DeFi 下載：Linea 暫停區塊鏈，Vitalik 反思以太坊，Uniswap 呼籲

以下是最近引起我 DeFi 關注的內容：

Good morning, Tim here.

早上好，提姆在這裡。

Here’s what caught my DeFi-eye recently:

以下是最近引起我 DeFi 關注的內容：

Linea pauses blockchain

Linea 暫停區塊鏈

Layer 2 network Linea paused transactions for an hour on Sunday after a protocol on the chain — Velocore — suffered a $7 million exploit.

週日，在鏈上協議 Velocore 遭受價值 700 萬美元的攻擊後，第 2 層網路 Linea 暫停了交易一個小時。

In an X thread, Linea said it halted the blockchain to protect users.

Linea 在 X 線程中表示，它暫停了區塊鏈以保護用戶。

Linea's team made a decision to halt block production by pausing the sequencer and censor attacker addresses to protect the users and builders in our ecosystem. Like other L2s, we are still in the "training wheels" phase of existence, giving us safeguards to use.

Linea 的團隊決定透過暫停排序器和審查攻擊者地址來停止區塊生產，以保護我們生態系統中的使用者和建構者。與其他 L2 一樣，我們仍處於存在的「輔助輪」階段，為我們提供了使用保障。

Linea’s actions likely prevented further losses from the exploit.

Linea 的行動可能阻止了漏洞造成的進一步損失。

But the decision throws into question the industry’s founding principles: Immutability and user control.

但這項決定引發了對產業基本原則的質疑：不變性和使用者控制。

Linea users, who have bridged almost $1.2 billion to the chain, couldn’t do anything with their assets while the blockchain was paused.

Linea 用戶已近 12 億美元轉入該鏈，但在區塊鏈暫停期間，他們無法使用自己的資產進行任何操作。

The network paused and censored the attacker’s wallet because it’s still centrally controlled by its creator, Consensys.

網路暫停並審查了攻擊者的錢包，因為它仍然由其創建者 Consensys 集中控制。

Bitcoin and Ethereum, are decentralised, and need a consensus of over 50% of their respective networks to do what Linea did.

比特幣和以太坊是去中心化的，需要超過 50% 的各自網路達成共識才能完成 Linea 所做的事情。

The incident comes amid Linea’s Surge campaign, which rewards users with points for bridging assets to the layer 2.

該事件發生在 Linea 的 Surge 活動期間，該活動獎勵將資產橋接到第 2 層的用戶積分。

Vitalik reflects on Ethereum

Vitalik 對以太坊的反思

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin shared a list of things he would have done differently if he could go back to the blockchain’s 2014 inception.

以太坊聯合創始人 Vitalik Buterin 分享了一系列事情，如果他能回到 2014 年區塊鏈誕生之初，他會採取不同的做法。

Many things on Buterin’s list were technical changes to make developers’ lives easier.

Buterin 清單上的許多事情都是技術變革，旨在讓開發人員的生活更輕鬆。

But one had a much broader impact: Speeding up Ethereum’s switch away from the energy-intensive Proof of Work validation mechanism.

但其中一個有更廣泛的影響：加速以太坊擺脫能源密集工作證明驗證機制。

“We could have saved a huge amount of trees if we had a much simpler Proof of Stake in 2018,” Buterin said.

「如果我們在 2018 年有一個更簡單的權益證明，我們就可以拯救大量的樹木，」Buterin 說。

Buterin lamented that it took until 2022 to move to Proof of Stake, suggesting a “crappier” switch earlier in the blockchain’s life would’ve been better.

Buterin 感嘆直到 2022 年才轉向權益證明，這表明在區塊鏈生命早期進行「更糟糕」的轉換會更好。

The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance estimates that Ethereum’s switch from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake reduced the network’s energy consumption by 99.9%.

劍橋替代金融中心估計，以太坊從工作量證明轉向股權證明使網路的能源消耗減少了 99.9%。

If the change had come in 2018 as Buterin suggested, it could’ve saved over 80 terawatt-hours of electricity — about the yearly energy usage of Croatia.

如果按照 Buterin 的建議在 2018 年進行變革，則可以節省超過 80 太瓦時的電力——相當於克羅埃西亞每年的能源使用量。

Uniswap called out

Uniswap 喊出了

A last-minute decision to delay Uniswap’s fee-switch vote ruffled feathers in the DeFi community.

