比較5個現代AI聊天機器人：Grok 3，Chatgpt，DeepSeek，Claude和Gemini

現代AI聊天機器人似乎似乎相似，但是它們在原始性能方面有很大差異，以及用戶每天與他們的互動方式。

Modern AI chatbots may seem like commodities, but they differ significantly in raw performance and how users interact with them daily. While there are several excellent models, we’ll be comparing five leading contenders: Grok 3, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Claude and Gemini.

現代AI聊天機器人似乎似乎是商品，但是它們在原始性能方面以及用戶每天與他們的互動方式都有很大差異。雖然有幾種出色的模型，但我們將比較五個主要競爭者：Grok 3，Chatgpt，Deepseek，Claude和Gemini。

The focus here is on user experience rather than lab benchmarks. We’ll be drawing on real-world evaluations and user feedback to highlight each model’s strengths, weaknesses and practical applications.

這裡的重點是用戶體驗而不是實驗室基準。我們將利用現實世界中的評估和用戶反饋，以突出每個模型的優勢，劣勢和實際應用。

The analysis is structured around key factors users consider when choosing an AI: accessibility, integration, conversation style, performance, memory and safety. For the fidgety folk who’d rather skip the details, the quick comparison table below breaks down the pros and cons of each model at a glance.

該分析是圍繞用戶選擇AI時考慮的關鍵因素進行構造的：可訪問性，集成，對話樣式，性能，記憶和安全性。對於寧願跳過細節的煩躁的人來說，下面的快速比較表分解了每個模型的利弊。

Access and availability

訪問和可用性

How easily can you use each AI, and what does it cost?

您可以如何輕鬆使用每個AI？

Let’s start by discussing platform availability (web, apps, API), pricing or subscription requirements and any usage limits that impact the everyday user.

首先，讓我們討論平台可用性（Web，Apps，API），定價或訂閱要求以及影響日常用戶的任何用法限制。

Integration and multimodal features

集成和多模式特徵

How well does each AI integrate with other tools and handle different types of input/output?

每個AI都與其他工具集成並處理不同類型的輸入/輸出？

Next, let’s dive into ecosystem integration (office suites, plugins), support for image/audio inputs or outputs, and any unique tool-use capabilities that enhance user experience.

接下來，讓我們深入研究生態系統集成（辦公套房，插件），對圖像/音頻輸入或輸出的支持以及增強用戶體驗的任何獨特的工具使用功能。

It doesn’t support images or audio and has no plugin ecosystem yet. Currently limited to web and the X app, Grok is more of a niche tool for X users than a widely integrated AI.

它不支持圖像或音頻，並且還沒有插件生態系統。目前僅限於Web和X App，Grok比廣泛集成的AI更像是X用戶的利基工具。

GPT-4 can analyze images, charts and photos, while Plus users gain access to web browsing for real-time data. The API is widely adopted in third-party apps, and Microsoft has embedded GPT-4 into Bing Chat and Office Copilot, making ChatGPT a highly versatile AI.

GPT-4可以分析圖像，圖表和照片，而用戶可以訪問Web瀏覽以獲取實時數據。 API在第三方應用程序中被廣泛採用，Microsoft將GPT-4嵌入了Bing聊天和辦公室副作用，使Chatgpt成為一種通用的AI。

Users can upload large files for text-based analysis. While it doesn’t offer plugins, it integrates into platforms like Notion (for document QA) and Slack (as a chatbot assistant). Positioned as a business-friendly alternative to ChatGPT, it’s designed for deep text processing rather than broad multimodal capabilities.

用戶可以上傳大型文件以進行基於文本的分析。雖然它不提供插件，但它將集成到諸如intion（用於文檔QA）和Slack（作為聊天機器人助手）之類的平台中。它是一種友好型Chatgpt的替代品，是為深度文本處理而不是廣泛的多模式功能而設計的。

While highly effective within Google’s ecosystem, its best features are most useful for Android, Chrome and Google app users.

儘管在Google的生態系統中非常有效，但其最佳功能對於Android，Chrome和Google App用戶最有用。

It’s also smaller in size, with DeepMind reporting 52B parameters compared to GPT-4’s 600B parameters.

它的尺寸也較小，與GPT-4的600B參數相比，DeepMind報告52B參數。

Each model brings something unique to the table, catering to diverse user preferences and use cases.

每個模型都為錶帶來了獨特的東西，可滿足各種用戶的喜好和用例。

Conversation style and personality

對話風格和個性

How does each AI “feel” to talk to?

