Capitalisation boursière: $2.6754T -0.860%
Volume(24h): $130.019B 63.090%
  • Capitalisation boursière: $2.6754T -0.860%
  • Volume(24h): $130.019B 63.090%
  • Indice de peur et de cupidité:
  • Capitalisation boursière: $2.6754T -0.860%
Cryptos
Les sujets
Cryptospedia
Nouvelles
Cryptosopique
Vidéos
Top nouvelles
Cryptos
Les sujets
Cryptospedia
Nouvelles
Cryptosopique
Vidéos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$83571.608249 USD

-1.38%

ethereum
ethereum

$1826.028236 USD

-3.02%

tether
tether

$0.999839 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.053149 USD

-2.48%

bnb
bnb

$601.140115 USD

-0.44%

solana
solana

$120.357332 USD

-3.79%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999833 USD

-0.02%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.166175 USD

-3.43%

cardano
cardano

$0.652521 USD

-3.00%

tron
tron

$0.236809 USD

-0.59%

toncoin
toncoin

$3.785339 USD

-5.02%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.253231 USD

-3.91%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.397427 USD

-0.19%

stellar
stellar

$0.266444 USD

-1.00%

sui
sui

$2.409007 USD

1.15%

Articles d’actualité sur les crypto-monnaies

President Yoon's side to consider appealing to Supreme Court after their objection to the execution of an arrest and search warrant was dismissed by the court

Jan 05, 2025 at 03:38 pm

President Yoon's side to consider appealing to Supreme Court after their objection to the execution of an arrest and search warrant was dismissed by the court

President Yoon Suk-yeol's camp has announced that they may appeal to the Supreme Court after the court dismissed their challenge to an arrest and search warrant.

On Friday, Yoon's lawyer, Yoon Gap-geun, said, "The Seoul Western District Court dismissed the challenge without informing the applicant of the reasons." He added, "Once we understand the reasons for the dismissal, we will consider appealing to the Supreme Court."

"The purpose of the challenge was to prevent the arrest and search, and the dismissal of the challenge does not mean that the warrant is valid," he explained further.

Earlier this week, ahead of the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials' attempt to execute the warrant, Yoon's lawyer, Yoon Gap-geun, filed a challenge with the court, arguing that there were problems with the warrant content.

In the search warrant issued by the Seoul Western District Court, the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials had specified that 'Articles 110 and 111 of the Criminal Procedure Act do not apply to this warrant,' arguing that this violated Article 12 of the Constitution, which states that 'no arrest, detention, search, or seizure shall be made without due process of law.'

However, Judge Ma Seong-young of the Seoul Western District Court's Criminal Division 7 dismissed the challenge, stating, "It cannot be seen as an unconstitutional act infringing on legislative power," and "It cannot be deemed illegal for the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials to request the arrest and search warrants from the Seoul Western District Court, which has jurisdiction over the location of the Presidential Office and residence."

Hong Min-sung, Hankyung.com reporter mshong@hankyung.com

Clause de non-responsabilité:info@kdj.com

Les informations fournies ne constituent pas des conseils commerciaux. kdj.com n’assume aucune responsabilité pour les investissements effectués sur la base des informations fournies dans cet article. Les crypto-monnaies sont très volatiles et il est fortement recommandé d’investir avec prudence après une recherche approfondie!

Si vous pensez que le contenu utilisé sur ce site Web porte atteinte à vos droits d’auteur, veuillez nous contacter immédiatement (info@kdj.com) et nous le supprimerons dans les plus brefs délais.

Autres articles publiés sur Apr 03, 2025