比较5个现代AI聊天机器人：Grok 3，Chatgpt，DeepSeek，Claude和Gemini

现代AI聊天机器人似乎似乎相似，但是它们在原始性能方面有很大差异，以及用户每天与他们的互动方式。

Modern AI chatbots may seem like commodities, but they differ significantly in raw performance and how users interact with them daily. While there are several excellent models, we’ll be comparing five leading contenders: Grok 3, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Claude and Gemini.

现代AI聊天机器人似乎似乎是商品，但是它们在原始性能方面以及用户每天与他们的互动方式都有很大差异。虽然有几种出色的模型，但我们将比较五个主要竞争者：Grok 3，Chatgpt，Deepseek，Claude和Gemini。

The focus here is on user experience rather than lab benchmarks. We’ll be drawing on real-world evaluations and user feedback to highlight each model’s strengths, weaknesses and practical applications.

这里的重点是用户体验而不是实验室基准。我们将利用现实世界中的评估和用户反馈，以突出每个模型的优势，劣势和实际应用。

The analysis is structured around key factors users consider when choosing an AI: accessibility, integration, conversation style, performance, memory and safety. For the fidgety folk who’d rather skip the details, the quick comparison table below breaks down the pros and cons of each model at a glance.

该分析是围绕用户选择AI时考虑的关键因素进行构造的：可访问性，集成，对话样式，性能，记忆和安全性。对于宁愿跳过细节的烦躁的人来说，下面的快速比较表分解了每个模型的利弊。

Access and availability

访问和可用性

How easily can you use each AI, and what does it cost?

您可以如何轻松使用每个AI？

Let’s start by discussing platform availability (web, apps, API), pricing or subscription requirements and any usage limits that impact the everyday user.

首先，让我们讨论平台可用性（Web，Apps，API），定价或订阅要求以及影响日常用户的任何用法限制。

Integration and multimodal features

集成和多模式特征

How well does each AI integrate with other tools and handle different types of input/output?

每个AI都与其他工具集成并处理不同类型的输入/输出？

Next, let’s dive into ecosystem integration (office suites, plugins), support for image/audio inputs or outputs, and any unique tool-use capabilities that enhance user experience.

接下来，让我们深入研究生态系统集成（办公套房，插件），对图像/音频输入或输出的支持以及增强用户体验的任何独特的工具使用功能。

It doesn’t support images or audio and has no plugin ecosystem yet. Currently limited to web and the X app, Grok is more of a niche tool for X users than a widely integrated AI.

它不支持图像或音频，并且还没有插件生态系统。目前仅限于Web和X App，Grok比广泛集成的AI更像是X用户的利基工具。

GPT-4 can analyze images, charts and photos, while Plus users gain access to web browsing for real-time data. The API is widely adopted in third-party apps, and Microsoft has embedded GPT-4 into Bing Chat and Office Copilot, making ChatGPT a highly versatile AI.

GPT-4可以分析图像，图表和照片，而用户可以访问Web浏览以获取实时数据。 API在第三方应用程序中被广泛采用，Microsoft将GPT-4嵌入了Bing聊天和办公室副作用，使Chatgpt成为一种通用的AI。

Users can upload large files for text-based analysis. While it doesn’t offer plugins, it integrates into platforms like Notion (for document QA) and Slack (as a chatbot assistant). Positioned as a business-friendly alternative to ChatGPT, it’s designed for deep text processing rather than broad multimodal capabilities.

用户可以上传大型文件以进行基于文本的分析。虽然它不提供插件，但它将集成到诸如intion（用于文档QA）和Slack（作为聊天机器人助手）之类的平台中。它是一种友好型Chatgpt的替代品，是为深度文本处理而不是广泛的多模式功能而设计的。

While highly effective within Google’s ecosystem, its best features are most useful for Android, Chrome and Google app users.

尽管在Google的生态系统中非常有效，但其最佳功能对于Android，Chrome和Google App用户最有用。

It’s also smaller in size, with DeepMind reporting 52B parameters compared to GPT-4’s 600B parameters.

它的尺寸也较小，与GPT-4的600B参数相比，DeepMind报告52B参数。

Each model brings something unique to the table, catering to diverse user preferences and use cases.

每个模型都为表带来了独特的东西，可满足各种用户的喜好和用例。

Conversation style and personality

对话风格和个性

How does each AI “feel” to talk to?

