NFT 市场 OpenSea 躲避集体诉讼，原告自愿驳回案件

据 Cointelegraph 报道，不可替代代币（NFT）市场 OpenSea 的两名用户已自愿驳回集体诉讼

Two users of the non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace OpenSea have voluntarily dismissed their class-action lawsuit, which accused the platform of selling unregistered securities, following a ruling by Judge Cecilia Altonaga in a Florida federal court allowing OpenSea to compel arbitration.

佛罗里达州联邦法院法官塞西莉亚·阿尔托纳加 (Cecilia Altonaga) 做出允许 OpenSea 强制仲裁的裁决后，非同质化代币 (NFT) 市场 OpenSea 的两名用户自愿驳回了指控该平台出售未注册证券的集体诉讼。

The plaintiffs, Anthony Shnayderman and Itai Bronshtein, filed for dismissal on November 7 after the judge's order last month.

在法官上个月下达命令后，原告 Anthony Shnayderman 和 Itai Bronshtein 于 11 月 7 日申请驳回诉讼。

OpenSea had maintained that the users were bound by its terms of use, which stipulate that all claims must be resolved through arbitration. In an October filing, OpenSea emphasized its intention to move the plaintiffs to arbitration and indicated it would appeal any court denial, effectively pausing the case. The NFT marketplace argued that users agree to resolve disputes through the alternative dispute resolution services provider JAMS.

OpenSea坚称用户受其使用条款的约束，该条款规定所有索赔必须通过仲裁解决。在 10 月份提交的文件中，OpenSea 强调其打算将原告提交仲裁，并表示将对法院的任何驳回提出上诉，从而有效地暂停该案。 NFT 市场辩称，用户同意通过替代争议解决服务提供商 JAMS 解决争议。

The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit in September, alleging that the NFTs purchased on OpenSea were unregistered securities contracts in the United States and were worthless due to their illegal nature. They pointed to OpenSea's August disclosure of a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Wells notice, suggesting potential liability for facilitating the exchange of unregistered securities. The suit also highlighted the SEC's actions against NFT projects Stoner Cats 2 and Impact Theory, where NFTs were deemed unregistered securities. The plaintiffs claimed that OpenSea breached a user warranty by failing to moderate its exchange for unregistered securities.

原告于 9 月提起诉讼，指控在 OpenSea 上购买的 NFT 是未在美国注册的证券合约，由于其非法性质而毫无价值。他们指出 OpenSea 8 月份披露的美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) Wells 通知，暗示了促进未注册证券交易的潜在责任。该诉讼还强调了 SEC 针对 NFT 项目 Stoner Cats 2 和 Impact Theory 采取的行动，其中 NFT 被视为未注册证券。原告声称 OpenSea 未能调节未注册证券的交易，违反了用户保证。

Adam Moskowitz, the attorney representing Shnayderman and Bronshtein, stated that they had no choice but to dismiss the case. He explained that their primary objective was to establish a framework for creating a functional global marketplace for NFTs, considering upcoming political and legislative changes. Moskowitz expressed hope that OpenSea could play a role in supervising and monitoring NFTs traded on its platform, from which it profits. He also mentioned ongoing efforts to assist victims of failed NFTs and other crypto products.

施奈德曼和布朗施泰因的代理律师亚当·莫斯科维茨表示，他们别无选择，只能驳回此案。他解释说，考虑到即将到来的政治和立法变化，他们的主要目标是建立一个框架，为 NFT 创建一个功能性的全球市场。 Moskowitz 表示希望 OpenSea 能够发挥监督和监控其平台上交易的 NFT 的作用，并从中获利。他还提到了为帮助失败的 NFT 和其他加密产品的受害者所做的持续努力。

An OpenSea spokesperson dismissed the allegations as baseless, asserting that the lawsuit was unfounded and based on the disclosure of an SEC Wells notice. OpenSea did not immediately comment on the voluntary dismissal of the lawsuit.

OpenSea 发言人驳斥了这些指控，认为这些指控毫无根据，并声称该诉讼毫无根据，并且基于 SEC Wells 通知的披露。 OpenSea 没有立即对自愿驳回诉讼发表评论。