DeFi 下载：Linea 暂停区块链，Vitalik 反思以太坊，Uniswap 呼吁

以下是最近引起我 DeFi 关注的内容：

Good morning, Tim here.

早上好，蒂姆在这里。

Here’s what caught my DeFi-eye recently:

以下是最近引起我 DeFi 关注的内容：

Linea pauses blockchain

Linea 暂停区块链

Layer 2 network Linea paused transactions for an hour on Sunday after a protocol on the chain — Velocore — suffered a $7 million exploit.

周日，在链上协议 Velocore 遭受价值 700 万美元的攻击后，第 2 层网络 Linea 暂停了交易一个小时。

In an X thread, Linea said it halted the blockchain to protect users.

Linea 在 X 线程中表示，它暂停了区块链以保护用户。

Linea's team made a decision to halt block production by pausing the sequencer and censor attacker addresses to protect the users and builders in our ecosystem. Like other L2s, we are still in the "training wheels" phase of existence, giving us safeguards to use.

Linea 的团队决定通过暂停排序器和审查攻击者地址来停止区块生产，以保护我们生态系统中的用户和构建者。与其他 L2 一样，我们仍处于存在的“辅助轮”阶段，为我们提供了使用保障。

Linea’s actions likely prevented further losses from the exploit.

Linea 的行动可能阻止了该漏洞造成的进一步损失。

But the decision throws into question the industry’s founding principles: Immutability and user control.

但这一决定引发了对行业基本原则的质疑：不变性和用户控制。

Linea users, who have bridged almost $1.2 billion to the chain, couldn’t do anything with their assets while the blockchain was paused.

Linea 用户已将近 12 亿美元转入该链，但在区块链暂停期间，他们无法使用自己的资产进行任何操作。

The network paused and censored the attacker’s wallet because it’s still centrally controlled by its creator, Consensys.

网络暂停并审查了攻击者的钱包，因为它仍然由其创建者 Consensys 集中控制。

Bitcoin and Ethereum, are decentralised, and need a consensus of over 50% of their respective networks to do what Linea did.

比特币和以太坊是去中心化的，需要超过 50% 的各自网络达成共识才能完成 Linea 所做的事情。

The incident comes amid Linea’s Surge campaign, which rewards users with points for bridging assets to the layer 2.

该事件发生在 Linea 的 Surge 活动期间，该活动奖励将资产桥接到第 2 层的用户积分。

Vitalik reflects on Ethereum

Vitalik 对以太坊的反思

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin shared a list of things he would have done differently if he could go back to the blockchain’s 2014 inception.

以太坊联合创始人 Vitalik Buterin 分享了一系列事情，如果他能回到 2014 年区块链诞生之初，他会采取不同的做法。

Many things on Buterin’s list were technical changes to make developers’ lives easier.

Buterin 清单上的许多事情都是技术变革，旨在让开发人员的生活更轻松。

But one had a much broader impact: Speeding up Ethereum’s switch away from the energy-intensive Proof of Work validation mechanism.

但其中一个具有更广泛的影响：加速以太坊摆脱能源密集型工作证明验证机制。

“We could have saved a huge amount of trees if we had a much simpler Proof of Stake in 2018,” Buterin said.

“如果我们在 2018 年有一个更简单的权益证明，我们就可以拯救大量的树木，”Buterin 说。

Buterin lamented that it took until 2022 to move to Proof of Stake, suggesting a “crappier” switch earlier in the blockchain’s life would’ve been better.

Buterin 感叹直到 2022 年才转向权益证明，这表明在区块链生命早期进行“更糟糕”的转换会更好。

The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance estimates that Ethereum’s switch from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake reduced the network’s energy consumption by 99.9%.

剑桥替代金融中心估计，以太坊从工作量证明转向股权证明使网络的能源消耗减少了 99.9%。

If the change had come in 2018 as Buterin suggested, it could’ve saved over 80 terawatt-hours of electricity — about the yearly energy usage of Croatia.

如果按照 Buterin 的建议在 2018 年进行变革，则可以节省超过 80 太瓦时的电力——相当于克罗地亚每年的能源使用量。

Uniswap called out

Uniswap 喊出了

A last-minute decision to delay Uniswap’s fee-switch vote ruffled feathers in the DeFi community.

