預售的區別可能影響了SEC避免對以太坊採取行動的決定（ETH）

加密貨幣社區中著名人物BankXRP（@bankxrp）最近引起了人們對XRP分類的持續辯論

A well-known figure in the cryptocurrency community, BankXRP (@BankXRP), recently brought attention to the ongoing debate over XRP’s classification in the SEC’s case against Ripple. The discussion centers around whether XRP should be categorized as a commodity, similar to Ethereum (ETH), or if it falls under securities regulations.

加密貨幣社區的一個著名人物BankXRP（@bankxrp）最近引起了人們對SEC對Ripple案中XRP分類的持續辯論。討論圍繞XRP是否應歸類為商品，類似於以太坊（ETH），還是根據證券法規屬於商品。

The SEC’s past decision not to take action against Ethereum despite its initial coin offering (ICO) has raised questions about inconsistent enforcement.

SEC過去決定不對以太坊採取最初的硬幣（ICO）的決定提出了有關執法不一致的問題。

Responding to these comparisons, Ripple's Chief Technology Officer (CTO), David Schwartz, highlighted a key difference: ETH was privately sold by an issuer before any ledger or blockchain existed, while XRP did not have any pre-sale.

在回應這些比較時，Ripple的首席技術官（CTO）David Schwartz強調了一個關鍵區別：ETH在存在任何分類帳或區塊鏈之前由發行人私下出售，而XRP沒有任何預售。

Schwartz's remarks were made in response to Fox Business Senior Correspondent Charles Gasparino, who discussed the ongoing settlement negotiations between Ripple and the SEC.

施瓦茨（Schwartz）的言論是為了回應福克斯（Fox）業務高級記者查爾斯·加斯帕里諾（Charles Gasparino），他討論了Ripple和SEC之間正在進行的和解談判。

Gasparino pointed out that the SEC is considering whether XRP's utility and trading characteristics now align more closely with those of a commodity. He also emphasized the significance of Ethereum's (ETH) regulatory treatment, stating that ETH was initially issued through an initial coin offering (ICO) but later recognized as a commodity. Gasparino questioned why XRP was singled out for legal action while ETH was not.

加斯帕里諾（Gasparino）指出，SEC正在考慮XRP的效用和交易特徵現在是否與商品的效用和交易特徵更緊密地保持一致。他還強調了以太坊（ETH）監管治療的重要性，並指出ETH最初是通過初始硬幣發行（ICO）發行的，但後來被公認為是商品。加斯帕里諾（Gasparino）質疑為什麼XRP被選出法律行動，而ETH則沒有採取行動。

David Schwartz's clarification ties into ongoing SEC-Ripple settlement talks, where XRP's classification as a commodity or security is debated, pic.twitter.com/pkBSa7F7rl

大衛·施瓦茨（David Schwartz）的澄清與正在進行的SEC-ripple和解談判有關，XRP的分類為商品或安全性，pic.twitter.com/pkbsa7f7rl

— 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸XRP (@BankXRP) March 13, 2025

- 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸XRP（@bankxrp）2025年3月13日

In response, David Schwartz challenged the comparison between ETH and XRP, stating, "ETH was privately sold by an issuer prior to any ledger or blockchain existing. XRP was not." His argument reinforces the view that ETH had a pre-sale before its blockchain was operational, whereas XRP did not undergo a similar process.

作為回應，戴維·施瓦茨（David Schwartz）對ETH和XRP的比較提出了質疑，並指出：“ ETH在現有的任何分類帳或區塊鏈之前由發行人私下出售。XRP不是。”他的論點加強了這樣一種觀點，即ETH在區塊鏈​​運行之前進行了預售，而XRP沒有經歷類似的過程。

This distinction is crucial because the SEC's case against Ripple has largely relied on the claim that XRP's issuance was akin to an unregistered securities offering. However, Schwartz's statement highlights a fundamental difference in how the two assets were initially distributed.

這種區別至關重要，因為SEC針對Ripple的案件在很大程度上依賴於XRP發行類似於未註冊的證券提供的說法。但是，施瓦茨的聲明強調了兩種資產最初分配方式的根本差異。

We are on twitter, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1

我們在Twitter上，關注我們與我們聯繫： - @timestabloid1

Members of the XRP community have been calling out the SEC since the beginning of the lawsuit, as the regulator did not take any legal action against Ethereum despite its pre-sale, whereas Ripple has faced years of litigation.

自訴訟開始以來，XRP社區的成員就一直在召集SEC，因為儘管監管機構的預售前銷售沒有採取任何針對以太坊的法律訴訟，而Ripple面臨多年的訴訟。

The SEC's inconsistent treatment of XRP and ETH underscores regulatory bias and selective enforcement. However, with former SEC Chair Gary Gensler out of the picture and his war on crypto winding down, many in the XRP army are eager to put the past behind them and focus on a future with sensible crypto regulation.

SEC對XRP和ETH的不一致治療強調了監管偏見和選擇性執行。但是，隨著前SEC主席Gary Gensler離開了圖片，他對加密貨幣的戰爭結束了，XRP軍隊中的許多人都渴望將過去放在身後，並專注於明智的加密法規。

Recent reports suggest that Ripple is negotiating for the removal of the permanent injunction preventing institutional sales. The end of the lawsuit would quell all questions about XRP's status and create a level playing field.

最近的報告表明，Ripple正在談判刪除預防機構銷售的永久禁令。訴訟的結束將平息有關XRP狀態的所有問題，並創建一個公平的競爭環境。

This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

該內容旨在告知，不應被視為財務建議。本文中表達的觀點可能包括作者的個人意見，並且不代表小報的觀點。在做出任何投資決策之前，敦促讀者進行深入研究。讀者採取的任何行動都嚴格符合他們自身的風險。時代小報對任何財務損失概不負責。

Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News

在X，Facebook，Telegram和Google新聞上關注我們