Money Electric：比特币之谜和卡伦·霍巴克的主要评论

因此，HBO 电影《Money Electric：比特币之谜》上线了，该片试图揭开中本聪日渐衰弱的性格的真相。

HBO movie Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery hit the screens on Friday, aiming to uncover the true identity of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto. The film presents a strong case for software developer Peter Todd being Satoshi, despite his denials.

HBO 电影《Money Electric：比特币之谜》周五上映，旨在揭开比特币创造者中本聪的真实身份。尽管软件开发人员彼得托德否认，但这部电影有力地证明了软件开发人员彼得托德就是中本聪。

Film director Cullen Hoback explained his reasoning in an interview with Decrypt, highlighting the massive impact Bitcoin has had on the global economy and the importance of understanding who controls a large portion of it.

电影导演卡伦·霍巴克 (Cullen Hoback) 在接受 Decrypt 采访时解释了他的推理，强调了比特币对全球经济的巨大影响，以及了解谁控制着其中很大一部分的重要性。

“If Bitcoin had petered out, if it wasn’t being embraced by nation states, wasn’t being incorporated into 401(k)s, it would be a different story. But bitcoin is increasingly becoming a major backbone of the financial system. It’s not going anywhere. Meanwhile, there is this anonymous figure who likely controls, or very possibly controls, a massive share of it — a million or so bitcoin. So, I think that understanding if that person still holds the keys (to their crypto wallet), what the ideas and intent of that person or people, really are, is important, given bitcoin’s prominence.”

“如果比特币逐渐消失，如果它没有被民族国家所接受，没有被纳入 401(k)s，那么情况就会不同。但比特币正日益成为金融体系的主要支柱。它不会去任何地方。与此同时，有一个匿名人物可能控制着，或者很可能控制着其中的很大一部分——一百万左右的比特币。因此，我认为，考虑到比特币的突出地位，了解这个人是否仍然持有（他们的加密钱包）钥匙，这个人或其他人的想法和意图到底是什么，是很重要的。”

Hoback also pointed out how the mythology surrounding Satoshi may be detrimental to Bitcoin at this stage.

霍巴克还指出，围绕中本聪的神话在现阶段可能对比特币不利。

“I think that the mythos around this anonymous figure was beneficial largely because it started to take on an almost godlike quality. Like it came down from the heavens and was bestowed upon humanity. And it allowed people to kind of believe whatever they wanted about it. That it was so pure and that it was kind of the solution to all the world’s problems.

“我认为围绕这​​个匿名人物的神话很大程度上是有益的，因为它开始呈现出近乎神的品质。就像它从天而降，赐予人类一样。它让人们可以相信他们想要的任何东西。它是如此纯粹，它是世界上所有问题的解决方案。

I think at this point that mythos is actually a detriment to Bitcoin. I think that’s part of why trying to solve it right now is important. Because it is baked into our financial system at this point, and it touches the lives of most people.”

我认为在这一点上神话实际上对比特币是有害的。我认为这就是为什么现在尝试解决这个问题很重要的部分原因。因为它此时已融入我们的金融体系，并且触及大多数人的生活。”

When asked about his confidence level in the theory, Hoback stated that the film presents a strong case, leaving the final judgment up to the audience.

当被问及他对该理论的信心程度时，霍巴克表示，这部电影提供了强有力的案例，将最终的判断留给观众。

“Well I think we present a hell of a case in the film. And ultimately, it’s like if you were doing a trial or something, right? You’re going to make the best case you possibly can. It’s not like we have Satoshi literally sending a transaction on camera. Like that fake Satoshi did a number of years ago, when Craig Wright convinced a number of people that he was behind it. We don’t have Satoshi doing that.

“我认为我们在影片中呈现了一个非常出色的案例。最终，就像你正在进行试验或其他什么，对吗？你将尽你所能做出最好的情况。这并不像我们让中本聪在镜头前发送交易。就像几年前假中本聪所做的那样，当时克雷格赖特让很多人相信他是幕后黑手。我们没有中本聪这样做。

We confront Satoshi who we make a strong case for in this film, and I think their reaction is in some ways more telling than even the evidence itself. So I don’t think my confidence level is as important as what the audience takes away when they see the evidence for themselves.”

我们面对的是中本聪，我们在这部电影中为他辩护，我认为他们的反应在某些方面甚至比证据本身更能说明问题。所以我认为我的信心水平并不像观众亲眼看到证据时所得到的那样重要。”

The film also delves into the qualifications of the Bitcoin creator as a possible self-learner, with Hoback consulting professional C++ coders to assess the code.

影片还深入探讨了比特币创造者作为自学者的资格，霍巴克咨询了专业的 C++ 程序员来评估代码。

“Something I kept going back to is that the original code didn’t look like it was made by a professional developer. And I’m sure people would debate that. And I had professional C++ coders review the code, review the code of the suspects and make sure, you know, they were someone who could have written this.”

“我不断回顾的一件事是，原始代码看起来不像是由专业开发人员编写的。我相信人们会对此进行辩论。我让专业的 C++ 程序员审查了代码，审查了嫌疑人的代码，并确保他们是可以编写此代码的人。”

Finally, Hoback speculated on why Peter Todd might have agreed to be interviewed for the film.

最后，霍巴克推测了为什么彼得·托德可能同意接受这部电影的采访。

“I think there’s there’s a psychology to these individuals who have done something that has a massive impact in the world — create these massive global movements — and they’re harboring the secret. And imagine if you were harboring that secret. Would you want some credit for it? And would you at some point maybe believe: Hey, I’ve gotten away with it this long. Going on camera and talking to these guys it’ll probably be even better cover. Who would believe that Satoshi would actually go on camera?”

“我认为这些人有一种心理，他们做了一些对世界产生巨大影响的事情——创造了这些大规模的全球运动——而且他们隐藏着这个秘密。想象一下，如果你隐藏着这个秘密。你想为此获得一些荣誉吗？你是否会在某个时候相信：嘿，我已经逃脱了这么久。在镜头前和这些人交谈可能会更好。谁会相信中本聪真的会出现在镜头前呢？”

The film’s findings and theories are certainly intriguing and have sparked discussions within the crypto community. However, it’s crucial to remember that without an explicit confession or irrefutable evidence, the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto remains a mystery.

这部电影的发现和理论确实很有趣，并引发了加密社区内的讨论。然而，重要的是要记住，如果没有明确的供述或无可辩驳的证据，中本聪的真实身份仍然是个谜。