MicroStrategy首席执行官Michael Saylor概述了有争议的计划，以破坏他的比特币

塞勒（Saylor）将他的比特币私钥的死后破坏是一个道德的财务决定，这将增加比特币对现有用户的稀缺性。迈克尔·莫克罗斯（Michael Majoros）。 2023年4月18日更新。

Executive Chairman of MicroStrategy, Michael Saylor, known for his extensive support for Bitcoin assets, has unveiled a controversial proposal for managing his own Bitcoin wealth. Saylor's suggestion to posthumously destroy his Bitcoin private keys to restrict access to his fortune is seen as an ethical financial decision that would increase Bitcoin's scarcity for remaining users.

Microstrategy的执行董事长Michael Saylor以其对比特币资产的广泛支持而闻名，他宣布了一项有争议的建议，以管理自己的比特币财富。塞勒（Saylor）的建议是死后摧毁他的比特币私人钥匙以限制获得他的财富的私人钥匙，这被视为道德财务决定，这将增加比特币对剩余用户的稀缺性。

During a recent interview, Saylor shared his vision of Bitcoin evolving into a lasting economic power for the future. As part of his "economic immortality" concept, Saylor proposed limiting the use of his Bitcoin wealth, which would decrease its supply and potentially raise Bitcoin's value. He compared his strategy to the unspent Bitcoin owned by Satoshi Nakamoto.

在最近的一次采访中，Saylor分享了他对比特币发展成为未来经济能力的愿景。作为他“经济不朽”概念的一部分，塞勒提议限制其比特币财富的使用，这将降低其供应并可能提高比特币的价值。他将自己的策略与纳卡本萨西（Satoshi Nakamoto）拥有的未固定比特币进行了比较。

In an effort to align with the legacy of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, who holds one million Bitcoins in a permanent unspent wallet, Saylor has hinted that he may one day render his Bitcoin holdings permanently inaccessible. However, the interviewer pointed out the potential difficulties in fully transferring such an initiative.

为了与比特币创作者萨托·纳卡本（Satoshi Nakamoto）的遗产保持一致，后者在永久性的不起头钱的钱包中持有一百万个比特币，Saylor暗示他可能有一天可以永久地使他的比特币持有量永久性地变得难以置信。但是，面试官指出了完全转移这样的倡议的潜在困难。

Saylor's Bitcoin proposal has sparked heated debate among crypto enthusiasts, discussing the pros and cons of reducing Bitcoin's active supply. Such reductions can potentially increase Bitcoin's value due to scarcity, benefiting remaining holders. However, opponents argue that the creation of financial instability and damage to the inclusive goals of cryptocurrency adoption.

Saylor的比特币提案引发了加密爱好者之间的激烈辩论，讨论了减少比特币积极供应的利弊。由于稀缺性，这种减少可能会增加比特币的价值，从而使剩余的持有人受益。但是，反对者认为，产生金融不稳定和对采用加密货币的包容性目标的损害。

The purposeful elimination of circulating assets raises questions about their ethical effects and how they influence future decisions by large asset holders. As Bitcoin's price continues to fluctuate, the focus shifts to the integration of cryptocurrency in broader financial and legal frameworks.

有目的的消除循环资产提出了有关其道德影响以及它们如何影响大型资产持有人未来决策的问题。随着比特币的价格继续波动，重点转移到了更广泛的财务和法律框架中加密货币的整合。