整个加密社区都从Crypto.com的有争议的决定重新磨合700亿克罗

该行动本质上是在2021年执行的代币燃烧的撤消，目的是对代币的供应产生永久影响

The entire crypto community is currently discussing the controversial decision by Crypto.com to re-mint 70 billion CRO. This action, which is essentially an undoing of a token burn that was executed in 2021 with the goal of creating a permanent impact on the token’s supply, has drawn significant criticism and claims of trust being broken, and fueled the ongoing conversation about centralization vs decentralization in the crypto space.

整个加密货币社区目前都在讨论Crypto.com对重新磨合700亿克罗的有争议的决定。这项行动实质上是对2021年执行的代币燃烧的一种撤消，目的是对代币的供应产生永久影响，它引起了重大批评和信任的主张，并促进了有关集中化与加密货币空间中的集中化的交谈。

At the heart of the controversy is Crypto.com’s plan to reverse a major token burn that took place in 2021. Initially, this burn effectively took 70 billion CRO out of circulation and was seen as a step in a good direction, as it should help stabilize the value of the token and reward long-hold types.

争议的核心是Crypto.com计划扭转2021年发生的重大令牌燃烧的计划。最初，这种燃烧有效地使700亿克罗（Croco）从流通中脱颖而出，并被视为朝着良好的方向迈出的一步，因为它应该有助于稳定代币的价值并奖励长期类型。

According to the justification for their re-minting, the new tokens will be utilized as a strategic reserve for the Cronos blockchain and allocated for investments in Cronos projects — and even potentially a CRO-backed Exchange Traded Fund (ETF). However, the methods to realize these goals have caused considerable division in the community. Many in the community argue that token burns are meant to be irreversible and serve as a fundamental mechanism to reduce inflation and increase scarcity. Reversing such a decision, they claim, undermines investor confidence and raises concerns about Crypto.com’s long-term commitment to its tokenomics strategy.

根据他们重新启动的理由，新的代币将被用作Cronos区块链的战略储备，并分配用于Cronos项目的投资，甚至可能是CRO支持的交易所交易基金（ETF）。但是，实现这些目标的方法在社区中引起了相当大的分歧。社区中的许多人认为，令牌燃烧的目的是不可逆转，并且是减少通货膨胀和增加稀缺性的基本机制。他们声称，扭转这样的决定破坏了投资者的信心，并引起了人们对Crypto.com对其令牌策略的长期承诺的担忧。

The voting process itself has come under scrutiny. Enactment of the proposal, which ranged from March 2nd to March 16th, struggled to gain traction for a large part of its time period. Support dipped precariously above opposition, but the critical quorum of 33.4% required for the proposal to pass remained just out of reach.

投票过程本身受到了审查。该提案的制定范围从3月2日至3月16日不等，在很大一部分时间内努力获得吸引力。支持率不稳定，但提议通过的提案需要33.4％的关键法定人数仍然遥不可及。

Then, in the final hours, everything changed. An unprecedented volume of 3.35 billion CRO tokens rushing into the “yes” pool caused the proposal to cross the line and was followed by a tidal wave of anger and disbelief among the community. A total of 61.18% voted for, 17.61% voted against, 20.11% abstained, and 0.11% vetoed. The turnout for the vote is 70.18%, far beyond the required minimum.

然后，在最后几个小时里，一切都改变了。前所未有的33.5亿个CRO代币冲入“是”池的数量导致该提议越界，随后是社区中的愤怒和难以置信的潮汐。总共61.18％投票赞成，有17.61％的投票支持，弃权20.11％，否决了0.11％。投票的投票率为70.18％，远远超出了所需的最低要求。

The late flood of votes has been largely blamed on validators owned by Crypto.com. These validators, including Starship, Falcon Heavy, Electron, Antares, and Minotaur IV, collectively control a large majority (70-80%) of the total voting power within the Cronos network. This power center enabled Crypto.com to qualify as a validator in order to bypass smaller validators’ baskets with respect to token holders.

晚期投票的洪水主要归咎于Crypto.com拥有的验证者。这些验证者，包括星际飞船，猎鹰重，电子，安塔雷斯和牛头怪IV，共同控制了Cronos网络中总投票能力的绝大多数（70-80％）。该电源中心使Crypto.com有资格成为验证器，以绕过相对于令牌持有人的较小验证者的篮子。

Critics argue that the sudden influx of votes from Crypto.com-controlled validators not only skewed the outcome but also set a dangerous precedent for future governance decisions. Some community members described the move as “governance theater,” arguing that decentralization exists in name only. If a single entity can single-handedly tip the balance in its favor, many fear that decentralized decision-making could become an illusion rather than a reality.

批评者认为，来自Crypto.com控制的验证者的突然涌入不仅使结果偏向，而且为未来的治理决定树立了危险的先例。一些社区成员将这一举动描述为“治理剧院”，认为权力仅以名义存在。如果一个实体能够单枪匹马地平衡自己，那么许多人担心分散的决策会成为一种幻想，而不是现实。

Final voting tally. Source: Mintscan

最终投票统计。资料来源：mintscan

The incident, however, goes deeper than just its immediate financial consequences, as it leaves behind questions regarding the long-term sustainability of governance models in blockchain-based projects. Such overwhelming control by a single entity over the voting process undermines decentralization and allows the wealthiest groups to dictate the network’s future development.

然而，该事件的进展不仅仅是其直接的财务后果，因为它留下了有关基于区块链项目中治理模型的长期可持续性的问题。一个实体对投票过程的压倒性控制破坏了权力下放，并使最富有的群体决定网络的未来发展。

More News: Crypto.com Sets Ambitious Course: Cronos ETF and Stablecoin Launch in 2025

更多新闻：Crypto.com设置了雄心勃勃的课程：Cronos ETF和Stablecoin于2025年推出