這是$狼地毯的發生方式，以及如何避免下一個

在我們深入研究之前，如果您能打開跟隨並重新發布，我會很喜歡它！我在研究中付出了很多努力，這意味著您在傳播這些自由知識方面的支持非常重要！

The recent saga of the $WOLF token, which quickly rose to prominence only to experience an equally swift downfall, has been a subject of much discussion and analysis.

$狼代幣最近的傳奇很快就引起了人們的關注，只是經歷同樣迅速的衰落，一直是討論和分析的主題。

At the heart of this tale is Hayden Davis, a figure already infamous for his role in the $LIBRA and #MELANIA tokens, both of which ended badly for retail investors.

這個故事的核心是海頓·戴維斯（Hayden Davis），他在$ libra和#Melania代幣中的角色已經臭名昭著，這兩個人對零售投資者的結局差不多。

Despite being on Interpol's Red Notice and Argentina pursuing him for the $LIBRA fraud, Davis managed to launch another token. This time it was $WOLF, a meme coin that quickly gained attention due to rumors of Jordan Belfort launching his own crypto and the subsequent meme coin frenzy that saw opportunists making tokens and linking them to Belfort.

儘管發表國際刑警組織的紅色通知，而阿根廷則追捕他，但戴維斯設法推出了另一個令牌。這次是$ Wolf，這是一種模因硬幣，由於喬丹·貝爾福（Jordan Belfort）推出了自己的加密貨幣和隨後的模因硬幣瘋狂而迅速引起了人們的關注，這些硬幣是機會主義者創造了代幣並將其鏈接到貝爾福特（Belfort）。

Several $WOLF tokens emerged, with one linked to Davis and another linked to a crypto influencer. The tokens were widely discussed in crypto circles, and they were also promoted by the traders and community on the popular investing platform,wallstreetbets, further boosting the token's profile and leading to a March 8 debut that saw the token's market cap reach $40 million.

幾個$ Wolf代幣出現了，其中一個與戴維斯有關，另一個與加密影響者有關。代幣在Crypto Circles中得到了廣泛討論，並且在受歡迎的投資平台Wallstreetbets上的商人和社區也推廣了這些代幣，進一步提高了令牌的概況，並導致3月8日的首次亮相，使Token的市值達到4000萬美元。

However, the excitement was short-lived as $WOLF's price soon began to plummet due to a suspected rug-pull.

但是，由於懷疑的地毯，$ Wolf的價格很快開始下降，因此這種興奮是短暫的。

On-chain data from Tokenview revealed that the $WOLF operation had enriched insiders, with 82% of the tokens held by 10 wallets out of a total supply of 1 quadrillion, highlighting the level of control that Davis and his associates had over the token.

Tokenview的鍊鍊數據表明，$ WOLF的運營豐富了內部人士，其中82％的代幣持有10個錢包的總供應，總供應總額為1四千億美元，強調了戴維斯及其同事在代幣上擁有的控制水平。

This pattern aligns closely with Davis's past ventures, such as his involvement in the $HOOD token. In that instance, several wallets related to Davis began accumulating supply of the token shortly after it began trading.

這種模式與戴維斯過去的冒險活動緊密相吻合，例如他參與$ hood doken。在這種情況下，幾個與戴維斯有關的錢包開始在交易交易後不久就開始積累了代幣的供應。

These wallets, which appear to belong to Davis and his associates, were actively buying up the token and placing limit orders to keep the price rising. Once they had amassed a significant amount of supply, they began selling the token and draining liquidity, causing the price to collapse and leaving retail investors holding worthless tokens.

這些錢包似乎屬於戴維斯及其同事，正在積極購買令牌並下達限額訂單以保持價格上漲。一旦積累了大量供應，他們就開始出售令牌並排出流動性，導致價格崩潰，並使散戶投資者持有毫無價值的代幣。

In essence, Davis's tactics of "developer sniping" and "liquidity rug-pulling" appear to have been applied to the $WOLF token, which had no whitepaper or credible team information other than rumors linking it to Belfort and a lack of transparency throughout the entire operation.

