|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janine Parody 博士選擇不讓這隻生病的八個月大的貓入睡,而是選擇違背主人的意願對其進行治療。
A Suffolk vet has been found guilty of disgraceful conduct after she decided to take a cat home that was scheduled for euthanasia.
薩福克郡的一名獸醫在決定將一隻原定安樂死的貓帶回家後被判犯有可恥行為。
Dr Janine Parody chose not to put the ill eight-month-old feline to sleep, instead opting to treat it against the owner's wishes.
Janine Parody 博士選擇不讓這隻生病的八個月大的貓入睡,而是選擇違背主人的意願對其進行治療。
The seasoned vet had already euthanised three or four animals that day and stated she could "not face another euthanasia", deeming the cat to be "happy" and curable.
這位經驗豐富的獸醫當天已經對三四隻動物實施了安樂死,並表示她“無法再面臨另一次安樂死”,認為這隻貓“很快樂”並且可以治愈。
Without obtaining the owner's permission, Dr Parody sedated the cat, neutered it, removed its microchip, inserted a new one, and took it home to care for it.
未經主人許可,帕羅迪醫生給這隻貓注射了鎮靜劑,絕育了它,取出了它的微芯片,插入了新的芯片,然後把它帶回家照顧。
The cat's owner, who frequently rescues cats and had only recently acquired this one, said she "grieved for his little soul" and was asked to pay £480 for the treatment once she was told the cat was alive and she could reclaim it.
這隻貓的主人經常救助貓,最近才得到這隻貓。 480 英鎊的治療費用。
A Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons [RCVS] tribunal found Dr Parody guilty of disgraceful conduct and issued her a reprimand.
皇家獸醫學院 [RCVS] 法庭裁定 Parody 博士犯有可恥行為,並對她進行了譴責。
The RCVS panel concluded that Dr Parody made a "series of very poor decisions" but was operating under "extraordinarily stressful circumstances" due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
RCVS 小組的結論是,Parody 博士做出了“一系列非常糟糕的決定”,但由於 Covid-19 大流行,他是在“異常緊張的情況下”運作的。
The tribunal heard that at the time, Dr Parody was employed at Castle Veterinary Group in Framlingham, Suffolk. Colleagues described her as an "outstanding vet" who is "very fair".
法庭獲悉,當時 Parody 博士受僱於薩福克郡法拉姆靈厄姆的 Castle Veterinary Group。同事們形容她是一位「非常公正」的「傑出獸醫」。
In early December 2021, a woman who regularly rescues cats became the owner of eight-month-old Shadow, reports The Express.
根據《快報》報道,2021 年 12 月初,一名經常救助貓的婦女成為了 8 個月大影子的主人。
During a tribunal, it was revealed that a woman identified as "SM" faced the heart-wrenching decision to have her cat Shadow put to sleep on 20 December 2021 due to a severe illness, including MRSA, emaciation, and facial injuries. She believed Dr Parody carried out the procedure.
在法庭上,一名被稱為「SM」的婦女因患有 MRSA、體重減輕和臉部受傷等嚴重疾病,面臨著令人心碎的決定,她於 2021 年 12 月 20 日讓她的貓 Shadow 入睡。她相信帕羅迪醫生實施了這個手術。
However, after a colleague mentioned the potential for treating cats with MRSA, Dr Parody decided against euthanasia. Instead, she shaved and neutered Shadow two days later, removed its microchip with the help of a colleague, and took it home to care for it over Christmas.
然而,在一位同事提到治療帶有 MRSA 的貓的潛力後,Parody 博士決定反對安樂死。相反,兩天后,她給影子剃了毛並絕育,在同事的幫助下取出了它的微芯片,並在聖誕節期間把它帶回家照顧它。
To the owner's astonishment, she later learned that Shadow hadn't been put down, which left her both stunned and overjoyed. Despite this rollercoaster of emotions, the pet owner agreed to a payment of £480 to reclaim Shadow.
讓主人驚訝的是,她後來得知影子並沒有被放下,這讓她又驚又喜。儘管情緒起伏不定,寵物主人還是同意支付 480 英鎊來找回影子。
Sadly, Shadow's health deteriorated further, leading to his eventual euthanasia two months on. Dr Parody stepped down after an investigation into the incident commenced.
可悲的是,影子的健康狀況進一步惡化,導致他最終在兩個月後被安樂死。帕羅迪博士在對事件展開調查後辭職。
The owner implied during the tribunal that Dr Parody might have had intentions to keep the animal herself.
