馬斯克（Elon Musk）的 Twitter 收費引發憤怒，Ripple 首席技術官稱犯規

馬斯克 (Elon Musk) 決定向新用戶收取 X（前身為 Twitter）上的貼文參與度的“小額費用”，這一決定引發了爭議。 Ripple 技術長 David Schwartz 批評此舉與馬斯克關於言論自由的立場相矛盾，他認為基於合法言論的煩惱而壓制合法言論並不是改變平台原則的正當理由。

Elon Musk's Twitter Fee Proposal Draws Criticism from Ripple CTO

馬斯克（Elon Musk）的 Twitter 收費提案招致 Ripple 首席技術長的批評

In a significant development that has sparked controversy within the technology and crypto communities, Elon Musk, the CEO of X (formerly Twitter), has announced plans to implement a "small fee" for new users before allowing them to engage in posting, liking, replying, or bookmarking posts on the platform. This move, Musk claims, is aimed at combating the proliferation of automated bots and spam accounts.

X（前 Twitter）執行長馬斯克（Elon Musk）宣布，計劃對新用戶收取“小額費用”，然後才允許他們發布、點讚、在平台上回复或添加帖子書籤。馬斯克聲稱，此舉旨在打擊自動化機器人和垃圾郵件帳號的擴散。

The news was initially reported by X Daily News, an account dedicated to covering the latest updates on Musk's social media venture. According to the leaked document, the new policy is already in effect for X users in New Zealand and the Philippines.

該消息最初由 X Daily News 報道，該帳戶致力於報告馬斯克社交媒體事業的最新動態。根據洩漏的文件，新政策已經對紐西蘭和菲律賓的 X 用戶生效。

Musk himself confirmed the new policy in a tweet, stating that it was necessary to combat the relentless influx of bots. He pointed out that current AI and troll farms have advanced to the point where they can easily bypass "Are you a bot" tests, making it essential to implement a financial barrier for new user accounts.

馬斯克本人在推文中證實了這項新政策，並表示有必要打擊機器人的持續湧入。他指出，目前的人工智慧和巨魔農場已經發展到可以輕鬆繞過「你是機器人」測試的程度，因此有必要為新用戶帳戶設置財務障礙。

Ripple CTO's Reaction

Ripple CTO 的反應

David Schwartz, the Chief Technology Officer of Ripple, expressed strong opposition to Musk's fee proposal, arguing that it contradicts the principle of free speech that Musk has repeatedly advocated for. In a tweet directed at Musk, Schwartz questioned the rationale behind restricting lawful speech on the platform simply because it may be annoying.

Ripple首席技術官大衛·施瓦茨(David Schwartz)對馬斯克的收費提議表示強烈反對，認為這與馬斯克一再倡導的言論自由原則相矛盾。在針對馬斯克的推文中，施瓦茨質疑限制平台上合法言論的理由，只是因為這可能令人討厭。

"I thought you were against censoring any lawful speech on your platform," Schwartz tweeted. "Now, keeping some lawful speech off X just because it's annoying is so important that you're going to change the fundamental dynamics of the site to make it possible?!"

「我以為你反對審查你平台上的任何合法言論，」施瓦茨在推特上說。 “現在，僅僅因為一些合法言論令人厭煩而將其禁止在 X 上是如此重要，以至於您要改變該網站的基本動態以使其成為可能？！”

In response to a user who argued that the fee was not intended to silence bots but rather an entire political spectrum, Schwartz countered that the distinction lies in the type of speech one agrees with versus the speech one does not. He emphasized the importance of not hiding behind a facade of free speech but rather openly admitting that the protection of speech is often limited to those with whom one agrees.

一位用戶認為這筆費用不是為了壓制機器人，而是為了壓制整個政治領域，施瓦茨反駁說，差別在於人們同意的言論類型與不同意的言論類型。他強調不要躲在言論自由的表象後面，而要公開承認言論的保障往往只限於那些同意的人。

Efficacy of Fee-Based Deterrence

收費威懾的功效

ZachXBT, a prominent crypto investigator, expressed skepticism regarding the effectiveness of the fee-based approach in deterring crypto spam. He pointed out the prevalence of "business-verified" scam crypto accounts for which scammers have paid thousands of dollars. According to ZachXBT, a small fee may not be sufficient to discourage bad actors from creating these accounts.

著名的加密貨幣調查員 ZachXBT 對基於收費的方法在阻止加密垃圾郵件方面的有效性表示懷疑。他指出，「經過商業驗證」的騙局加密貨幣帳戶普遍存在，而騙子為此支付了數千美元。據 ZachXBT 稱，少量費用可能不足以阻止不良行為者創建這些帳戶。

Impact on Crypto Enthusiasts

對加密貨幣愛好者的影響

The proliferation of bots and spam accounts has been a persistent problem for crypto enthusiasts, especially the XRP Army. These accounts often promote fraudulent XRP giveaways and use images of Ripple executives to lend credibility to their schemes. Ripple has repeatedly issued warnings to its community about these scams.

機器人和垃圾郵件帳戶的激增一直是加密貨幣愛好者，尤其是 XRP 軍團面臨的一個持續存在的問題。這些帳戶經常宣傳欺詐性的 XRP 贈品，並使用 Ripple 高管的圖像來為他們的計劃提供可信度。 Ripple 已多次向其社群發出有關這些騙局的警告。

Conclusion

結論

The introduction of a fee for new X users has ignited a heated debate about the balance between free speech, spam prevention, and the effectiveness of financial barriers. While Musk claims that the fee is necessary to combat bots, critics argue that it could undermine the platform's commitment to open and uncensored communication. The long-term implications of this policy remain to be seen, but it is certain to continue shaping the ongoing discourse surrounding the future of social media and the role of technology in safeguarding free expression.

對新 X 用戶收取費用的做法引發了一場關於言論自由、垃圾郵件預防和財務壁壘有效性之間平衡的激烈爭論。儘管馬斯克聲稱這筆費用對於打擊機器人程序是必要的，但批評者認為，這可能會破壞該平台對開放和未經審查的通訊的承諾。這項政策的長期影響仍有待觀察，但它肯定會繼續影響圍繞社交媒體的未來以及技術在維護言論自由方面的作用的持續討論。