本質上，戴維斯（Davis）的“開發人員狙擊”和“流動性地毯”的策略似乎已應用於$ Wolf代幣，除了將其與貝爾福（Belfort）聯繫起來的謠言外，沒有任何白皮書或可靠的團隊信息，並且在整個整個操作中都缺乏透明度。

The fact that the token was being hyped by Wall Street Bets and Belfort further indicates that it was a quick-profit scheme for its creators rather than a legitimate project with long-term potential.

華爾街賭注和貝爾福爾（Belfort）炒作的令牌這一事實進一步表明，這是其創作者的快速發展計劃，而不是具有長期潛力的合法項目。

This lack of transparency and the presence of manipulative activity, such as the insider accumulation and liquidity draining, provide strong evidence that the $WOLF token was a scam designed to defraud retail investors.

這種缺乏透明度和操縱活動的存在，例如內部人士的積累和流動性耗盡，提供了有力的證據，表明$狼代幣是旨在欺騙零售投資者的騙局。

It is a stark reminder of the risks involved in investing in meme coins and the importance of conducting due diligence before investing in any token.

這是一個明顯地提醒人們投資模因硬幣的風險以及在投資任何代幣之前進行盡職調查的重要性。

The Supreme Court of New York is set to review the case of the $LIBRA scandal following a new class-action lawsuit that accuses the creators of the token of defrauding investors and draining over $100 million from one-sided liquidity pools.

紐約最高法院將在一項新的集體訴訟訴訟之後審查$天秤座醜聞的案件，該訴訟指控創建者欺騙投資者，並從單面流動性池中浪費了超過1億美元。

The lawsuit alleges that the creators of $LIBRA, which crashed in April, lied to investors about the token's purpose and technology in order to induce them to invest.

該訴訟稱，$ libra的創建者於4月墜毀，向投資者撒謊，以誘使他們進行投資。

It claims that the creators used hype and misinformation to manipulate the price of the token and that they drained liquidity from the token at the peak of the hype, leaving investors with worthless tokens.

它聲稱創作者使用炒作和錯誤信息來操縱令牌的價格，並且他們在炒作高峰時從代幣中消耗了流動性，使投資者擁有毫無價值的代幣。

According to the lawsuit, the creators of $LIBRA were aware that the token had no value and that it was not capable of achieving the claims that they made to investors.

根據訴訟，$ libra的創建者知道，令牌沒有價值，並且無法實現他們對投資者的主張。

They are said to have used this knowledge to deceive investors and defraud them out of their money.

據說他們已經利用這些知識來欺騙投資者，並從他們的錢中欺騙他們。

The lawsuit also alleges that the creators of $LIBRA were aided and abetted by several individuals and entities who helped them to carry out their scam.

該訴訟還聲稱，$ libra的創造者得到了幾個幫助他們進行騙局的個人和實體的幫助和教bet。

These individuals and entities are said to have known about the fraudulent nature of the token but chose to assist the creators in defrauding investors.

據說這些個人和實體知道令牌的欺詐性質，但選擇協助創作者欺騙投資者。

The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for the investors who were defrauded by the creators of $LIBRA. It also seeks to hold accountable the individuals and entities who helped the creators to carry out their scam.

該訴訟旨在為$ libra創造者欺騙的投資者賠償損失。它還試圖承擔責任的個人和實體，這些個人和實體幫助創建者進行騙局。

The case is still in its early stages, but it could have far-reaching implications for the cryptocurrency industry.

該案仍處於早期階段，但可能對加密貨幣行業具有深遠的影響。

If the investors are successful in their lawsuit, it could set a precedent for holding creators of fraudulent tokens liable for their actions.

如果投資者在訴訟中取得了成功，則可以為使欺詐代幣的創建者負責其行為而樹立先例。

The case is being watched closely by members of the crypto community, who are interested to see how the court will rule on the claims of fraud and misrepresentation.

加密社區的成員正在密切關注此案，他們有興趣了解法院將如何裁定欺詐和虛假陳述的主張。

The outcome of the case could have a bearing on how similar cases are handled in the future.

該案件的結果可能與將來的類似情況有關。

Here's a breakdown of the claims made in the lawsuit:

這是訴訟中提出的主張的細分：

* The creators of $LIBRA made false and misleading statements to investors about the token's purpose, technology, and value.

* $ libra的創建者向投資者發表了關於令牌的目的，技術和價值的虛假和誤導性陳述。

* The creators of $

* $的創造者