主人在法庭上暗示,帕羅迪博士可能有意自己保留這隻動物。
Dr Parody explained feeling overwhelmed by the pressures of Covid-19, taking on additional work from two other practices, and dealing with an overbooked schedule.
Parody 博士解釋說,他對 Covid-19 的壓力感到不知所措,從另外兩個診所承擔了額外的工作,並處理了超額預約的日程。
She told the tribunal: "I gowned up and I first saw the cat when I walked into a consulting room... We were ready to euthanise him."
她告訴法庭:“我穿上長袍,當我走進諮詢室時,我第一次看到這隻貓……我們準備對它實施安樂死。”
She continued: "The drug Pentoject had already been drawn up. Upon entering the room, I was greeted by a sweet young cat which appeared healthy apart from his skin condition."
她繼續說道:“藥物Pentoject已經調製好了。一進房間,迎接我的是一隻可愛的小貓,除了皮膚狀況外,它看起來很健康。”
Dr Parody shared, "I had already done back-to-back euthanasia that morning, as mentioned, and upon seeing a happy young cat, I just could not face another euthanasia."
帕羅迪博士分享道:“正如前面提到的,那天早上我已經連續進行了安樂死,當看到一隻快樂的小貓時,我無法面對另一次安樂死。”
He also remarked, "I think it is important to say here that even though at that point I had been a vet for over 10 years, euthanasias are never easy and you always 'take them home' with you."
他還表示,「我認為在這裡有必要說的是,儘管那時我已經當了十多年的獸醫,但安樂死從來都不是一件容易的事,你總是『把它們帶回家』。 」
In relation to the incident in question, Dr Parody admitted, "I understand that my decision not to euthanise Shadow and instead to treat him without the consent of Ms SM was wrong."
關於該事件,Parody 博士承認,“我明白,我決定不對 Shadow 安樂死,而是在未經 SM 女士同意的情況下對他進行治療,這是錯誤的。”
Conceding the circumstances, he stated, "It was a decision I made on a very, very busy and stressful day and when I thought the cat had no owner but I fully appreciate that was no excuse."
他承認了這一情況,並表示:“這是我在非常非常忙碌和壓力很大的一天做出的決定,當時我認為這隻貓沒有主人,但我完全明白這不是藉口。”
Describing the flow of events, he explained, "Once I had made that one decision, I did not revisit my decision but simply continued to treat the cat as best I could at an extremely stressful time."
在描述事情的發展過程時,他解釋說:“一旦我做出了這個決定,我就沒有重新考慮我的決定,只是在壓力極大的時候繼續盡我所能地對待這隻貓。”
Reflecting on the consequences, Dr Parody acknowledged, "I accept that as a result of my decision and actions that the lady who had brought the cat in and who I now know was SM, was misled into thinking that it had been put to sleep and this is something I very much regret."
在反思後果時,Parody 博士承認,「我承認,由於我的決定和行動,那位帶貓進來的女士(我現在知道她是 SM)被誤導,認為它已被安樂死,並且這是我非常遺憾的事情。
Concerning his judgment, Dr Parody commented, "My actions with regard to this cat all snowballed from my decision to treat the cat on 20 December and not put him to sleep."
關於他的判斷,Parody 博士評論道:“由於我在 12 月 20 日決定治療這隻貓,而不是讓他睡覺,所以我對這隻貓的行動就像滾雪球一樣越滾越大。”
Explaining his rationale, he said: "I know I should not have done this but because the cat was young and the condition curable, I felt that I was acting with the welfare of the cat
在解釋自己的理由時,他說:“我知道我不應該這樣做,但因為這隻貓還年輕,而且病情可以治愈,我覺得我的行為是為了這隻貓的福祉。”
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- 真人快打現在可以在模擬口袋上玩
- 2024-10-08 21:40:01
- 您需要成為 Patreon 支持者才能訪問仍處於測試階段的核心。
-
- 什麼是再生金融(ReFi)?
- 2024-10-08 21:35:15
- 再生金融(ReFi)是一種新的金融形式,旨在解決傳統金融中存在的社會、環境和經濟問題。
-
- 加密貨幣牛市回來了,超高收益的機會也吸引了投資者的錢包
- 2024-10-08 21:35:01
- 毫不奇怪,中心化產品和新興的 DeFi 專案正在牛市中調整其年收益率(APY)。