Crypto 4 特朗普的事情与比特币无关

是的，我知道，你来这里是为了让仇恨蔓延。你已经接受了所有的花言巧语。唐纳德·特朗普喜欢加密货币。他正在拥抱 DeFi。

This article argues that people who are voting for Donald Trump because they believe he will be good for crypto are mistaken. The author claims that the initiative known as Crypto 4 Trump is actually an alliance of large U.S.-based mining firms and exchanges that have banded together to spend heavily in an effort to put an end to the mistreatment that they have been subjected to. They are weary of being brought to court, harassed, and essentially driven out of the United States. And they certainly have cause to feel this way.

本文认为，那些因为相信唐纳德·特朗普对加密货币有利而投票支持他的人是错误的。作者声称，被称为 Crypto 4 Trump 的倡议实际上是美国大型矿业公司和交易所的联盟，这些公司联合起来投入巨资，努力结束他们所遭受的虐待。他们厌倦了被送上法庭、受到骚扰，甚至被驱逐出美国。他们当然有理由有这样的感觉。

However, the Bitcoin industry is not the same as the crypto sector. This was the same line of reasoning that was used to justify the Fork Wars, and to summarize, let's just say that it did not end well at all. If miners in the United States are forced to relocate, mining will continue in other parts of the world, and decentralizing the hashrate, as we observed with China's mining ban, is ultimately beneficial for Bitcoin™.

然而，比特币行业与加密行业不同。这与用来证明叉子战争合理性的推理是一样的，总而言之，我们只能说它的结局并不好。如果美国的矿工被迫搬迁，世界其他地区的采矿活动将继续进行，而正如我们在中国的采矿禁令中观察到的那样，散列率的去中心化最终对比特币™有利。

ASIC manufacturing may remain consolidated in a small number of international companies, that much is true. It's possible that rebuilding will take even longer. But other nations will capitalize on the opportunity, and the Bitcoin network will continue to function normally. Bitcoin might be our best chance at toppling all of the current superpowers and giving the developing world more authority. If it entails leaving the United States behind, then so be it.

ASIC 制造可能仍集中在少数国际公司中，这是事实。重建可能需要更长的时间。但其他国家将利用这个机会，比特币网络将继续正常运行。比特币可能是我们推翻当前所有超级大国并赋予发展中国家更多权力的最佳机会。如果这需要把美国抛在后面，那就这样吧。

Now, let's talk about the elephant in the room: a Kamala presidency will result in increased enforcement of U.S. securities laws, not a vote that will allow millions of alts to flourish. A victory for Trump almost certainly ensures only one possible outcome for our industry: the SEC will be defanged, which will put “coins other than Bitcoin” on a “level playing field.”

现在，让我们来谈谈房间里的大象：卡马拉担任总统将导致美国证券法的加强执行，而不是让数以百万计的另类投资蓬勃发展的投票。特朗普的胜利几乎肯定只会为我们的行业带来一个可能的结果：美国证券交易委员会将被削弱，这将使“比特币以外的货币”处于“公平的竞争环境”。

On the other hand, if the SEC continues to enforce its securities laws on the crypto industry, it will rightfully highlight the distinction between Bitcoin, which was distributed through proof-of-work (the only known method of avoiding securities sales), and the many centralized variants.

另一方面，如果美国证券交易委员会继续对加密行业执行其证券法，它将理所当然地强调通过工作量证明（唯一已知的避免证券销售的方法）分配的比特币与比特币之间的区别。许多集中式变体。

To put it another way, “crypto assets” are the ones that need a regulatory framework in order to survive, not Bitcoin, which is already decentralized enough. Forcing the builders in the crypto industry to follow these laws will undoubtedly benefit developers who are trying to expand these capabilities to Bitcoin, the only major cryptocurrency with a clear regulatory framework. Are we really going to argue that encouraging millions of developers to put their technology on Bitcoin (rather than Ethereum or Solana) would be a bad thing?

换句话说，“加密资产”是需要监管框架才能生存的资产，而不是已经足够去中心化的比特币。迫使加密行业的构建者遵守这些法律无疑将使那些试图将这些功能扩展到比特币的开发人员受益，比特币是唯一具有明确监管框架的主要加密货币。我们真的会认为鼓励数百万开发者将他们的技术放在比特币（而不是以太坊或 Solana）上是一件坏事吗？

If there is a single coherent thread running through Bitcoin maximalism, it is the assertion that everything outside of Bitcoin is either 1) a scam or 2) can be built on top of Bitcoin's blockchain. A continued crackdown on crypto will drive the market to investigate the second point more thoroughly. It would also drive up the price of MicroStrategy stock (MSTR), as it would remain one of the few widely accessible plays to get legitimate beta on Bitcoin.

如果有一条贯穿比特币最大化主义的单一连贯线索，那就是比特币之外的一切要么 1) 骗局，要么 2) 可以构建在比特币区块链之上。对加密货币的持续打击将促使市场更彻底地调查第二点。它还将推高 MicroStrategy 股票（MSTR）的价格，因为它仍然是为数不多的获得合法比特币测试版的广泛使用的股票之一。

Sure, the taxes on your Bitcoin profits may go up, and spending may continue to be penalized. But anon, I thought you were supposed to be HODLing anyway

当然，比特币利润的税收可能会增加，支出可能会继续受到惩罚。但不久之后，我认为你无论如何都应该持有

So, remind me, of all the supposedly pro-Bitcoin policies of a Trump presidency, what is it that you expect to get, other than state-sanctioned degeneracy and block propagation in the heartland? If you're a single-issue Bitcoin voter, shouldn't that mean voting for an option that makes Bitcoin more decentralized and less reliant on U.S. government policy? Allow me to reintroduce you to Madame President Harris, a bullish choice for Bitcoin.

所以，请提醒我，特朗普总统任期内所有所谓的支持比特币的政策，除了国家批准的堕落和中心地带的区块传播之外，你还期望得到什么？如果您是单一发行的比特币选民，这难道不应该意味着投票支持使比特币更加去中心化并且更少依赖美国政府政策的选项吗？请允许我向您重新介绍哈里斯总统女士，这是比特币的看涨选择。