MicroStrategy首席執行官Michael Saylor概述了有爭議的計劃，以破壞他的比特幣

塞勒（Saylor）將他的比特幣私鑰的死後破壞是一個道德的財務決定，這將增加比特幣對現有用戶的稀缺性。邁克爾·莫克羅斯（Michael Majoros）。 2023年4月18日更新。

Executive Chairman of MicroStrategy, Michael Saylor, known for his extensive support for Bitcoin assets, has unveiled a controversial proposal for managing his own Bitcoin wealth. Saylor's suggestion to posthumously destroy his Bitcoin private keys to restrict access to his fortune is seen as an ethical financial decision that would increase Bitcoin's scarcity for remaining users.

Microstrategy的執行董事長Michael Saylor以其對比特幣資產的廣泛支持而聞名，他宣布了一項有爭議的建議，以管理自己的比特幣財富。塞勒（Saylor）的建議是死後摧毀他的比特幣私人鑰匙以限制獲得他的財富的私人鑰匙，這被視為道德財務決定，這將增加比特幣對剩餘用戶的稀缺性。

During a recent interview, Saylor shared his vision of Bitcoin evolving into a lasting economic power for the future. As part of his "economic immortality" concept, Saylor proposed limiting the use of his Bitcoin wealth, which would decrease its supply and potentially raise Bitcoin's value. He compared his strategy to the unspent Bitcoin owned by Satoshi Nakamoto.

在最近的一次採訪中，Saylor分享了他對比特幣發展成為未來經濟能力的願景。作為他“經濟不朽”概念的一部分，塞勒提議限制其比特幣財富的使用，這將降低其供應並可能提高比特幣的價值。他將自己的策略與納卡本薩西（Satoshi Nakamoto）擁有的未固定比特幣進行了比較。

In an effort to align with the legacy of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, who holds one million Bitcoins in a permanent unspent wallet, Saylor has hinted that he may one day render his Bitcoin holdings permanently inaccessible. However, the interviewer pointed out the potential difficulties in fully transferring such an initiative.

為了與比特幣創作者薩托·納卡本（Satoshi Nakamoto）的遺產保持一致，後者在永久性的不起頭錢的錢包中持有一百萬個比特幣，Saylor暗示他可能有一天可以永久地使他的比特幣持有量永久性地變得難以置信。但是，面試官指出了完全轉移這樣的倡議的潛在困難。

Saylor's Bitcoin proposal has sparked heated debate among crypto enthusiasts, discussing the pros and cons of reducing Bitcoin's active supply. Such reductions can potentially increase Bitcoin's value due to scarcity, benefiting remaining holders. However, opponents argue that the creation of financial instability and damage to the inclusive goals of cryptocurrency adoption.

Saylor的比特幣提案引發了加密愛好者之間的激烈辯論，討論了減少比特幣積極供應的利弊。由於稀缺性，這種減少可能會增加比特幣的價值，從而使剩餘的持有人受益。但是，反對者認為，產生金融不穩定和對採用加密貨幣的包容性目標的損害。

The purposeful elimination of circulating assets raises questions about their ethical effects and how they influence future decisions by large asset holders. As Bitcoin's price continues to fluctuate, the focus shifts to the integration of cryptocurrency in broader financial and legal frameworks.

有目的的消除循環資產提出了有關其道德影響以及它們如何影響大型資產持有人未來決策的問題。隨著比特幣的價格繼續波動，重點轉移到了更廣泛的財務和法律框架中加密貨幣的整合。