每個AI都如何“感覺”與之交談？

Let’s now compare the tone of responses, personality and how controllable or “steerable” each AI is during a conversation. These factors greatly influence user satisfaction in long chats or sensitive discussions.

現在，讓我們比較每種AI在對話期間的反應，個性以及可控或“可聲”的語氣。這些因素極大地影響了長時間聊天或敏感討論中的用戶滿意度。

Unlike more neutral AIs, Grok is designed to be less filtered, engaging in controversial topics within legal limits. While steerable, it may default to a playful tone unless explicitly told otherwise. This humor-forward approach can be fun but may not suit users who prefer a more professional or neutral AI.

與更中性的AI不同，Grok的設計量較少，從而在法律限制內參與了有爭議的主題。雖然可協調，但除非明確說明另有說明，否則它可能會違約。這種幽默的方法可能很有趣，但可能不適合那些喜歡專業或中立的AI的用戶。

A custom instructions feature allows users to adjust tone and style across sessions. Still, it can be rigid in mid-conversation, sticking closely to its last instructions rather than adapting fluidly. ChatGPT excels at structured, factual responses but may require prompting to sound more natural or engaging.

自定義說明功能允許用戶在會話中調整音調和样式。儘管如此，它仍可以在中間進行僵硬，密切與最後的說明密切相關，而不是流暢地調整。 Chatgpt擅長於結構化的事實響應，但可能需要提示聽起來更自然或引人入勝。

It’s suitable for direct responses but less engaging for creative or emotional discussions. Additionally, its tuning is minimal, meaning it may require fact-checking for accuracy. It is best suited for users who value speed and directness over conversational depth.

它適用於直接響應，但對於創造性或情感討論而言，它不太參與。此外，它的調整很小，這意味著它可能需要進行事實檢查以確保准確性。它最適合那些將速度和直接性高於對話深度的用戶。

While it follows ethical guidelines, it’s less prone to overcautious refusals, making responses feel more natural. However, it can be verbose, occasionally overexplaining. If you prefer an AI that feels patient and understanding, Claude is an excellent choice.

儘管它遵循道德準則，但它不太容易拒絕，這使回應變得更加自然。但是，它可以是冗長的，有時會過度解釋。如果您喜歡一個感到耐心和理解的AI，那麼克勞德是一個絕佳的選擇。

It also allows query edits after receiving a response, adding flexibility. Strong content moderation ensures respectful and neutral dialogue, sometimes leading to simpler explanations than ChatGPT’s in-depth approach.

它還可以在收到響應後的查詢編輯，從而增加了靈活性。強大的內容適度可確保尊重和中立的對話，有時會導致比Chatgpt的深入方法更簡單的解釋。

Performance and use cases

性能和用例

How does each AI fare in real-world tasks?

每個AI在實際任務中如何票價？

We compare strengths and weaknesses in practical evaluations, from writing and coding to reasoning and creativity. Rather than theoretical ability, we focus on what users and tests have reported in everyday usage.

我們比較從寫作和編碼到推理和創造力的實踐評估中的優勢和缺點。我們專注於用戶和測試在日常使用中報告的內容，而不是理論上的能力。

Creatively, its humor and irreverent tone can be an asset, making it stand out for casual or witty writing. However, it can be inconsistent in structured tasks and lacks a broad track record. A strong option for real-time insights and entertainment, but still developing in professional applications.

從創造性上講，它的幽默和不敬虔的語氣可以成為一種資產，使其在休閒或機智的寫作中脫穎而出。但是，它在結構化任務中可能是不一致的，並且缺乏廣泛的記錄。實時見解和娛樂的強大選擇，但仍在專業應用中發展。

While ChatGPT’s free version lacks real-time knowledge updates, the Plus plan with browsing and plugins helps bridge that gap. It’s a jack-of-all-trades, great for writing, brainstorming and debugging, though it can occasionally falter in mathematical precision.

儘管Chatgpt的免費版本缺乏實時知識更新，但帶有瀏覽和插件的加上計劃有助於彌合差距。這是一個全面的貿易，非常適合寫作，集思廣益和調試，儘管它偶爾會在數學精確度上步履蹣跚。

However, its writing tends to be factual and to the point, lacking the creative depth of ChatGPT or Claude. While it

但是，它的著作往往是事實，而且缺乏Chatgpt或Claude的創造性深度。同時