这是$狼地毯的发生方式，以及如何避免下一个

在我们深入研究之前，如果您能打开跟随并重新发布，我会很喜欢它！我在研究中付出了很多努力，这意味着您在传播这些自由知识方面的支持非常重要！

The recent saga of the $WOLF token, which quickly rose to prominence only to experience an equally swift downfall, has been a subject of much discussion and analysis.

$狼代币最近的传奇很快就引起了人们的关注，只是经历同样迅速的衰落，一直是讨论和分析的主题。

At the heart of this tale is Hayden Davis, a figure already infamous for his role in the $LIBRA and #MELANIA tokens, both of which ended badly for retail investors.

这个故事的核心是海顿·戴维斯（Hayden Davis），他在$ libra和#Melania代币中的角色已经臭名昭著，这两个人对零售投资者的结局差不多。

Despite being on Interpol's Red Notice and Argentina pursuing him for the $LIBRA fraud, Davis managed to launch another token. This time it was $WOLF, a meme coin that quickly gained attention due to rumors of Jordan Belfort launching his own crypto and the subsequent meme coin frenzy that saw opportunists making tokens and linking them to Belfort.

尽管发表国际刑警组织的红色通知，而阿根廷则追捕他，但戴维斯设法推出了另一个令牌。这次是$ Wolf，这是一种模因硬币，由于乔丹·贝尔福（Jordan Belfort）推出了自己的加密货币和随后的模因硬币疯狂而迅速引起了人们的关注，这些硬币是机会主义者创造了代币并将其链接到贝尔福特（Belfort）。

Several $WOLF tokens emerged, with one linked to Davis and another linked to a crypto influencer. The tokens were widely discussed in crypto circles, and they were also promoted by the traders and community on the popular investing platform,wallstreetbets, further boosting the token's profile and leading to a March 8 debut that saw the token's market cap reach $40 million.

几个$ Wolf代币出现了，其中一个与戴维斯有关，另一个与加密影响者有关。代币在Crypto Circles中得到了广泛讨论，并且在受欢迎的投资平台Wallstreetbets上的商人和社区也推广了这些代币，进一步提高了令牌的概况，并导致3月8日的首次亮相，使Token的市值达到4000万美元。

However, the excitement was short-lived as $WOLF's price soon began to plummet due to a suspected rug-pull.

但是，由于怀疑的地毯，$ Wolf的价格很快开始下降，因此这种兴奋是短暂的。

On-chain data from Tokenview revealed that the $WOLF operation had enriched insiders, with 82% of the tokens held by 10 wallets out of a total supply of 1 quadrillion, highlighting the level of control that Davis and his associates had over the token.

Tokenview的链链数据表明，$ WOLF的运营丰富了内部人士，其中82％的代币持有10个钱包的总供应，总供应总额为1四千亿美元，强调了戴维斯及其同事在代币上拥有的控制水平。

This pattern aligns closely with Davis's past ventures, such as his involvement in the $HOOD token. In that instance, several wallets related to Davis began accumulating supply of the token shortly after it began trading.

这种模式与戴维斯过去的冒险活动紧密相吻合，例如他参与$ hood doken。在这种情况下，几个与戴维斯有关的钱包开始在交易交易后不久就开始积累了代币的供应。

These wallets, which appear to belong to Davis and his associates, were actively buying up the token and placing limit orders to keep the price rising. Once they had amassed a significant amount of supply, they began selling the token and draining liquidity, causing the price to collapse and leaving retail investors holding worthless tokens.

这些钱包似乎属于戴维斯及其同事，正在积极购买令牌并下达限额订单以保持价格上涨。一旦积累了大量供应，他们就开始出售令牌并排出流动性，导致价格崩溃，并使散户投资者持有毫无价值的代币。

In essence, Davis's tactics of "developer sniping" and "liquidity rug-pulling" appear to have been applied to the $WOLF token, which had no whitepaper or credible team information other than rumors linking it to Belfort and a lack of transparency throughout the entire operation.

