尹總統一方因反對執行逮捕和搜索令被法院駁回而考慮向最高法院提出上訴

尹錫烈總統方面表示，因反對執行逮捕，正在考慮向最高法院提起上訴

President Yoon Suk-yeol's camp has announced that they may appeal to the Supreme Court after the court dismissed their challenge to an arrest and search warrant.

尹錫烈總統的陣營宣布，在最高法院駁回他們對逮捕和搜查令的質疑後，他們可能會向最高法院提出上訴。

On Friday, Yoon's lawyer, Yoon Gap-geun, said, "The Seoul Western District Court dismissed the challenge without informing the applicant of the reasons." He added, "Once we understand the reasons for the dismissal, we will consider appealing to the Supreme Court."

週五，尹的律師尹甲根(Yoon Gap-geun)表示，“首爾西區地方法院駁回了質疑，但沒有告知申請人理由。”他補充說：“一旦我們了解了解僱的原因，我們將考慮向最高法院提出上訴。”

"The purpose of the challenge was to prevent the arrest and search, and the dismissal of the challenge does not mean that the warrant is valid," he explained further.

「質疑的目的是為了防止逮捕和搜查，駁回質疑並不意味著逮捕令有效，」他進一步解釋。

Earlier this week, ahead of the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials' attempt to execute the warrant, Yoon's lawyer, Yoon Gap-geun, filed a challenge with the court, arguing that there were problems with the warrant content.

本週早些時候，在高級官員腐敗調查辦公室試圖執行逮捕令之前，尹的律師尹甲根向法院提出質疑，認為逮捕令的內容有問題。

In the search warrant issued by the Seoul Western District Court, the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials had specified that 'Articles 110 and 111 of the Criminal Procedure Act do not apply to this warrant,' arguing that this violated Article 12 of the Constitution, which states that 'no arrest, detention, search, or seizure shall be made without due process of law.'

在首爾西地方法院發出的搜查令中，高級官員腐敗調查辦公室指出，“本搜查令不適用刑事訴訟法第一百一十條和第一百一十一條”，認為這違反了刑事訴訟法第12條的規定。

However, Judge Ma Seong-young of the Seoul Western District Court's Criminal Division 7 dismissed the challenge, stating, "It cannot be seen as an unconstitutional act infringing on legislative power," and "It cannot be deemed illegal for the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials to request the arrest and search warrants from the Seoul Western District Court, which has jurisdiction over the location of the Presidential Office and residence."

然而，首爾西地方法院刑事第七庭法官馬成英駁回了這一質疑，稱“這不能被視為侵犯立法權的違憲行為”，“對於腐敗調查辦公室來說，這不能被視為違法”。官員向首爾西部地方法院請求逮捕和搜查令，該法院對總統辦公室和住所的位置擁有管轄權。

Hong Min-sung, Hankyung.com reporter mshong@hankyung.com

韓京網記者 洪敏成 mshong@hankyung.com