傑森·卡拉卡尼斯（Jason Calacanis）批評邁克爾·塞勒（Michael Saylor）的侵略性比特幣策略

在X上的一篇文章中，科技企業家和播客主持人傑森·卡拉卡尼斯（Jason Calacanis）對邁克爾·塞勒（Michael Saylor）的侵略性比特幣戰略提出了批評。

Tech entrepreneur and podcast host Jason Calacanis has expressed his opinion on Michael Saylor’s BTC strategy in a post on X. According to Calacanis, Saylor's actions could be setting up the perfect opportunity for someone to launch 'a better bitcoin.'

科技企業家和播客主持人傑森·卡拉卡尼斯（Jason Calacanis）在X上的一篇文章中對邁克爾·塞勒（Michael Saylor）的BTC策略表示了看法。

"I think Saylor is setting up the perfect opportunity for someone to launch "a better bitcoin,"' part of the post reads.

“我認為塞勒（Saylor）為某人開設了一個更好的比特幣。”

According to Calacanis, Saylor's "relentless pumping" of bitcoin, and his "high-risk accumulation techniques" are damaging the Bitcoin ecosystem and brand. There is "too much centralization, too much hyperbole and too many conflicts."

根據卡拉卡尼斯（Calacanis）的說法，塞勒（Saylor）對比特幣的“無情抽水”及其“高風險積累技術”正在損害比特幣生態系統和品牌。 “集中化太多，誇張和太多的衝突”。

The criticism comes after Saylor delivered a keynote at the Bitcoin For America event, organized by the Bitcoin Policy Institute, where US Senator Cynthia Lummis announced her intention to re-introduce a proposed "Bitcoin Act."

在塞勒（Saylor）在比特幣政策研究所組織的《美國比特幣活動》中發表了主題演講之後，美國參議員辛西婭·盧米斯（Cynthia Lummis）宣布打算重新引入一項擬議的“比特幣法案”。

During his speech, Saylor spoke about how the government could purchase one million BTC over five years. The timing also coincides with the announcement by Saylor's company, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) that it will continue buying massive amounts of BTC, even though it already owns nearly 500,000 BTC. Earlier this week, Saylor disclosed that Strategy would be raising additional capital through an at-the-market (ATM) stock offering of up to $21 billion in preferred shares, largely to continue its treasury practice of accumulating more Bitcoin.

在演講中，塞勒談到了政府如何在五年內購買100萬BTC。時間安排還與塞勒公司（Saylor's Company）的宣布，戰略（以前是微型策略），即即使它已經擁有近500,000 BTC，它將繼續購買大量BTC。本週早些時候，塞勒（Saylor）透露，戰略將通過市場上的股票（ATM）股票籌集額外的資本，該股票的優先股最高為210億美元，主要是繼續其累積更多比特幣的國庫業務。

Is Saylor Hurting Bitcoin?

Saylor會傷害比特幣嗎？

Saylor's enthusiastic advocacy has undoubtedly propelled unprecedented corporate investment into BTC. However, Calacanis fears that such a heavy concentration of BTC in one entity's hands, and the rhetoric around it, might threaten Bitcoin's decentralized ethos and create an opening for alternatives.

塞勒的熱情倡導無疑已將前所未有的公司投資推向了BTC。然而，卡拉卡尼斯（Calacanis）擔心如此大量的BTC在一個實體的手中，以及周圍的言論可能威脅比特幣的分散精神，並為替代方案創造一個空缺。

However, veteran Bitcoiner and VP of Research at Riot Platforms (NASDAQ:RIIF), Inc (NYSE:RIIF)Pierre Rochard has responded to Calacanis's claims in a lengthy post on X. According to Rochard, BTC's core architecture provides ample protection against being commandeered by any single influential figure—no matter how large their BTC holdings might be.

但是，Riot Platforms（NASDAQ：RIIF），INC（NYSE：RIIF）Pierre Rochard在Rochard在X上的漫長帖子中對主張的主張做出了回應。BTC的核心建築對任何有影響力的人的指揮，對任何有影響力的人都可以掌握，對BTC的支持很大，

Highlighting BTC's resilience and decentralization, Rochard stated: "Bitcoin's design is fundamentally decentralized, with a proof-of-work mechanism and a global network of node operators. Even someone amassing a vast fortune in BTC cannot unilaterally alter the consensus rules or force node operators and miners to accept any protocol changes."

