Ripple 在 SEC 訴訟中反擊，挑戰補救措施和專家證據

法官 Sarah Netburn 已為 Ripple 駁回 SEC 在正在進行的訴訟中提出的專家意見的動議制定了時間表。 SEC 已獲準將期限延長至 2024 年 4 月 29 日，以便對 Ripple 的動議提出反駁。 Ripple 在其動議中聲稱 ODL 銷售不符合投資特徵，並已調整其營運以避免未來違規。與此同時，以太坊開發商 ConsenSys 已對 SEC 提起訴訟，質疑後者對以太坊的權威，這可能會影響 Ripple 案和更廣泛的加密市場。

Ripple vs. SEC Lawsuit Update: Ripple Challenges SEC's Remedies and Expert Submissions

Ripple 與 SEC 訴訟更新：Ripple 挑戰 SEC 的補救措施和專家意見

In a highly anticipated development, Ripple has filed a motion to dismiss the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) latest expert submissions in their ongoing lawsuit. The crux of Ripple's argument lies in the nature of its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) sales, which the company maintains do not constitute traditional investments but rather represent instantaneous transactions that do not involve holding XRP for long-term investment purposes.

在備受期待的事態發展中，Ripple 已提出動議，駁回美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 在正在進行的訴訟中最新的專家意見。 Ripple 論點的關鍵在於其按需流動性（ODL）銷售的性質，該公司認為這種銷售並不構成傳統投資，而是代表即時交易，不涉及出於長期投資目的而持有 XRP。

Ripple's Motion to Strike, filed on April 22, specifically targets the SEC's inclusion of testimony from Andrea Fox, an expert witness whose identity and testimony were not disclosed during the discovery phase. Ripple contends that this omission violates the rules of procedure and undermines the fairness of the proceedings.

Ripple 於 4 月 22 日提交的罷工動議，專門針對 SEC 納入專家證人 Andrea Fox 的證詞，其身分和證詞在發現階段並未披露。 Ripple 認為，這種遺漏違反了程序規則，並破壞了程序的公平性。

In response to the motion, Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn has issued a scheduling order that extends the deadline for the SEC to file its rebuttal to April 29, 2024. Ripple will then have three business days to issue its response.

作為對該動議的回應，治安法官 Sarah Netburn 發布了一項調度命令，將 SEC 提出反駁的截止日期延長至 2024 年 4 月 29 日。

Beyond the expert submission challenge, Ripple has also contested the extensive remedies proposed by the SEC, including broad injunctive relief, significant disgorgement of profits, and substantial civil penalties. Ripple argues that the factual basis of the case does not warrant such disproportionate sanctions.

除了專家提交的挑戰之外，Ripple 還對 SEC 提出的廣泛補救措施提出異議，包括廣泛的禁令救濟、大量利潤返還和巨額民事處罰。瑞波認為，該案的事實依據並不值得採取如此不成比例的製裁。

Furthermore, Ripple has emphasized its efforts to adjust its operations to ensure compliance with legal standards, thereby mitigating the likelihood of future violations. This corrective action, the company contends, should be taken into account by the court in its determination of appropriate remedies.

此外，Ripple 還強調其努力調整其運營，以確保遵守法律標準，從而減少未來違規的可能性。該公司認為，法院在決定適當的補救措施時應考慮此糾正措施。

ConsenSys Lawsuit against SEC: Ethereum's Status in the Spotlight

ConsenSys 針對 SEC 的訴訟：以太坊的地位備受關注

In a parallel development that could have significant implications for the Ripple case, Ethereum developer ConsenSys has filed its own lawsuit against the SEC, challenging the regulator's authority over Ethereum and associated services like MetaMask.

在可能對 Ripple 案件產生重大影響的平行發展中，以太坊開發商 ConsenSys 已對 SEC 提起訴訟，挑戰監​​管機構對以太坊和 MetaMask 等相關服務的權威。

ConsenSys's lawsuit seeks a declaration that ETH, the native cryptocurrency of the Ethereum blockchain, is not a security. This move counters the SEC's recent actions that suggest an expansion of its regulatory reach over cryptocurrencies. ConsenSys argues that the SEC's stance is inconsistent with past statements that considered ETH a commodity.

ConsenSys 的訴訟尋求聲明以太坊區塊鏈的原生加密貨幣 ETH 不是證券。此舉與美國證券交易委員會最近的行動相悖，該行動表明其擴大了對加密貨幣的監管範圍。 ConsenSys 認為 SEC 的立場與過去將 ETH 視為商品的聲明不一致。

Implications for Ripple and the Cryptocurrency Industry

對瑞波幣和加密貨幣產業的影響

The ConsenSys lawsuit has the potential to influence the Ripple case and the broader cryptocurrency market. If ConsenSys successfully argues that ETH is not a security, it could set a legal precedent that could benefit Ripple by fostering a more favorable regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies.

ConsenSys 訴訟有可能影響 Ripple 案和更廣泛的加密貨幣市場。如果 ConsenSys 成功證明 ETH 不是證券，它可能會開創一個法律先例，透過為加密貨幣創造一個更有利的監管環境，從而使 Ripple 受益。

Such an outcome could deter the SEC from asserting broad regulatory authority, potentially influencing its ongoing case against Ripple. This, in turn, could have a significant impact on the cryptocurrency industry as a whole.

這樣的結果可能會阻止美國證券交易委員會行使廣泛的監管權力，這可能會影響其針對瑞波幣正在進行的案件。反過來，這可能會對整個加密貨幣產業產生重大影響。

The Ripple and ConsenSys lawsuits are pivotal moments in the ongoing debate over the classification and regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States. The outcomes of these cases will determine whether the SEC's regulatory stance will be reinforced or whether digital assets will be subject to a reevaluation of their regulatory status.

Ripple 和 ConsenSys 訴訟是美國加密貨幣分類和監管持續爭論的關鍵時刻。這些案件的結果將決定美國證券交易委員會的監管立場是否會加強，或者數位資產的監管地位是否會受到重新評估。