本质上，戴维斯（Davis）的“开发人员狙击”和“流动性地毯”的策略似乎已应用于$ Wolf代币，除了将其与贝尔福（Belfort）联系起来的谣言外，没有任何白皮书或可靠的团队信息，并且在整个整个操作中都缺乏透明度。

The fact that the token was being hyped by Wall Street Bets and Belfort further indicates that it was a quick-profit scheme for its creators rather than a legitimate project with long-term potential.

华尔街赌注和贝尔福尔（Belfort）炒作的令牌这一事实进一步表明，这是其创作者的快速发展计划，而不是具有长期潜力的合法项目。

This lack of transparency and the presence of manipulative activity, such as the insider accumulation and liquidity draining, provide strong evidence that the $WOLF token was a scam designed to defraud retail investors.

这种缺乏透明度和操纵活动的存在，例如内部人士的积累和流动性耗尽，提供了有力的证据，表明$狼代币是旨在欺骗零售投资者的骗局。

It is a stark reminder of the risks involved in investing in meme coins and the importance of conducting due diligence before investing in any token.

这是一个明显地提醒人们投资模因硬币的风险以及在投资任何代币之前进行尽职调查的重要性。

The Supreme Court of New York is set to review the case of the $LIBRA scandal following a new class-action lawsuit that accuses the creators of the token of defrauding investors and draining over $100 million from one-sided liquidity pools.

纽约最高法院将在一项新的集体诉讼诉讼之后审查$天秤座丑闻的案件，该诉讼指控创建者欺骗投资者，并从单面流动性池中浪费了超过1亿美元。

The lawsuit alleges that the creators of $LIBRA, which crashed in April, lied to investors about the token's purpose and technology in order to induce them to invest.

该诉讼称，$ libra的创建者于4月坠毁，向投资者撒谎，以诱使他们进行投资。

It claims that the creators used hype and misinformation to manipulate the price of the token and that they drained liquidity from the token at the peak of the hype, leaving investors with worthless tokens.

它声称创作者使用炒作和错误信息来操纵令牌的价格，并且他们在炒作高峰时从代币中消耗了流动性，使投资者拥有毫无价值的代币。

According to the lawsuit, the creators of $LIBRA were aware that the token had no value and that it was not capable of achieving the claims that they made to investors.

根据诉讼，$ libra的创建者知道，令牌没有价值，并且无法实现他们对投资者的主张。

They are said to have used this knowledge to deceive investors and defraud them out of their money.

据说他们已经利用这些知识来欺骗投资者，并从他们的钱中欺骗他们。

The lawsuit also alleges that the creators of $LIBRA were aided and abetted by several individuals and entities who helped them to carry out their scam.

该诉讼还声称，$ libra的创造者得到了几个帮助他们进行骗局的个人和实体的帮助和教bet。

These individuals and entities are said to have known about the fraudulent nature of the token but chose to assist the creators in defrauding investors.

据说这些个人和实体知道令牌的欺诈性质，但选择协助创作者欺骗投资者。

The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for the investors who were defrauded by the creators of $LIBRA. It also seeks to hold accountable the individuals and entities who helped the creators to carry out their scam.

该诉讼旨在为$ libra创造者欺骗的投资者赔偿损失。它还试图承担责任的个人和实体，这些个人和实体帮助创建者进行骗局。

The case is still in its early stages, but it could have far-reaching implications for the cryptocurrency industry.

该案仍处于早期阶段，但可能对加密货币行业具有深远的影响。

If the investors are successful in their lawsuit, it could set a precedent for holding creators of fraudulent tokens liable for their actions.

如果投资者在诉讼中取得了成功，则可以为使欺诈代币的创建者负责其行为而树立先例。

The case is being watched closely by members of the crypto community, who are interested to see how the court will rule on the claims of fraud and misrepresentation.

加密社区的成员正在密切关注此案，他们有兴趣了解法院将如何裁定欺诈和虚假陈述的主张。

The outcome of the case could have a bearing on how similar cases are handled in the future.

该案件的结果可能与将来的类似情况有关。

Here's a breakdown of the claims made in the lawsuit:

这是诉讼中提出的主张的细分：

* The creators of $LIBRA made false and misleading statements to investors about the token's purpose, technology, and value.

* $ libra的创建者向投资者发表了关于令牌的目的，技术和价值的虚假和误导性陈述。

* The creators of $

* $的创造者