市值: $2.6987T 0.600%
成交额(24h): $79.7246B 4.470%
  • 市值: $2.6987T 0.600%
  • 成交额(24h): $79.7246B 4.470%
  • 恐惧与贪婪指数:
  • 市值: $2.6987T 0.600%
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
热门新闻
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
bitcoin
bitcoin

$84720.887476 USD

1.85%

ethereum
ethereum

$1882.087494 USD

2.47%

tether
tether

$0.999992 USD

0.02%

xrp
xrp

$2.103516 USD

-0.28%

bnb
bnb

$603.720228 USD

-0.90%

solana
solana

$124.907077 USD

-1.26%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$1.000009 USD

0.00%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.171794 USD

1.56%

cardano
cardano

$0.672517 USD

0.21%

tron
tron

$0.238010 USD

0.94%

toncoin
toncoin

$3.982310 USD

-4.11%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.782927 USD

0.53%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.409232 USD

2.25%

stellar
stellar

$0.268957 USD

0.85%

avalanche
avalanche

$19.348366 USD

1.29%

加密货币新闻

President Yoon's side to consider appealing to Supreme Court after their objection to the execution of an arrest and search warrant was dismissed by the court

2025/01/05 15:38

President Yoon's side to consider appealing to Supreme Court after their objection to the execution of an arrest and search warrant was dismissed by the court

President Yoon Suk-yeol's camp has announced that they may appeal to the Supreme Court after the court dismissed their challenge to an arrest and search warrant.

On Friday, Yoon's lawyer, Yoon Gap-geun, said, "The Seoul Western District Court dismissed the challenge without informing the applicant of the reasons." He added, "Once we understand the reasons for the dismissal, we will consider appealing to the Supreme Court."

"The purpose of the challenge was to prevent the arrest and search, and the dismissal of the challenge does not mean that the warrant is valid," he explained further.

Earlier this week, ahead of the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials' attempt to execute the warrant, Yoon's lawyer, Yoon Gap-geun, filed a challenge with the court, arguing that there were problems with the warrant content.

In the search warrant issued by the Seoul Western District Court, the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials had specified that 'Articles 110 and 111 of the Criminal Procedure Act do not apply to this warrant,' arguing that this violated Article 12 of the Constitution, which states that 'no arrest, detention, search, or seizure shall be made without due process of law.'

However, Judge Ma Seong-young of the Seoul Western District Court's Criminal Division 7 dismissed the challenge, stating, "It cannot be seen as an unconstitutional act infringing on legislative power," and "It cannot be deemed illegal for the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials to request the arrest and search warrants from the Seoul Western District Court, which has jurisdiction over the location of the Presidential Office and residence."

Hong Min-sung, Hankyung.com reporter mshong@hankyung.com

免责声明:info@kdj.com

所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!

如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。

2025年04月02日 发表的其他文章