杰森·卡拉卡尼斯（Jason Calacanis）批评迈克尔·塞勒（Michael Saylor）的侵略性比特币策略

在X上的一篇文章中，科技企业家和播客主持人杰森·卡拉卡尼斯（Jason Calacanis）对迈克尔·塞勒（Michael Saylor）的侵略性比特币战略提出了批评。

Tech entrepreneur and podcast host Jason Calacanis has expressed his opinion on Michael Saylor’s BTC strategy in a post on X. According to Calacanis, Saylor's actions could be setting up the perfect opportunity for someone to launch 'a better bitcoin.'

科技企业家和播客主持人杰森·卡拉卡尼斯（Jason Calacanis）在X上的一篇文章中对迈克尔·塞勒（Michael Saylor）的BTC策略表示了看法。

"I think Saylor is setting up the perfect opportunity for someone to launch "a better bitcoin,"' part of the post reads.

“我认为塞勒（Saylor）为某人开设了一个更好的比特币。”

According to Calacanis, Saylor's "relentless pumping" of bitcoin, and his "high-risk accumulation techniques" are damaging the Bitcoin ecosystem and brand. There is "too much centralization, too much hyperbole and too many conflicts."

根据卡拉卡尼斯（Calacanis）的说法，塞勒（Saylor）对比特币的“无情抽水”及其“高风险积累技术”正在损害比特币生态系统和品牌。 “集中化太多，夸张和太多的冲突”。

The criticism comes after Saylor delivered a keynote at the Bitcoin For America event, organized by the Bitcoin Policy Institute, where US Senator Cynthia Lummis announced her intention to re-introduce a proposed "Bitcoin Act."

在塞勒（Saylor）在比特币政策研究所组织的《美国比特币活动》中发表了主题演讲之后，美国参议员辛西娅·卢米斯（Cynthia Lummis）宣布打算重新引入一项拟议的“比特币法案”。

During his speech, Saylor spoke about how the government could purchase one million BTC over five years. The timing also coincides with the announcement by Saylor's company, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) that it will continue buying massive amounts of BTC, even though it already owns nearly 500,000 BTC. Earlier this week, Saylor disclosed that Strategy would be raising additional capital through an at-the-market (ATM) stock offering of up to $21 billion in preferred shares, largely to continue its treasury practice of accumulating more Bitcoin.

在演讲中，塞勒谈到了政府如何在五年内购买100万BTC。时间安排还与塞勒公司（Saylor's Company）的宣布，战略（以前是微型策略），即即使它已经拥有近500,000 BTC，它将继续购买大量BTC。本周早些时候，塞勒（Saylor）透露，战略将通过市场上的股票（ATM）股票筹集额外的资本，该股票的优先股最高为210亿美元，主要是继续其累积更多比特币的国库业务。

Is Saylor Hurting Bitcoin?

Saylor会伤害比特币吗？

Saylor's enthusiastic advocacy has undoubtedly propelled unprecedented corporate investment into BTC. However, Calacanis fears that such a heavy concentration of BTC in one entity's hands, and the rhetoric around it, might threaten Bitcoin's decentralized ethos and create an opening for alternatives.

塞勒的热情倡导无疑已将前所未有的公司投资推向了BTC。然而，卡拉卡尼斯（Calacanis）担心如此大量的BTC在一个实体的手中，以及周围的言论可能威胁比特币的分散精神，并为替代方案创造一个空缺。

However, veteran Bitcoiner and VP of Research at Riot Platforms (NASDAQ:RIIF), Inc (NYSE:RIIF)Pierre Rochard has responded to Calacanis's claims in a lengthy post on X. According to Rochard, BTC's core architecture provides ample protection against being commandeered by any single influential figure—no matter how large their BTC holdings might be.

但是，Riot Platforms（NASDAQ：RIIF），INC（NYSE：RIIF）Pierre Rochard在Rochard在X上的漫长帖子中对主张的主张做出了回应。BTC的核心建筑对任何有影响力的人的指挥，对任何有影响力的人都可以掌握，对BTC的支持很大，

Highlighting BTC's resilience and decentralization, Rochard stated: "Bitcoin's design is fundamentally decentralized, with a proof-of-work mechanism and a global network of node operators. Even someone amassing a vast fortune in BTC cannot unilaterally alter the consensus rules or force node operators and miners to accept any protocol changes."

