以太坊巨頭 ConsenSys 因「非法奪權」起訴 SEC

以太坊開發商 Consensys 對 SEC 提起訴訟，指控其「非法奪取以太坊權力」。該公司辯稱，ETH 不是證券，MetaMask 不是經紀人，SEC 的行為侵犯了其憲法權利。 Consensys 尋求聲明 ETH 不是證券、針對 SEC 調查的禁令以及對 MetaMask 服務的保護。

Ethereum Developer ConsenSys Files Lawsuit Against SEC Over 'Unlawful Seizure of Authority'

以太幣開發商 ConsenSys 就「非法奪權」向 SEC 提起訴訟

In a bold move that challenges the boundaries of regulatory authority, Ethereum developer ConsenSys has filed a lawsuit against the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), accusing the federal regulator of an "unlawful seizure of authority" over the Ethereum network.

以太坊開發商ConsenSys向美國證券交易委員會（SEC）提起訴訟，指責聯邦監管機構“非法奪取以太坊網絡的權力”，這是挑戰監管機構界限的大膽舉措。

According to ConsenSys, the SEC has overstepped its mandate by asserting that Ethereum (ETH) is a security, a designation that would impose significant burdens and restrictions on the Ethereum ecosystem. The lawsuit seeks to clarify the regulatory status of ETH, prevent the SEC from investigating ConsenSys on the basis of this categorization, and restrain the agency from taking enforcement actions against MetaMask, a non-custodial cryptocurrency wallet developed by ConsenSys.

據 ConsenSys 稱，美國證券交易委員會聲稱以太坊（ETH）是一種證券，這一名稱將給以太坊生態系統帶來重大負擔和限制，從而超越了其職責。該訴訟旨在澄清 ETH 的監管狀況，阻止 SEC 根據此分類對 ConsenSys 進行調查，並限制該機構對 ConsenSys 開發的非託管加密貨幣錢包 MetaMask 採取執法行動。

ConsenSys maintains that ETH is a commodity, not a security, and that the SEC's recent shift in stance on this issue violates the "fair notice under the Due Process Clause" of the Constitution. The company cites previous statements by the SEC, including a 2018 speech by former director Bill Hinman, which indicated that Ethereum was not a security.

ConsenSys 堅稱 ETH 是一種商品，而不是一種證券，並且 SEC 最近在此問題上的立場轉變違反了憲法的「正當程序條款下的公平通知」。該公司引用了 SEC 先前的聲明，包括前董事 Bill Hinman 2018 年的講話，該講話表明以太坊不是證券。

Furthermore, ConsenSys argues that the SEC's assertion of authority over Ethereum conflicts with the jurisdiction of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which traditionally regulates derivative products tied to commodities. The lawsuit invokes the "major questions doctrine," a Supreme Court ruling that limits the ability of federal regulators to extend their authority beyond the scope of their Congressional mandates.

此外，ConsenSys 認為 SEC 對以太坊的權威主張與商品期貨交易委員會 (CFTC) 的管轄權相衝突，該委員會傳統上監管與商品相關的衍生產品。該訴訟援引了最高法院的一項裁決“重大問題原則”，該裁決限制了聯邦監管機構將其權力擴展到國會授權範圍之外的能力。

The complaint, filed in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas, alleges that the SEC's actions against ConsenSys would "spell disaster for the Ethereum network" and would have a chilling effect on innovation and development in the cryptocurrency space.

該訴狀向德克薩斯州北區地方法院提起，聲稱 SEC 針對 ConsenSys 的行動將“給以太坊網絡帶來災難”，並對加密貨幣領域的創新和發展產生寒蟬效應。

In addition to seeking a declaration that ETH is not a security, ConsenSys is requesting that the court recognize MetaMask as a non-broker that does not violate securities law. The lawsuit also seeks to enjoin the SEC from investigating or taking enforcement actions related to MetaMask's "Swaps" or "Staking" functions.

除了尋求 ETH 不是證券的聲明外，ConsenSys 還要求法院承認 MetaMask 為不違反證券法的非經紀商。該訴訟還試圖禁止 SEC 調查或採取與 MetaMask 的「互換」或「質押」功能相關的執法行動。

The SEC declined to comment on the lawsuit, citing its policy of not commenting on pending litigation.

美國證券交易委員會拒絕對該訴訟發表評論，理由是其政策不對未決訴訟發表評論。

ConsenSys's lawsuit represents a growing trend of legal challenges to the SEC's authority over cryptocurrencies. In recent months, the SEC has filed suit against several cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance.US, Binance, and Kraken. Uniswap Labs, another leading decentralized exchange, recently revealed that it had also received a Wells Notice from the regulator, indicating a possible enforcement action.

ConsenSys 的訴訟代表了對 SEC 對加密貨幣權威的法律挑戰日益增長的趨勢。近幾個月來，SEC 對多家加密貨幣交易所提起訴訟，包括 Binance.US、Binance 和 Kraken。另一家領先的去中心化交易所 Uniswap Labs 最近透露，它還收到了監管機構的 Wells 通知，表明可能採取執法行動。

The outcome of ConsenSys's lawsuit could have significant implications for the cryptocurrency industry and for the relationship between regulators and crypto companies. If successful, the lawsuit could limit the SEC's ability to regulate Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies and could provide clarity on the regulatory landscape for the industry.

ConsenSys 訴訟的結果可能會對加密貨幣產業以及監管機構與加密公司之間的關係產生重大影響。如果成功，該訴訟可能會限制美國證券交易委員會監管以太坊和其他加密貨幣的能力，並可能為該行業的監管環境提供清晰的資訊。

Key Points

關鍵點

• ConsenSys, the developer of Ethereum, has filed a lawsuit against the SEC, alleging "unlawful seizure of authority" over ETH.
• The lawsuit seeks to declare ETH a commodity, not a security, and to prevent the SEC from investigating or taking action against MetaMask.
• ConsenSys argues that the SEC's stance on ETH violates its own previous statements and conflicts with the jurisdiction of the CFTC.
• Legal challenges to the SEC's authority over cryptocurrencies are increasing, with several industry players filing lawsuits or receiving Wells Notices.
• The outcome of ConsenSys's lawsuit could have major implications for the cryptocurrency industry and the regulatory landscape for crypto companies.

以太坊開發商 ConsenSys 對 SEC 提起訴訟，指控其「非法奪取 ETH 的權力」。違反了其先前的聲明，並且與CFTC 的管轄權相衝突。產業和加密公司的監管環境產生重大影響。