整個加密社區都從Crypto.com的有爭議的決定重新磨合700億克羅

該動作本質上是對2021年執行的代幣燃燒的一種撤消，目的是對代幣的供應產生永久影響

The entire crypto community is currently discussing the controversial decision by Crypto.com to re-mint 70 billion CRO. This action, which is essentially an undoing of a token burn that was executed in 2021 with the goal of creating a permanent impact on the token’s supply, has drawn significant criticism and claims of trust being broken, and fueled the ongoing conversation about centralization vs decentralization in the crypto space.

整個加密貨幣社區目前都在討論Crypto.com對重新磨合700億克羅的有爭議的決定。這項行動實質上是對2021年執行的代幣燃燒的一種撤消，目的是對代幣的供應產生永久影響，它引起了重大批評和信任的主張，並促進了有關集中化與加密貨幣空間中的集中化的交談。

At the heart of the controversy is Crypto.com’s plan to reverse a major token burn that took place in 2021. Initially, this burn effectively took 70 billion CRO out of circulation and was seen as a step in a good direction, as it should help stabilize the value of the token and reward long-hold types.

爭議的核心是Crypto.com計劃扭轉2021年發生的重大令牌燃燒的計劃。最初，這種燃燒有效地使700億克羅（Croco）從流通中脫穎而出，並被視為朝著良好的方向邁出的一步，因為它應該有助於穩定代幣的價值並獎勵長期類型。

According to the justification for their re-minting, the new tokens will be utilized as a strategic reserve for the Cronos blockchain and allocated for investments in Cronos projects — and even potentially a CRO-backed Exchange Traded Fund (ETF). However, the methods to realize these goals have caused considerable division in the community. Many in the community argue that token burns are meant to be irreversible and serve as a fundamental mechanism to reduce inflation and increase scarcity. Reversing such a decision, they claim, undermines investor confidence and raises concerns about Crypto.com’s long-term commitment to its tokenomics strategy.

根據他們重新啟動的理由，新的代幣將被用作Cronos區塊鏈的戰略儲備，並分配用於Cronos項目的投資，甚至可能是CRO支持的交易所交易基金（ETF）。但是，實現這些目標的方法在社區中引起了相當大的分歧。社區中的許多人認為，令牌燃燒的目的是不可逆轉，並且是減少通貨膨脹和增加稀缺性的基本機制。他們聲稱，扭轉這樣的決定破壞了投資者的信心，並引起了人們對Crypto.com對其令牌策略的長期承諾的擔憂。

The voting process itself has come under scrutiny. Enactment of the proposal, which ranged from March 2nd to March 16th, struggled to gain traction for a large part of its time period. Support dipped precariously above opposition, but the critical quorum of 33.4% required for the proposal to pass remained just out of reach.

投票過程本身受到了審查。該提案的製定範圍從3月2日至3月16日不等，在很大一部分時間內努力獲得吸引力。支持率不穩定，但提議通過的提案需要33.4％的關鍵法定人數仍然遙不可及。

Then, in the final hours, everything changed. An unprecedented volume of 3.35 billion CRO tokens rushing into the “yes” pool caused the proposal to cross the line and was followed by a tidal wave of anger and disbelief among the community. A total of 61.18% voted for, 17.61% voted against, 20.11% abstained, and 0.11% vetoed. The turnout for the vote is 70.18%, far beyond the required minimum.

然後，在最後幾個小時裡，一切都改變了。前所未有的33.5億個CRO代幣衝入“是”池的數量使該提議越過了界限，隨後是社區中的憤怒和難以置信的潮汐。總共61.18％投票贊成，有17.61％的投票支持，棄權20.11％，否決了0.11％。投票的投票率為70.18％，遠遠超出了所需的最低要求。

The late flood of votes has been largely blamed on validators owned by Crypto.com. These validators, including Starship, Falcon Heavy, Electron, Antares, and Minotaur IV, collectively control a large majority (70-80%) of the total voting power within the Cronos network. This power center enabled Crypto.com to qualify as a validator in order to bypass smaller validators’ baskets with respect to token holders.

晚期投票的洪水主要歸咎於Crypto.com擁有的驗證者。這些驗證者，包括星際飛船，獵鷹重，電子，安塔雷斯和牛頭怪IV，共同控制了Cronos網絡中總投票能力的絕大多數（70-80％）。該電源中心使Crypto.com有資格成為驗證器，以繞過相對於令牌持有人的較小驗證者的籃子。

Critics argue that the sudden influx of votes from Crypto.com-controlled validators not only skewed the outcome but also set a dangerous precedent for future governance decisions. Some community members described the move as “governance theater,” arguing that decentralization exists in name only. If a single entity can single-handedly tip the balance in its favor, many fear that decentralized decision-making could become an illusion rather than a reality.

批評者認為，來自Crypto.com控制的驗證者的突然湧入不僅使結果偏向，而且為未來的治理決定樹立了危險的先例。一些社區成員將這一舉動描述為“治理劇院”，認為權力僅以名義存在。如果一個實體能夠單槍匹馬地平衡自己，那麼許多人擔心分散的決策會成為一種幻想，而不是現實。

Final voting tally. Source: Mintscan

最終投票統計。資料來源：mintscan

The incident, however, goes deeper than just its immediate financial consequences, as it leaves behind questions regarding the long-term sustainability of governance models in blockchain-based projects. Such overwhelming control by a single entity over the voting process undermines decentralization and allows the wealthiest groups to dictate the network’s future development.

然而，該事件的進展不僅僅是其直接的財務後果，因為它留下了有關基於區塊鏈項目中治理模型的長期可持續性的問題。一個實體對投票過程的壓倒性控制破壞了權力下放，並使最富有的群體決定網絡的未來發展。

More News: Crypto.com Sets Ambitious Course: Cronos ETF and Stablecoin Launch in 2025

更多新聞：Crypto.com設置了雄心勃勃的課程：Cronos ETF和Stablecoin於2025年推出