市值: $2.6754T -0.860%
體積(24小時): $130.019B 63.090%
  • 市值: $2.6754T -0.860%
  • 體積(24小時): $130.019B 63.090%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $2.6754T -0.860%
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
頭號新聞
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$83571.608249 USD

-1.38%

ethereum
ethereum

$1826.028236 USD

-3.02%

tether
tether

$0.999839 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.053149 USD

-2.48%

bnb
bnb

$601.140115 USD

-0.44%

solana
solana

$120.357332 USD

-3.79%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999833 USD

-0.02%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.166175 USD

-3.43%

cardano
cardano

$0.652521 USD

-3.00%

tron
tron

$0.236809 USD

-0.59%

toncoin
toncoin

$3.785339 USD

-5.02%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.253231 USD

-3.91%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.397427 USD

-0.19%

stellar
stellar

$0.266444 USD

-1.00%

sui
sui

$2.409007 USD

1.15%

加密貨幣新聞文章

President Yoon's side to consider appealing to Supreme Court after their objection to the execution of an arrest and search warrant was dismissed by the court

2025/01/05 15:38

President Yoon's side to consider appealing to Supreme Court after their objection to the execution of an arrest and search warrant was dismissed by the court

President Yoon Suk-yeol's camp has announced that they may appeal to the Supreme Court after the court dismissed their challenge to an arrest and search warrant.

On Friday, Yoon's lawyer, Yoon Gap-geun, said, "The Seoul Western District Court dismissed the challenge without informing the applicant of the reasons." He added, "Once we understand the reasons for the dismissal, we will consider appealing to the Supreme Court."

"The purpose of the challenge was to prevent the arrest and search, and the dismissal of the challenge does not mean that the warrant is valid," he explained further.

Earlier this week, ahead of the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials' attempt to execute the warrant, Yoon's lawyer, Yoon Gap-geun, filed a challenge with the court, arguing that there were problems with the warrant content.

In the search warrant issued by the Seoul Western District Court, the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials had specified that 'Articles 110 and 111 of the Criminal Procedure Act do not apply to this warrant,' arguing that this violated Article 12 of the Constitution, which states that 'no arrest, detention, search, or seizure shall be made without due process of law.'

However, Judge Ma Seong-young of the Seoul Western District Court's Criminal Division 7 dismissed the challenge, stating, "It cannot be seen as an unconstitutional act infringing on legislative power," and "It cannot be deemed illegal for the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials to request the arrest and search warrants from the Seoul Western District Court, which has jurisdiction over the location of the Presidential Office and residence."

Hong Min-sung, Hankyung.com reporter mshong@hankyung.com

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年04月03日 其他文章發表於