预售的区别可能影响了SEC避免对以太坊采取行动的决定（ETH）

加密货币社区中著名人物BankXRP（@bankxrp）最近引起了人们对XRP分类的持续辩论

A well-known figure in the cryptocurrency community, BankXRP (@BankXRP), recently brought attention to the ongoing debate over XRP’s classification in the SEC’s case against Ripple. The discussion centers around whether XRP should be categorized as a commodity, similar to Ethereum (ETH), or if it falls under securities regulations.

加密货币社区的一个著名人物BankXRP（@bankxrp）最近引起了人们对SEC对Ripple案中XRP分类的持续辩论。讨论围绕XRP是否应归类为商品，类似于以太坊（ETH），还是根据证券法规属于商品。

The SEC’s past decision not to take action against Ethereum despite its initial coin offering (ICO) has raised questions about inconsistent enforcement.

SEC过去决定不对以太坊采取最初的硬币（ICO）的决定提出了有关执法不一致的问题。

Responding to these comparisons, Ripple's Chief Technology Officer (CTO), David Schwartz, highlighted a key difference: ETH was privately sold by an issuer before any ledger or blockchain existed, while XRP did not have any pre-sale.

在回应这些比较时，Ripple的首席技术官（CTO）David Schwartz强调了一个关键区别：ETH在存在任何分类帐或区块链之前由发行人私下出售，而XRP没有任何预售。

Schwartz's remarks were made in response to Fox Business Senior Correspondent Charles Gasparino, who discussed the ongoing settlement negotiations between Ripple and the SEC.

施瓦茨（Schwartz）的言论是为了回应福克斯（Fox）业务高级记者查尔斯·加斯帕里诺（Charles Gasparino），他讨论了Ripple和SEC之间正在进行的和解谈判。

Gasparino pointed out that the SEC is considering whether XRP's utility and trading characteristics now align more closely with those of a commodity. He also emphasized the significance of Ethereum's (ETH) regulatory treatment, stating that ETH was initially issued through an initial coin offering (ICO) but later recognized as a commodity. Gasparino questioned why XRP was singled out for legal action while ETH was not.

加斯帕里诺（Gasparino）指出，SEC正在考虑XRP的效用和交易特征现在是否与商品的效用和交易特征更紧密地保持一致。他还强调了以太坊（ETH）监管治疗的重要性，并指出ETH最初是通过初始硬币发行（ICO）发行的，但后来被公认为是商品。加斯帕里诺（Gasparino）质疑为什么XRP被选出法律行动，而ETH则没有采取行动。

David Schwartz's clarification ties into ongoing SEC-Ripple settlement talks, where XRP's classification as a commodity or security is debated, pic.twitter.com/pkBSa7F7rl

大卫·施瓦茨（David Schwartz）的澄清与正在进行的SEC-ripple和解谈判有关，XRP的分类为商品或安全性，pic.twitter.com/pkbsa7f7rl

— 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸XRP (@BankXRP) March 13, 2025

- 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸XRP（@bankxrp）2025年3月13日

In response, David Schwartz challenged the comparison between ETH and XRP, stating, "ETH was privately sold by an issuer prior to any ledger or blockchain existing. XRP was not." His argument reinforces the view that ETH had a pre-sale before its blockchain was operational, whereas XRP did not undergo a similar process.

作为回应，戴维·施瓦茨（David Schwartz）对ETH和XRP的比较提出了质疑，并指出：“ ETH在现有的任何分类帐或区块链之前由发行人私下出售。XRP不是。”他的论点加强了这样一种观点，即ETH在区块链​​运行之前进行了预售，而XRP没有经历类似的过程。

This distinction is crucial because the SEC's case against Ripple has largely relied on the claim that XRP's issuance was akin to an unregistered securities offering. However, Schwartz's statement highlights a fundamental difference in how the two assets were initially distributed.

这种区别至关重要，因为SEC针对Ripple的案件在很大程度上依赖于XRP发行类似于未注册的证券提供的说法。但是，施瓦茨的声明强调了两种资产最初分配方式的根本差异。

We are on twitter, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

我们在Twitter上，关注我们与我们联系： - @timestabloid1

Members of the XRP community have been calling out the SEC since the beginning of the lawsuit, as the regulator did not take any legal action against Ethereum despite its pre-sale, whereas Ripple has faced years of litigation.

自诉讼开始以来，XRP社区的成员就一直在召集SEC，因为尽管监管机构的预售前销售没有采取任何针对以太坊的法律诉讼，而Ripple面临多年的诉讼。

The SEC's inconsistent treatment of XRP and ETH underscores regulatory bias and selective enforcement. However, with former SEC Chair Gary Gensler out of the picture and his war on crypto winding down, many in the XRP army are eager to put the past behind them and focus on a future with sensible crypto regulation.

SEC对XRP和ETH的不一致治疗强调了监管偏见和选择性执行。但是，随着前SEC主席Gary Gensler离开了图片，他对加密货币的战争结束了，XRP军队中的许多人都渴望将过去放在身后，并专注于明智的加密法规。

Recent reports suggest that Ripple is negotiating for the removal of the permanent injunction preventing institutional sales. The end of the lawsuit would quell all questions about XRP's status and create a level playing field.

最近的报告表明，Ripple正在谈判删除预防机构销售的永久禁令。诉讼的结束将平息有关XRP状态的所有问题，并创建一个公平的竞争环境。

This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

该内容旨在告知，不应被视为财务建议。本文中表达的观点可能包括作者的个人意见，并且不代表小报的观点。在做出任何投资决策之前，敦促读者进行深入研究。读者采取的任何行动都严格符合他们自身的风险。时代小报对任何财务损失概不负责。

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News

在X，Facebook，Telegram和Google新闻上关注我们