留、搜查或扣押”。

However, Judge Ma Seong-young of the Seoul Western District Court's Criminal Division 7 dismissed the challenge, stating, "It cannot be seen as an unconstitutional act infringing on legislative power," and "It cannot be deemed illegal for the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials to request the arrest and search warrants from the Seoul Western District Court, which has jurisdiction over the location of the Presidential Office and residence."

然而，首尔西地方法院刑事第七庭法官马成英驳回了这一质疑，称“这不能被视为侵犯立法权的违宪行为”，“对于腐败调查办公室来说，这不能被视为违法”。高级官员向首尔西部地方法院请求逮捕和搜查令，该法院对总统办公室和住所的位置拥有管辖权。”

Hong Min-sung, Hankyung.com reporter mshong@hankyung.com

韩京网记者 洪敏成 mshong@hankyung.com