美國第二巡迴法院的上訴法院在很大程度上裁定統治的統治下

美國第二巡迴上訴法院在周三發布了一項裁決，很大程度上同意下級法院的2023年決定，決定針對分散的交易所UNISWAP提出集體訴訟訴訟。

A U.S. federal appeals court on Wednesday largely upheld a lower court's decision to dismiss a class action lawsuit against decentralized exchange Uniswap.

美國聯邦上訴法院週三在很大程度上維持了下級法院決定駁回對分散式交易所UNISWAP的集體訴訟的決定。

A group of investors sued Uniswap Labs, the company behind the decentralized protocol of the same name, and some of its venture capital investors in 2022. They alleged that the company was responsible for harming investors by allowing scam tokens to be issued on its protocol.

一群投資者起訴UNISWAP實驗室，該公司在同名分散協議背後的公司以及2022年的一些風險投資投資者。

However, District Court Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) sided with Uniswap and scrapped the suit before it went to trial, likening the plaintiffs' arguments to "a suit attempting to hold an application like Venmo or Zelle liable for a drug deal that used the crypto application to facilitate a fund transfer."

然而，紐約南部地區（SDNY）的地方法院法官凱瑟琳·波克·法拉（Katherine Polk Failla）站在unistwap上，並在訴訟之前取消了訴訟，將原告的論點比作“試圖持有Venmo或Zelle責任諸如使用該毒品交易的申請的訴訟，該申請責任使用該毒品交易，該申請使用加密貨幣來促進資金轉移。”

Plaintiffs appealed Failla's ruling in September 2023, but were largely shut down by the fresh decision from the Second Circuit. The Second Circuit judges affirmed Failla's decision to throw out the plaintiffs' claims under both the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, writing:

原告在2023年9月提出上訴法拉（Failla）的裁決，但第二巡迴法院的新決定在很大程度上被關閉了。第二巡迴法官確認，法拉（Failla）決定根據《證券法》和《交易法》（Exchange Act）拋出原告的主張：

"In sum, we agree with the district court that it 'defies logic' that a drafter of a smart contract, a computer code, could be held liable under the Exchange Act for a third party user’s misuse of the platform," the filing read.

申請書“總而言，我們同意地方法院的意見，即'違反邏輯'的智能合同（計算機代碼）可以根據《交易法》對第三方用戶濫用該平台的責任承擔責任。”

The only part of Failla's ruling that was vacated and remanded back to a district court - meaning the lower court will hear this sliver of the the plaintiffs' case again - were the state law claims, which essentially seek to try similar allegations under state, rather than federal law, in New York, North Carolina and Idaho.

法拉（Failla）裁決的唯一部分已被撤離並退回地方法院 - 這意味著下級法院將再次聽到原告案件的這一要求，是州法律要求，該要求基本上試圖在紐約，北卡羅來納州和愛達荷州在州而不是聯邦法律下嘗試類似的指控，而不是州法律。

The ruling is a win for Uniswap, fresh off the heels of Tuesday's announcement that the U.S. Securities and SEC would drop its investigation into the decentralized exchange which, under former SEC Chairman Gary Gensler, was being probed for allegedly operating as an unregistered securities broker and unregistered securities exchange, as well as issuing an unregistered security.

這項裁決是單稅的勝利，剛從周二宣布的宣布美國證券和SEC將對分散的交易所進行調查的後續行動的勝利，這是在前SEC董事長加里·蓋斯勒（Gary Gensler）的領導下，被調查，據稱據稱是作為未登記的證券經紀人和未註冊的證券交易所運營的，並簽發了未註冊的安全保障。