羅查德（Rochard）強調了BTC的韌性和權力下放化，他說：“比特幣的設計從根本上是分散的，具有工作證明機制和全球節點操作員的網絡。即使有人在BTC中積累了巨大的財富，也無法單方面地改變共識規則或武力節點的規則或武力節點，並接受任何協議。”

He further explained that this "rules-based framework means the system's security is founded on a transparent, open-source protocol, which anyone has the freedom to examine and contribute to. Even a prominent voice or a single large holder is subject to the same validation and consensus processes as all other participants."

他進一步解釋說，“基於規則的框架”意味著該系統的安全是建立在透明的開源協議上的，任何人都有自由檢查和貢獻的。即使是一個著名的聲音或一個大型持有人也受到與所有其他參與者相同的驗證和共識過程。”

Shifting his focus to what he sees as the true sources of BTC's strength, Rochard emphasized the technology's predictable issuance model, cryptographic security, and deeply ingrained community: "While it's true that a figure like Michael Saylor can attract attention and capital to the market, Bitcoin's value proposition does not hinge on a single spokesperson. Rather, it stems from fundamental properties like a predictable issuance schedule, global accessibility, cryptographic security, and a robust community of decentralized node operators. Large-scale accumulation or aggressive 'pumping' cannot overrule the network's neutral treatment of all transactions or inflate Bitcoin's supply beyond the consensus rules."

羅查德（Rochard）將重點轉移到了他所視為BTC力量的真實來源上，他強調了該技術的可預測發行模型，加密安全性和深深的社區：“雖然邁克爾·塞勒（Michael Saylor）這樣的人物確實可以吸引人們的注意力和資本來吸引市場，但比特幣的價值不會像單個發言人那樣，而不是整體上的，而不是整體上的。安全性和一個強大的分散節點運營商的社區。

Addressing the risk that large holders might skew or undermine the ecosystem, Rochard highlighted BTC's past resilience in the face of various crises—ranging from major exchange collapses to high-profile forks: "Critiques that such behavior would 'damage the ecosystem' fail to recognize Bitcoin's resilience throughout crises like exchange failures and protocol forks. Despite these events, Bitcoin has remained online with no downtime and continues to be maintained by a decentralized community, which is ultimately responsible for validating transactions and securing the network."

Addressing the risk that large holders might skew or undermine the ecosystem, Rochard highlighted BTC's past resilience in the face of various crises—ranging from major exchange collapses to high-profile forks: "Critiques that such behavior would 'damage the ecosystem' fail to recognize Bitcoin's resilience throughout crises like exchange failures and protocol forks. Despite these events, Bitcoin has remained online with no downtime and continues由一個分散的社區維護，該社區最終負責驗證交易和確保網絡。”

Rochard went on to note that BTC ownership is more widely distributed “than the headlines suggest,” adding that “ownership itself does not confer control over the consensus rules, and the public's ability to self-custody coins means they can choose not to interact with any entity performing custodial or intelligent leveraged activities."

羅沙德（Rochard）繼續指出，BTC所有權比頭條新聞更廣泛地分佈，並補充說：“所有權本身並不能賦予對共識規則的控制權，而公眾的自我顧客硬幣的能力則意味著他們可以選擇與任何執行保管或智能槓桿活動的實體互動。”

Finally, he dismissed claims that an alternative cryptocurrency could easily displace BTC: "The notion of making a 'better bitcoin' by forking the code or inventing a new cryptocurrency is possible in theory but difficult in practice. Bitcoin stands as the first successfully deployed decentralized digital currency, holding a unique position due to network effects, global liquidity, and a long history of secure operation."

最後，他駁回了說法，即另一種加密貨幣可以輕鬆地取代BTC：“在理論上可能很困難，但在實踐中很難實現'更好的比特幣'的概念，但在實踐中很困難。作為首次成功部署的數字貨幣，由於網絡效應，由於效應網絡的獨特位置，全球性水平且較長的流動效果，並且曾經是較長的效果，並且曾經是較長的效果。

The statement comes as part of a broader discussion on decentralized finance (DeFi) and the future of cryptocurrency. As BTC continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how these issues play out and how the cryptocurrency community responds to them.

該聲明是關於分散財務（DEFI）和加密貨幣未來的更廣泛討論的一部分。隨著BTC的不斷發展，看到這些問題如何解決以及加密貨幣社區如何對其做出反應將很有趣。

Finally, Rochard's statement highlighted the permissionless nature of BTC and how participants operate on open-source rules. He added that incidents prompting skepticism often spur heightened community

最後，羅查德（Rochard）的聲明強調了BTC的無權性質以及參與者如何根據開源規則運作。他補充說，促使懷疑主義的事件常常激發社區的增長