罗查德（Rochard）强调了BTC的韧性和权力下放化，他说：“比特币的设计从根本上是分散的，具有工作证明机制和全球节点操作员的网络。即使有人在BTC中积累了巨大的财富，也无法单方面地改变共识规则或武力节点的规则或武力节点，并接受任何协议。”

He further explained that this "rules-based framework means the system's security is founded on a transparent, open-source protocol, which anyone has the freedom to examine and contribute to. Even a prominent voice or a single large holder is subject to the same validation and consensus processes as all other participants."

他进一步解释说，“基于规则的框架”意味着该系统的安全是建立在透明的开源协议上的，任何人都有自由检查和贡献的。即使是一个著名的声音或一个大型持有人也受到与所有其他参与者相同的验证和共识过程。”

Shifting his focus to what he sees as the true sources of BTC's strength, Rochard emphasized the technology's predictable issuance model, cryptographic security, and deeply ingrained community: "While it's true that a figure like Michael Saylor can attract attention and capital to the market, Bitcoin's value proposition does not hinge on a single spokesperson. Rather, it stems from fundamental properties like a predictable issuance schedule, global accessibility, cryptographic security, and a robust community of decentralized node operators. Large-scale accumulation or aggressive 'pumping' cannot overrule the network's neutral treatment of all transactions or inflate Bitcoin's supply beyond the consensus rules."

罗查德（Rochard）将重点转移到了他所视为BTC力量的真实来源上，他强调了该技术的可预测发行模型，加密安全性和深深的社区：“虽然迈克尔·塞勒（Michael Saylor）这样的人物确实可以吸引人们的注意力和资本来吸引市场，但比特币的价值不会像单个发言人那样，而不是整体上的，而不是整体上的。安全性和一个强大的分散节点运营商的社区。

Addressing the risk that large holders might skew or undermine the ecosystem, Rochard highlighted BTC's past resilience in the face of various crises—ranging from major exchange collapses to high-profile forks: "Critiques that such behavior would 'damage the ecosystem' fail to recognize Bitcoin's resilience throughout crises like exchange failures and protocol forks. Despite these events, Bitcoin has remained online with no downtime and continues to be maintained by a decentralized community, which is ultimately responsible for validating transactions and securing the network."

Addressing the risk that large holders might skew or undermine the ecosystem, Rochard highlighted BTC's past resilience in the face of various crises—ranging from major exchange collapses to high-profile forks: "Critiques that such behavior would 'damage the ecosystem' fail to recognize Bitcoin's resilience throughout crises like exchange failures and protocol forks. Despite these events, Bitcoin has remained online with no downtime and continues由一个分散的社区维护，该社区最终负责验证交易和确保网络。”

Rochard went on to note that BTC ownership is more widely distributed “than the headlines suggest,” adding that “ownership itself does not confer control over the consensus rules, and the public's ability to self-custody coins means they can choose not to interact with any entity performing custodial or intelligent leveraged activities."

罗沙德（Rochard）继续指出，BTC所有权比头条新闻更广泛地分布，并补充说：“所有权本身并不能赋予对共识规则的控制权，而公众的自我顾客硬币的能力则意味着他们可以选择与任何执行保管或智能杠杆活动的实体互动。”

Finally, he dismissed claims that an alternative cryptocurrency could easily displace BTC: "The notion of making a 'better bitcoin' by forking the code or inventing a new cryptocurrency is possible in theory but difficult in practice. Bitcoin stands as the first successfully deployed decentralized digital currency, holding a unique position due to network effects, global liquidity, and a long history of secure operation."

最后，他驳回了说法，即另一种加密货币可以轻松地取代BTC：“在理论上可能很困难，但在实践中很难实现'更好的比特币'的概念，但在实践中很困难。作为首次成功部署的数字货币，由于网络效应，由于效应网络的独特位置，全球性水平且较长的流动效果，并且曾经是较长的效果，并且曾经是较长的效果。

The statement comes as part of a broader discussion on decentralized finance (DeFi) and the future of cryptocurrency. As BTC continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how these issues play out and how the cryptocurrency community responds to them.

该声明是关于分散财务（DEFI）和加密货币未来的更广泛讨论的一部分。随着BTC的不断发展，看到这些问题如何解决以及加密货币社区如何对其做出反应将很有趣。

Finally, Rochard's statement highlighted the permissionless nature of BTC and how participants operate on open-source rules. He added that incidents prompting skepticism often spur heightened community

最后，罗查德（Rochard）的声明强调了BTC的无权性质以及参与者如何根据开源规则运作。他补充说，促使怀疑主义的事件常常激发社区的增长