最后一刻推迟 Uniswap 费用转换投票的决定激怒了 DeFi 社区。

“Over the last week, a stakeholder raised a new issue relating to this work that requires additional diligence on our end to fully vet,” Erin Koen, the Uniswap Foundation’s governance lead, wrote Friday in the Uniswap DAO governance forum.

Uniswap 基金会治理负责人 Erin Koen 周五在 Uniswap DAO 治理论坛上写道：“上周，一位利益相关者提出了与这项工作相关的新问题，需要我们进行额外的努力才能进行全面审查。”

Koen didn’t elaborate on the issue or the required diligence.

科恩没有详细说明这个问题或所需的尽职调查。

That didn’t stop Dan Robinson, a general partner at crypto venture firm Paradigm, accusing the Uniswap Foundation of caving to pressure from another, unnamed VC.

但这并没有阻止加密风险投资公司 Paradigm 的普通合伙人 Dan Robinson 指责 Uniswap 基金会屈服于另一家未透露姓名的风险投资公司的压力。

“It’s disappointing to see a large VC try to bully the token governance process and delay community proposals at the last minute in order to advance their own pet projects,” he wrote on X.

他在 X 上写道：“看到一家大型风险投资公司试图在最后一刻欺凌代币治理流程并推迟社区提案，以推进自己喜欢的项目，这是令人失望的。”

Robinson didn’t elaborate in his post and didn’t immediately return DL News’ request for comment.

罗宾逊没有在帖子中详细说明，也没有立即回复 DL News 的置评请求。

Uniswap’s fee-switch vote is a long time coming.

Uniswap 的费用转换投票由来已久。

The vote, which if successful would allow for a portion of the Uniswap protocol’s revenue to be awarded to UNI token holders, passed a non-binding “temperature check” vote earlier this year.

今年早些时候，该投票通过了一项不具约束力的“温度检查”投票，如果成功，Uniswap 协议的部分收入将奖励给 UNI 代币持有者。

A binding, blockchain-based vote was set to begin Friday before it was postponed.

具有约束力的、基于区块链的投票原定于周五开始，但随后被推迟。

Uniswap Foundation CEO Devin Walsh declined to comment when contacted by DL News.

Uniswap 基金会首席执行官 Devin Walsh 在接受 DL News 联系时拒绝置评。

Data of the week

本周数据

Uniswap’s fee-switch vote could provide a steady stream of income for UNI token holders, if it passes.

如果 Uniswap 的费用转换投票获得通过，可以为 UNI 代币持有者提供稳定的收入来源。

DefiLlama data shows the top decentralised exchange took in almost $1.8 million in fees in 24 hours. That’s some $649.7 million annually.

DefiLlama 数据显示，顶级去中心化交易所在 24 小时内收取了近 180 万美元的费用。每年约为 6.497 亿美元。

The Uniswap protocol is the fourth-biggest in terms of fees generated. (DefiLlama)

就产生的费用而言，Uniswap 协议是第四大协议。 （德菲骆驼）

This week in DeFi governance

本周 DeFi 治理

VOTE: Arbitrum DAO supports improvement proposal for Account Abstraction wallets

投票：Arbitrum DAO 支持账户抽象钱包的改进提案

PROPOSAL: Stargate Foundation amends LayerZero token allocation process

提案：Stargate 基金会修改 LayerZero 代币分配流程

VOTE: Aave to adjust interest rate curve for weETH on Arbitrum and Base

投票：Aave 调整 Arbitrum 和 Base 上 weETH 的利率曲线

Post of the week

本周帖子

Pseudonymous crypto game studio founder Loopify sums up the current state of blockchain gaming with the timeless gold rush and shovels analogy.

匿名加密游戏工作室创始人 Loopify 用永恒的淘金热和铲子类比来总结区块链游戏的现状。

blockchain gaming chains and games pic.twitter.com/N5PruOKLFO

区块链游戏链和游戏 pic.twitter.com/N5PruOKLFO

What we’re watching

我们在看什么

Thank you to everyone who reached out following our post, offering ideas, support, and feedback. As a result of these conversations, we decided to drop all trademark applications for the term “

感谢所有关注我们的帖子、提供想法、支持和反馈的人。经过这些对话，我们决定放弃该术语的所有商标申请