埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）的 Twitter 收费引发愤怒，Ripple 首席技术官称犯规

埃隆·马斯克 (Elon Musk) 决定向新用户收取 X（前身为 Twitter）上的帖子参与度的“小额费用”，这一决定引发了争议。 Ripple 首席技术官 David Schwartz 批评此举与马斯克关于言论自由的立场相矛盾，他认为基于合法言论的烦恼而压制合法言论并不是改变平台原则的正当理由。

Elon Musk's Twitter Fee Proposal Draws Criticism from Ripple CTO

埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）的 Twitter 收费提案招致 Ripple 首席技术官的批评

In a significant development that has sparked controversy within the technology and crypto communities, Elon Musk, the CEO of X (formerly Twitter), has announced plans to implement a "small fee" for new users before allowing them to engage in posting, liking, replying, or bookmarking posts on the platform. This move, Musk claims, is aimed at combating the proliferation of automated bots and spam accounts.

X（前 Twitter）首席执行官埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）宣布，计划对新用户收取“小额费用”，然后才允许他们发帖、点赞、在平台上回复或添加帖子书签。马斯克声称，此举旨在打击自动化机器人和垃圾邮件账户的扩散。

The news was initially reported by X Daily News, an account dedicated to covering the latest updates on Musk's social media venture. According to the leaked document, the new policy is already in effect for X users in New Zealand and the Philippines.

该消息最初由 X Daily News 报道，该账户致力于报道马斯克社交媒体事业的最新动态。根据泄露的文件，新政策已经对新西兰和菲律宾的 X 用户生效。

Musk himself confirmed the new policy in a tweet, stating that it was necessary to combat the relentless influx of bots. He pointed out that current AI and troll farms have advanced to the point where they can easily bypass "Are you a bot" tests, making it essential to implement a financial barrier for new user accounts.

马斯克本人在推文中证实了这项新政策，并表示有必要打击机器人的不断涌入。他指出，当前的人工智能和巨魔农场已经发展到可以轻松绕过“你是机器人”测试的程度，因此有必要为新用户帐户设置财务障碍。

Ripple CTO's Reaction

Ripple CTO 的反应

David Schwartz, the Chief Technology Officer of Ripple, expressed strong opposition to Musk's fee proposal, arguing that it contradicts the principle of free speech that Musk has repeatedly advocated for. In a tweet directed at Musk, Schwartz questioned the rationale behind restricting lawful speech on the platform simply because it may be annoying.

Ripple首席技术官大卫·施瓦茨(David Schwartz)对马斯克的收费提议表示强烈反对，认为这与马斯克一再倡导的言论自由原则相矛盾。在针对马斯克的推文中，施瓦茨质疑限制平台上合法言论的理由，仅仅是因为这可能令人讨厌。

"I thought you were against censoring any lawful speech on your platform," Schwartz tweeted. "Now, keeping some lawful speech off X just because it's annoying is so important that you're going to change the fundamental dynamics of the site to make it possible?!"

“我以为你反对审查你平台上的任何合法言论，”施瓦茨发推文说。 “现在，仅仅因为一些合法言论令人厌烦而将其禁止在 X 上是如此重要，以至于您要改变该网站的基本动态以使其成为可能？！”

In response to a user who argued that the fee was not intended to silence bots but rather an entire political spectrum, Schwartz countered that the distinction lies in the type of speech one agrees with versus the speech one does not. He emphasized the importance of not hiding behind a facade of free speech but rather openly admitting that the protection of speech is often limited to those with whom one agrees.

一位用户认为这笔费用不是为了压制机器人，而是为了压制整个政治领域，施瓦茨反驳说，区别在于人们同意的言论类型与不同意的言论类型。他强调不要躲在言论自由的表象后面，而要公开承认言论的保护往往仅限于那些同意的人。

Efficacy of Fee-Based Deterrence

收费威慑的功效

ZachXBT, a prominent crypto investigator, expressed skepticism regarding the effectiveness of the fee-based approach in deterring crypto spam. He pointed out the prevalence of "business-verified" scam crypto accounts for which scammers have paid thousands of dollars. According to ZachXBT, a small fee may not be sufficient to discourage bad actors from creating these accounts.

著名的加密货币调查员 ZachXBT 对基于收费的方法在阻止加密垃圾邮件方面的有效性表示怀疑。他指出，“经过商业验证”的骗局加密货币账户普遍存在，骗子为此支付了数千美元。据 ZachXBT 称，少量费用可能不足以阻止不良行为者创建这些账户。

Impact on Crypto Enthusiasts

对加密货币爱好者的影响

The proliferation of bots and spam accounts has been a persistent problem for crypto enthusiasts, especially the XRP Army. These accounts often promote fraudulent XRP giveaways and use images of Ripple executives to lend credibility to their schemes. Ripple has repeatedly issued warnings to its community about these scams.

机器人和垃圾邮件账户的激增一直是加密货币爱好者，尤其是 XRP 军团面临的一个持续存在的问题。这些帐户经常宣传欺诈性的 XRP 赠品，并使用 Ripple 高管的图像来为他们的计划提供可信度。 Ripple 已多次向其社区发出有关这些骗局的警告。

Conclusion

结论

The introduction of a fee for new X users has ignited a heated debate about the balance between free speech, spam prevention, and the effectiveness of financial barriers. While Musk claims that the fee is necessary to combat bots, critics argue that it could undermine the platform's commitment to open and uncensored communication. The long-term implications of this policy remain to be seen, but it is certain to continue shaping the ongoing discourse surrounding the future of social media and the role of technology in safeguarding free expression.

对新 X 用户收取费用的做法引发了一场关于言论自由、垃圾邮件预防和财务壁垒有效性之间平衡的激烈争论。尽管马斯克声称这笔费用对于打击机器人程序是必要的，但批评者认为，这可能会破坏该平台对开放和未经审查的通信的承诺。这项政策的长期影响仍有待观察，但它肯定会继续影响围绕社交媒体的未来以及技术在维护言论自由方面的作用的持续讨论。