NFT 市場 OpenSea 逃避集體訴訟，原告自願駁回案件

根據 Cointelegraph 報導，不可取代代幣（NFT）市場 OpenSea 的兩名用戶已自願駁回集體訴訟

Two users of the non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace OpenSea have voluntarily dismissed their class-action lawsuit, which accused the platform of selling unregistered securities, following a ruling by Judge Cecilia Altonaga in a Florida federal court allowing OpenSea to compel arbitration.

佛羅裡達州聯邦法院法官塞西莉亞·阿爾托納加(Cecilia Altonaga) 做出允許OpenSea 強制仲裁的裁決後，非同質化代幣(NFT) 市場OpenSea 的兩名用戶自願駁回了指控該平台出售未註冊證券的集體訴訟。

The plaintiffs, Anthony Shnayderman and Itai Bronshtein, filed for dismissal on November 7 after the judge's order last month.

在法官上個月下達命令後，原告 Anthony Shnayderman 和 Itai Bronshtein 於 11 月 7 日申請駁回訴訟。

OpenSea had maintained that the users were bound by its terms of use, which stipulate that all claims must be resolved through arbitration. In an October filing, OpenSea emphasized its intention to move the plaintiffs to arbitration and indicated it would appeal any court denial, effectively pausing the case. The NFT marketplace argued that users agree to resolve disputes through the alternative dispute resolution services provider JAMS.

OpenSea堅稱使用者受其使用條款的約束，該條款規定所有索賠必須透過仲裁解決。在 10 月提交的文件中，OpenSea 強調其打算將原告提交仲裁，並表示將對法院的任何駁回提出上訴，從而有效地暫停該案。 NFT 市場辯稱，用戶同意透過替代爭議解決服務提供者 JAMS 解決爭議。

The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit in September, alleging that the NFTs purchased on OpenSea were unregistered securities contracts in the United States and were worthless due to their illegal nature. They pointed to OpenSea's August disclosure of a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Wells notice, suggesting potential liability for facilitating the exchange of unregistered securities. The suit also highlighted the SEC's actions against NFT projects Stoner Cats 2 and Impact Theory, where NFTs were deemed unregistered securities. The plaintiffs claimed that OpenSea breached a user warranty by failing to moderate its exchange for unregistered securities.

原告於 9 月提起訴訟，指控在 OpenSea 上購買的 NFT 是未在美國註冊的證券合約，由於其非法性質而毫無價值。他們指出 OpenSea 8 月披露的美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) Wells 通知，暗示了促進未註冊證券交易的潛在責任。該訴訟還強調了 SEC 針對 NFT 項目 Stoner Cats 2 和 Impact Theory 採取的行動，其中 NFT 被視為未註冊證券。原告聲稱 OpenSea 未能調節未註冊證券的交易，違反了用戶保證。

Adam Moskowitz, the attorney representing Shnayderman and Bronshtein, stated that they had no choice but to dismiss the case. He explained that their primary objective was to establish a framework for creating a functional global marketplace for NFTs, considering upcoming political and legislative changes. Moskowitz expressed hope that OpenSea could play a role in supervising and monitoring NFTs traded on its platform, from which it profits. He also mentioned ongoing efforts to assist victims of failed NFTs and other crypto products.

施奈德曼和布朗施泰因的代理律師亞當·莫斯科維茨表示，他們別無選擇，只能駁回此案。他解釋說，考慮到即將到來的政治和立法變化，他們的主要目標是建立一個框架，為 NFT 創建一個功能性的全球市場。 Moskowitz 表示希望 OpenSea 能夠發揮監督和監控其平台上交易的 NFT 的作用，並從中獲利。他還提到了為幫助失敗的 NFT 和其他加密產品的受害者所做的持續努力。

An OpenSea spokesperson dismissed the allegations as baseless, asserting that the lawsuit was unfounded and based on the disclosure of an SEC Wells notice. OpenSea did not immediately comment on the voluntary dismissal of the lawsuit.

OpenSea 發言人駁斥了這些指控，認為這些指控毫無根據，並聲稱該訴訟毫無根據，並且基於 SEC Wells 通知的披露。 OpenSea 沒有立即對自願駁回訴訟發表評論。