Money Electric：比特幣之謎和卡倫霍巴克的主要評論

因此，HBO 電影《Money Electric：比特幣之謎》上線了，該片試圖揭開中本聰日漸衰弱的性格的真相。

HBO movie Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery hit the screens on Friday, aiming to uncover the true identity of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto. The film presents a strong case for software developer Peter Todd being Satoshi, despite his denials.

HBO 電影《Money Electric：比特幣之謎》週五上映，旨在揭開比特幣創造者中本聰的真實身份。儘管軟體開發人員彼得托德否認，但這部電影有力地證明了軟體開發人員彼得托德就是中本聰。

Film director Cullen Hoback explained his reasoning in an interview with Decrypt, highlighting the massive impact Bitcoin has had on the global economy and the importance of understanding who controls a large portion of it.

電影導演卡倫霍巴克 (Cullen Hoback) 在接受 Decrypt 採訪時解釋了他的推理，強調了比特幣對全球經濟的巨大影響，以及了解誰控制著其中很大一部分的重要性。

“If Bitcoin had petered out, if it wasn’t being embraced by nation states, wasn’t being incorporated into 401(k)s, it would be a different story. But bitcoin is increasingly becoming a major backbone of the financial system. It’s not going anywhere. Meanwhile, there is this anonymous figure who likely controls, or very possibly controls, a massive share of it — a million or so bitcoin. So, I think that understanding if that person still holds the keys (to their crypto wallet), what the ideas and intent of that person or people, really are, is important, given bitcoin’s prominence.”

「如果比特幣逐漸消失，如果它沒有被民族國家所接受，沒有被納入 401(k)s，那麼情況就會不同。但比特幣正日益成為金融體系的主要支柱。它不會去任何地方。同時，有一個匿名人物可能控制著，或者很可能控制著其中很大的一部分——一百萬左右的比特幣。因此，我認為，考慮到比特幣的突出地位，了解這個人是否仍然持有（他們的加密錢包）鑰匙，這個人或其他人的想法和意圖到底是什麼，是很重要的。

Hoback also pointed out how the mythology surrounding Satoshi may be detrimental to Bitcoin at this stage.

霍巴克也指出，圍繞中本聰的神話在現階段可能對比特幣不利。

“I think that the mythos around this anonymous figure was beneficial largely because it started to take on an almost godlike quality. Like it came down from the heavens and was bestowed upon humanity. And it allowed people to kind of believe whatever they wanted about it. That it was so pure and that it was kind of the solution to all the world’s problems.

「我認為圍繞這個匿名人物的神話很大程度上是有益的，因為它開始呈現出近乎神的品質。就像它從天而降，賜給人類一樣。它讓人們可以相信他們想要的任何東西。它是如此純粹，它是世界上所有問題的解決方案。

I think at this point that mythos is actually a detriment to Bitcoin. I think that’s part of why trying to solve it right now is important. Because it is baked into our financial system at this point, and it touches the lives of most people.”

我認為在這一點上神話實際上對比特幣是有害的。我認為這就是為什麼現在嘗試解決這個問題很重要的部分原因。因為它此時已融入我們的金融體系，並且觸及大多數人的生活。

When asked about his confidence level in the theory, Hoback stated that the film presents a strong case, leaving the final judgment up to the audience.

當被問及他對理論的信心程度時，霍巴克表示，這部電影提供了一個強有力的案例，將最終的判斷留給觀眾。

“Well I think we present a hell of a case in the film. And ultimately, it’s like if you were doing a trial or something, right? You’re going to make the best case you possibly can. It’s not like we have Satoshi literally sending a transaction on camera. Like that fake Satoshi did a number of years ago, when Craig Wright convinced a number of people that he was behind it. We don’t have Satoshi doing that.

「我認為我們在影片中呈現了一個非常出色的案例。最終，就像你正在進行試驗或其他什麼，對嗎？你將盡你所能做出最好的情況。這並不像我們讓中本聰在鏡頭前發送交易。就像幾年前假中本聰所做的那樣，當時克雷格賴特讓許多人相信他是幕後黑手。我們沒有中本聰這樣做。

We confront Satoshi who we make a strong case for in this film, and I think their reaction is in some ways more telling than even the evidence itself. So I don’t think my confidence level is as important as what the audience takes away when they see the evidence for themselves.”

我們面對的是中本聰，我們在這部電影中為他辯護，我認為他們的反應在某些方面甚至比證據本身更能說明問題。所以我認為我的信心水平並不像觀眾親眼看到證據時所得到的那樣重要。

The film also delves into the qualifications of the Bitcoin creator as a possible self-learner, with Hoback consulting professional C++ coders to assess the code.

影片也深入探討了比特幣創造者作為自學者的資格，霍巴克諮詢了專業的 C++ 程式設計師來評估程式碼。

“Something I kept going back to is that the original code didn’t look like it was made by a professional developer. And I’m sure people would debate that. And I had professional C++ coders review the code, review the code of the suspects and make sure, you know, they were someone who could have written this.”

「我不斷回顧的一件事是，原始程式碼看起來不像是由專業開發人員編寫的。我相信人們會對此進行辯論。我讓專業的 C++ 程式設計師審查了程式碼，審查了嫌疑人的程式碼，並確保他們是可以編寫此程式碼的人。

Finally, Hoback speculated on why Peter Todd might have agreed to be interviewed for the film.

最後，霍巴克推測了為什麼彼得·托德可能同意接受這部電影的採訪。

“I think there’s there’s a psychology to these individuals who have done something that has a massive impact in the world — create these massive global movements — and they’re harboring the secret. And imagine if you were harboring that secret. Would you want some credit for it? And would you at some point maybe believe: Hey, I’ve gotten away with it this long. Going on camera and talking to these guys it’ll probably be even better cover. Who would believe that Satoshi would actually go on camera?”

「我認為這些人有一種心理，他們做了一些對世界產生巨大影響的事情——創造了這些大規模的全球運動——而且他們隱藏著這個秘密。想像一下，如果你隱藏著這個秘密。你想為此獲得一些榮譽嗎？你是否會在某個時候相信：嘿，我已經逃脫了這麼久。在鏡頭前和這些人交談可能會更好。誰會相信中本聰真的會出現在鏡頭前呢？

The film’s findings and theories are certainly intriguing and have sparked discussions within the crypto community. However, it’s crucial to remember that without an explicit confession or irrefutable evidence, the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto remains a mystery.

這部電影的發現和理論確實很有趣，並引發了加密社群內的討論。然而，重要的是要記住，如果沒有明確的供詞或無可辯駁的證據，中本聰的真實身份仍然是個謎。