每个AI都如何“感觉”与之交谈？

Let’s now compare the tone of responses, personality and how controllable or “steerable” each AI is during a conversation. These factors greatly influence user satisfaction in long chats or sensitive discussions.

现在，让我们比较每种AI在对话期间的反应，个性以及可控或“可声”的语气。这些因素极大地影响了长时间聊天或敏感讨论中的用户满意度。

Unlike more neutral AIs, Grok is designed to be less filtered, engaging in controversial topics within legal limits. While steerable, it may default to a playful tone unless explicitly told otherwise. This humor-forward approach can be fun but may not suit users who prefer a more professional or neutral AI.

与更中性的AI不同，Grok的设计量较少，从而在法律限制内参与了有争议的主题。虽然可协调，但除非明确说明另有说明，否则它可能会违约。这种幽默的方法可能很有趣，但可能不适合那些喜欢专业或中立的AI的用户。

A custom instructions feature allows users to adjust tone and style across sessions. Still, it can be rigid in mid-conversation, sticking closely to its last instructions rather than adapting fluidly. ChatGPT excels at structured, factual responses but may require prompting to sound more natural or engaging.

自定义说明功能允许用户在会话中调整音调和样式。尽管如此，它仍可以在中间进行僵硬，密切与最后的说明密切相关，而不是流畅地调整。 Chatgpt擅长于结构化的事实响应，但可能需要提示听起来更自然或引人入胜。

It’s suitable for direct responses but less engaging for creative or emotional discussions. Additionally, its tuning is minimal, meaning it may require fact-checking for accuracy. It is best suited for users who value speed and directness over conversational depth.

它适用于直接响应，但对于创造性或情感讨论而言，它不太参与。此外，它的调整很小，这意味着它可能需要进行事实检查以确保准确性。它最适合那些将速度和直接性高于对话深度的用户。

While it follows ethical guidelines, it’s less prone to overcautious refusals, making responses feel more natural. However, it can be verbose, occasionally overexplaining. If you prefer an AI that feels patient and understanding, Claude is an excellent choice.

尽管它遵循道德准则，但它不太容易拒绝，这使回应变得更加自然。但是，它可以是冗长的，有时会过度解释。如果您喜欢一个感到耐心和理解的AI，那么克劳德是一个绝佳的选择。

It also allows query edits after receiving a response, adding flexibility. Strong content moderation ensures respectful and neutral dialogue, sometimes leading to simpler explanations than ChatGPT’s in-depth approach.

它还可以在收到响应后的查询编辑，从而增加了灵活性。强大的内容适度可确保尊重和中立的对话，有时会导致比Chatgpt的深入方法更简单的解释。

Performance and use cases

性能和用例

How does each AI fare in real-world tasks?

每个AI在实际任务中如何票价？

We compare strengths and weaknesses in practical evaluations, from writing and coding to reasoning and creativity. Rather than theoretical ability, we focus on what users and tests have reported in everyday usage.

我们比较从写作和编码到推理和创造力的实践评估中的优势和缺点。我们专注于用户和测试在日常使用中报告的内容，而不是理论上的能力。

Creatively, its humor and irreverent tone can be an asset, making it stand out for casual or witty writing. However, it can be inconsistent in structured tasks and lacks a broad track record. A strong option for real-time insights and entertainment, but still developing in professional applications.

从创造性上讲，它的幽默和不敬虔的语气可以成为一种资产，使其在休闲或机智的写作中脱颖而出。但是，它在结构化任务中可能是不一致的，并且缺乏广泛的记录。实时见解和娱乐的强大选择，但仍在专业应用中发展。

While ChatGPT’s free version lacks real-time knowledge updates, the Plus plan with browsing and plugins helps bridge that gap. It’s a jack-of-all-trades, great for writing, brainstorming and debugging, though it can occasionally falter in mathematical precision.

尽管Chatgpt的免费版本缺乏实时知识更新，但带有浏览和插件的加上计划有助于弥合差距。这是一个全面的贸易，非常适合写作，集思广益和调试，尽管它偶尔会在数学精确度上步履蹒跚。

However, its writing tends to be factual and to the point, lacking the creative depth of ChatGPT or Claude. While it

但是，它的著作往往是事实，而且缺乏Chatgpt或Claude的创造性深度。同时