Lakhimpur Kheri 暴力案：SC 要求地區警察檢查受害者就被告 Ashish Mishra 涉嫌違反保釋條件而提供的新證據的真實性

在註意到受害者和被告雙方都需要提供新證據後，法官蘇裡亞·康德(Surya Kant) 和烏賈爾·布揚(Ujjal Bhuyan) 要求拉金布爾凱裡(Lakhimpur Kheri) 地區警察總監( SP) 提交一份報告，支持或反對上述理由尋求取消被告阿什什·米甚拉的保釋。

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the District Police to verify the authenticity of fresh evidence submitted by the victims regarding the alleged violation of bail conditions by Ashish Mishra, an accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case.

最高法院週一指示地區警察核實受害者提交的有關 Lakhimpur Kheri 暴力案被告 Ashish Mishra 涉嫌違反保釋條件的新證據的真實性。

The Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan noted that both the victims and the accused sought to submit fresh evidence. In light of this, the Court directed the District Superintendent of Police (SP) in Lakhimpur Kheri to file a report either supporting or opposing the grounds seeking cancellation of Ashish Mishra's bail.

法官蘇裡亞·康德 (Surya Kant) 和烏賈爾·布揚 (Ujjal Bhuyan) 指出，受害者和被告都試圖提交新的證據。有鑑於此，法院指示拉金普爾凱里地區警察總監提交一份報告，支持或反對取消阿什什·米甚拉保釋的理由。

"The applicant (victims) seeks cancellation of bail granted to Ashish Mishra. They have relied upon some materials accusing Mishra of misusing cancellation of bail and violating conditions on which bail was granted. Mr. Bhushan, counsel for the complainant, wants to place on record more material. In our view the veracity and genuineness of such material can be gone into by police administration who may then submit a report on support or against the ground seeking cancellation of bail," the Court noted in its order.

「申請人（受害者）尋求取消給予阿什什·米甚拉（Ashish Mishra）的保釋。他們依據一些材料指控米甚拉濫用取消保釋並違反了保釋條件。申訴人的律師 Bhushan 先生希望我們認為，警方可以調查此類材料的真實性和真實性，然後他們可以提交一份關於支持或反對取消保釋的報告，」法院在其命令中指出。

The Court listed the matter to be heard next in four weeks time.

法院列出了四個星期後將審理的案件。

Senior Advocate Siddhartha Dave, appearing for Mishra, refuted the allegations against his client, asserting that the victims' side frequently makes such claims. On the other hand, Advocate Prashant Bhushan stated that one of the witnesses in the case is willing to testify against Mishra, alleging that he was instructed not to provide evidence against the accused.

為米甚拉出庭的高級辯護律師悉達多·戴夫駁斥了針對其委託人的指控，聲稱受害者方經常提出此類指控。另一方面，辯護律師 Prashant Bhushan 表示，該案的一名證人願意出庭指證米甚拉，聲稱他被指示不要提供不利於被告的證據。

The top court had earlier asked Mishra to respond to the allegations of threatening witnesses in the case against him in November last year.

最高法院早些時候曾要求米甚拉對去年 11 月針對他的案件中威脅證人的指控做出回應。

The Court had earlier modified the interim bail conditions of Mishra, permitting him to stay either in Delhi or Lucknow. Further, it had also issued directions to expedite the trial in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case and made its interim order absolute.

法院早些時候修改了米甚拉的臨時保釋條件，允許他留在德里或勒克瑙。此外，它還發布了加速 Lakhimpur Kheri 暴力案審判的指示，並使其臨時命令成為絕對命令。

Mishra was granted interim bail by the top court for eight weeks in January 2023, subject to various conditions. The bail was later extended on multiple occasions.

2023 年 1 月，米甚拉獲最高法院暫時保釋八週，但須遵守各種條件。後來，保釋期多次延長。

The Court had directed Mishra to notify the concerned court of his location. It had also clarified that any attempt by Ashish Mishra or his family to influence witnesses and try to delay the trial may lead to cancellation of his bail. The court further directed Mishra to mark his attendance at the concerned police station of his location.

法院指示米甚拉將他的位置通知有關法院。它還澄清說，阿什什·米甚拉或他的家人試圖影響證人並試圖推遲審判可能會導致他的保釋被取消。法院還指示米甚拉在其所在地的相關警察局記錄他的出勤情況。

Son of former Union Minister Ajay Mishra, Ashish Mishra approached the Supreme Court challenging the Allahabad High Court, which denied bail to him in connection with the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case.

阿什什·米甚拉(Ashish Mishra) 是前聯邦部長阿賈伊·米甚拉(Ajay Mishra) 的兒子，他向最高法院提出質疑，阿拉哈巴德高等法院拒絕了他因Lakhimpur Kheri 暴力案而保釋的請求。

The bail was denied by the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court in March 2022. Later, Ashish Mishra moved the Supreme Court against the said order, which was filed through advocate on record T. Mahipal. Mishra is facing a murder case for the incident that took place on October 3, 2021, in which eight people, including four farmers, were killed in Lakhimpur Kheri.

2022 年3 月，阿拉哈巴德高等法院勒克瑙法官駁回了保釋請求。提交的命令。米甚拉因 2021 年 10 月 3 日發生在拉金布爾凱裡 (Lakhimpur Kheri) 的事件導致 8 人死亡，其中包括 4 名農民，因此面臨謀殺案。

Mishra allegedly ran over the farmers who were protesting against the Centre's three farm laws. He was arrested on October 9 and granted bail in February 2022.

據稱，米甚拉碾壓了抗議該中心三項農業法的農民。他於 10 月 9 日被捕，並於 2022 年 2 月獲准保釋。

Mishra again approached the High Court after the Supreme Court set aside the court's earlier order in April 2022 and ordered fresh consideration of his bail plea.

在最高法院撤銷法院早先於 2022 年 4 月發出的命令並下令重新考慮他的保釋請求後，米甚拉再次向高等法院求助。

The top court had earlier set aside the Allahabad High Court order dated February 10, 2022, and remitted the matter back to the High Court. The top court observed that the order of the Allahabad High Court could not be sustained and had to be set aside, and the bail bonds of the respondent/accused were cancelled. The Court directed Ashish Mishra to surrender within a week.

最高法院早些時候撤銷了阿拉哈巴德高等法院 2022 年 2 月 10 日的命令，並將此事發回高等法院。最高法院認為，阿拉哈巴德高等法院的命令不能維持，必須撤銷，並取消被告/被告的保釋金。法院指示阿希什·米甚拉在一周內投降。

The family members of the victims of the Lakhimpur Kheri incident approached the Supreme Court, challenging the Allahabad High Court order, which granted bail to Ashish Mishra. At the time, the top court had cancelled Mishra's bail plea.

Lakhimpur Kheri 事件受害者家屬向最高法院提出上訴，質疑阿拉哈巴德高等法院允許阿什什·米甚拉 (Ashish Mishra) 保釋的命令。當時，最高法院取消了米甚拉的保釋請求。

Earlier, the Court had appointed a committee headed by former Punjab and Haryana High Court judge Rakesh Kumar Jain to monitor the probe into the Lakhimpur Kheri violence. (ANI)

早些時候，法院任命了一個由前旁遮普邦和哈里亞納邦高等法院法官拉克什·庫馬爾·賈恩(Rakesh Kumar Jain) 領導的委員會，負責監督對拉金布爾·凱裡(Lakhimpur Kheri) 暴力事件的調查。 （阿尼）