Ripple 在 SEC 诉讼中反击，挑战补救措施和专家证据

地方法官 Sarah Netburn 已为 Ripple 驳回 SEC 在正在进行的诉讼中提出的专家意见的动议制定了时间表。 SEC 已获准将期限延长至 2024 年 4 月 29 日，以便对 Ripple 的动议提出反驳。 Ripple 在其动议中声称 ODL 销售不符合投资特征，并已调整其运营以避免未来违规。与此同时，以太坊开发商 ConsenSys 已对 SEC 提起诉讼，质疑后者对以太坊的权威，这可能会影响 Ripple 案和更广泛的加密市场。

Ripple vs. SEC Lawsuit Update: Ripple Challenges SEC's Remedies and Expert Submissions

Ripple 与 SEC 诉讼更新：Ripple 挑战 SEC 的补救措施和专家意见

In a highly anticipated development, Ripple has filed a motion to dismiss the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) latest expert submissions in their ongoing lawsuit. The crux of Ripple's argument lies in the nature of its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) sales, which the company maintains do not constitute traditional investments but rather represent instantaneous transactions that do not involve holding XRP for long-term investment purposes.

在备受期待的事态发展中，Ripple 已提出动议，驳回美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 在正在进行的诉讼中最新的专家意见。 Ripple 论点的关键在于其按需流动性（ODL）销售的性质，该公司认为这种销售并不构成传统投资，而是代表即时交易，不涉及出于长期投资目的而持有 XRP。

Ripple's Motion to Strike, filed on April 22, specifically targets the SEC's inclusion of testimony from Andrea Fox, an expert witness whose identity and testimony were not disclosed during the discovery phase. Ripple contends that this omission violates the rules of procedure and undermines the fairness of the proceedings.

Ripple 于 4 月 22 日提交的罢工动议，专门针对 SEC 纳入专家证人 A​​ndrea Fox 的证词，其身份和证词在发现阶段并未披露。 Ripple 认为，这种遗漏违反了程序规则，并破坏了程序的公平性。

In response to the motion, Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn has issued a scheduling order that extends the deadline for the SEC to file its rebuttal to April 29, 2024. Ripple will then have three business days to issue its response.

作为对该动议的回应，治安法官 Sarah Netburn 发布了一项调度命令，将 SEC 提出反驳的截止日期延长至 2024 年 4 月 29 日。Ripple 将有 3 个工作日的时间发布回应。

Beyond the expert submission challenge, Ripple has also contested the extensive remedies proposed by the SEC, including broad injunctive relief, significant disgorgement of profits, and substantial civil penalties. Ripple argues that the factual basis of the case does not warrant such disproportionate sanctions.

除了专家提交的挑战之外，Ripple 还对 SEC 提出的广泛补救措施提出异议，包括广泛的禁令救济、大量利润返还和巨额民事处罚。瑞波认为，该案的事实依据并不值得采取如此不成比例的制裁。

Furthermore, Ripple has emphasized its efforts to adjust its operations to ensure compliance with legal standards, thereby mitigating the likelihood of future violations. This corrective action, the company contends, should be taken into account by the court in its determination of appropriate remedies.

此外，Ripple 还强调其努力调整其运营，以确保遵守法律标准，从而减少未来违规的可能性。该公司认为，法院在决定适当的补救措施时应考虑这一纠正措施。

ConsenSys Lawsuit against SEC: Ethereum's Status in the Spotlight

ConsenSys 针对 SEC 的诉讼：以太坊的地位备受关注

In a parallel development that could have significant implications for the Ripple case, Ethereum developer ConsenSys has filed its own lawsuit against the SEC, challenging the regulator's authority over Ethereum and associated services like MetaMask.

在可能对 Ripple 案件产生重大影响的并行发展中，以太坊开发商 ConsenSys 已对 SEC 提起诉讼，挑战监管机构对以太坊和 MetaMask 等相关服务的权威。

ConsenSys's lawsuit seeks a declaration that ETH, the native cryptocurrency of the Ethereum blockchain, is not a security. This move counters the SEC's recent actions that suggest an expansion of its regulatory reach over cryptocurrencies. ConsenSys argues that the SEC's stance is inconsistent with past statements that considered ETH a commodity.

ConsenSys 的诉讼寻求声明以太坊区块链的原生加密货币 ETH 不是证券。此举与美国证券交易委员会最近的行动相悖，该行动表明其扩大了对加密货币的监管范围。 ConsenSys 认为 SEC 的立场与过去将 ETH 视为商品的声明不一致。

Implications for Ripple and the Cryptocurrency Industry

对瑞波币和加密货币行业的影响

The ConsenSys lawsuit has the potential to influence the Ripple case and the broader cryptocurrency market. If ConsenSys successfully argues that ETH is not a security, it could set a legal precedent that could benefit Ripple by fostering a more favorable regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies.

ConsenSys 诉讼有可能影响 Ripple 案和更广泛的加密货币市场。如果 ConsenSys 成功证明 ETH 不是证券，它可能会开创一个法律先例，通过为加密货币营造一个更有利的监管环境，从而使 Ripple 受益。

Such an outcome could deter the SEC from asserting broad regulatory authority, potentially influencing its ongoing case against Ripple. This, in turn, could have a significant impact on the cryptocurrency industry as a whole.

这样的结果可能会阻止美国证券交易委员会行使广泛的监管权力，从而可能影响其针对瑞波币正在进行的案件。反过来，这可能会对整个加密货币行业产生重大影响。

The Ripple and ConsenSys lawsuits are pivotal moments in the ongoing debate over the classification and regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States. The outcomes of these cases will determine whether the SEC's regulatory stance will be reinforced or whether digital assets will be subject to a reevaluation of their regulatory status.

Ripple 和 ConsenSys 诉讼是美国加密货币分类和监管持续争论的关键时刻。这些案件的结果将决定美国证券交易委员会的监管立场是否会得到加强，或者数字资产的监管地位是否会受到重新评估。