最後一刻推遲 Uniswap 費用轉換投票的決定激怒了 DeFi 社群。

“Over the last week, a stakeholder raised a new issue relating to this work that requires additional diligence on our end to fully vet,” Erin Koen, the Uniswap Foundation’s governance lead, wrote Friday in the Uniswap DAO governance forum.

Uniswap 基金會治理負責人Erin Koen 週五在Uniswap DAO 治理論壇上寫道：「上週，一位利害關係人提出了與這項工作相關的新問題，需要我們進行額外的努力才能進行全面審查。 」

Koen didn’t elaborate on the issue or the required diligence.

科恩沒有詳細說明這個問題或所需的盡職調查。

That didn’t stop Dan Robinson, a general partner at crypto venture firm Paradigm, accusing the Uniswap Foundation of caving to pressure from another, unnamed VC.

但這並沒有阻止加密創投公司 Paradigm 的普通合夥人 Dan Robinson 指控 Uniswap 基金會屈服於另一家未透露姓名的創投公司的壓力。

“It’s disappointing to see a large VC try to bully the token governance process and delay community proposals at the last minute in order to advance their own pet projects,” he wrote on X.

他在 X 上寫道：“看到一家大型風險投資公司試圖在最後一刻欺凌代幣治理流程並推遲社區提案，以推進自己喜歡的項目，這是令人失望的。”

Robinson didn’t elaborate in his post and didn’t immediately return DL News’ request for comment.

羅賓遜沒有在帖子中詳細說明，也沒有立即回复 DL News 的置評請求。

Uniswap’s fee-switch vote is a long time coming.

Uniswap 的費用轉換投票由來已久。

The vote, which if successful would allow for a portion of the Uniswap protocol’s revenue to be awarded to UNI token holders, passed a non-binding “temperature check” vote earlier this year.

今年早些時候，該投票通過了一項不具約束力的「溫度檢查」投票，如果成功，Uniswap 協議的部分收入將獎勵給 UNI 代幣持有者。

A binding, blockchain-based vote was set to begin Friday before it was postponed.

具有約束力的、基於區塊鏈的投票原定於週五開始，但隨後被推遲。

Uniswap Foundation CEO Devin Walsh declined to comment when contacted by DL News.

Uniswap 基金會執行長 Devin Walsh 在接受 DL News 聯繫時拒絕置評。

Data of the week

本週數據

Uniswap’s fee-switch vote could provide a steady stream of income for UNI token holders, if it passes.

如果 Uniswap 的費用轉換投票獲得通過，可以為 UNI 代幣持有者提供穩定的收入來源。

DefiLlama data shows the top decentralised exchange took in almost $1.8 million in fees in 24 hours. That’s some $649.7 million annually.

DefiLlama 數據顯示，頂級去中心化交易所在 24 小時內收取了近 180 萬美元的費用。每年約 6.497 億美元。

The Uniswap protocol is the fourth-biggest in terms of fees generated. (DefiLlama)

就產生的費用而言，Uniswap 協議是第四大協議。 （德菲駱駝）

This week in DeFi governance

本週 DeFi 治理

VOTE: Arbitrum DAO supports improvement proposal for Account Abstraction wallets

投票：Arbitrum DAO 支援帳戶抽象錢包的改進提案

PROPOSAL: Stargate Foundation amends LayerZero token allocation process

提案：Stargate 基金會修改 LayerZero 代幣分配流程

VOTE: Aave to adjust interest rate curve for weETH on Arbitrum and Base

投票：Aave 調整 Arbitrum 和 Base 上 weETH 的利率曲線

Post of the week

本週貼文

Pseudonymous crypto game studio founder Loopify sums up the current state of blockchain gaming with the timeless gold rush and shovels analogy.

匿名加密遊戲工作室創始人 Loopify 以永恆的淘金熱和鏟子類比來總結區塊鏈遊戲的現狀。

blockchain gaming chains and games pic.twitter.com/N5PruOKLFO

區塊鏈遊戲鏈和遊戲 pic.twitter.com/N5PruOKLFO

What we’re watching

我們在看什麼

Thank you to everyone who reached out following our post, offering ideas, support, and feedback. As a result of these conversations, we decided to drop all trademark applications for the term “

感謝所有關注我們的貼文、提供想法、支持和回饋的人。經過這些對話，我們決定放棄該術語的所有商標申請