Bitget首席执行官Gracy Chen猛烈抨击超级流动性最近的剥削为“不成熟，不道德和不专业”

由于Bitget首席执行官Gracy Chen受到尖锐的批评，围绕Hyplliquid最近的利用的戏剧继续升级。

Bitget CEO Gracy Chen has launched a scathing critique of Hyperliquid for its handling of the recent exploit incident. The drama unfolded with claims of $JELLY token manipulation on Hyperliquid, resulting in reported seven-figure losses for traders.

Bitget首席执行官Gracy Chen因处理最近的剥削事件而对Hyplliquid发起了严厉的批评。这部戏的宣称是$果冻代币对超流动性操纵的说法，导致贸易商据报道造成了七位数的损失。

In a strongly worded Twitter post, Chen described Hyperliquid’s response as immature, unethical, and unprofessional, adding that it prioritized the platform over the traders.

在措辞强烈的Twitter帖子中，陈将超流动性的反应描述为不成熟，不道德和不专业，并补充说，它优先考虑平台而不是交易者。

Her harsh critique also touched upon Hyperliquid's decision to force-settle $JELLY positions at favorable prices, which Chen said sets a dangerous precedent for decentralized exchanges.

她的严厉批评还谈到了超级流利组织以有利的价格强迫果冻职位的决定，陈表示，这为分散交流设定了危险的先例。

Chen went on to compare Hyperliquid's operational structure to an offshore centralized exchange (CEX) due to its lack of KYC/AML protocols, which she argued are crucial for preventing illicit activity.

由于缺乏KYC/AML协议，Chen继续将超流动性的运营结构与海上集中交易（CEX）进行了比较，她认为这对于防止非法活动至关重要。

Moreover, she highlighted flaws in Hyperliquid's product design—such as mixed vaults that may expose users to several types of systemic risks and unrestricted position sizes that can be used for leveraged market manipulation.

此外，她强调了Hyproliquid产品设计中的缺陷，例如混合的金库，可能使用户面临几种类型的系统性风险和不受限制的位置大小，可用于杠杆市场的操纵。

The Bitget CEO warned that these vulnerabilities, if left unaddressed, could make Hyperliquid susceptible to further attacks, potentially putting it on track to become, as she put it, “the next catastrophic failure in crypto.”

BITGET首席执行官警告说，这些脆弱性，如果尚未解决，可能会使超流利易受进一步的攻击，这可能使其正如她所说的那样，“在加密货币中的下一个灾难性失败。”

During the rant, Gracy Chen went as far as to compare Hyperliquid to the infamous bankrupt exchange FTX: “Hyperliquid may be on track to become FTX 2.0”, she said.

在咆哮期间，格雷西·陈（Gracy Chen）甚至将超流动性与臭名昭著的破产交易所FTX进行了比较：“超流动可能会成为FTX 2.0的正轨”，她说。

However, despite some of Chen’s criticisms being valid, the majority of the cryptocurrency community appeared to disagree, or at least found the comments distasteful, since she was talking about a direct competitor.

但是，尽管陈的批评有效，但大多数加密货币社区似乎不同意，或者至少发现评论令人讨厌，因为她在谈论直接竞争对手。

“If protecting thousands of people from a bad actor is unethical, you have your priorities in the wrong place,” one user remarked.

一位用户说：“如果保护成千上万的人免受坏演员的不道德不道德，那么您的优先事项在错误的位置。”

Others argued that Bitget, in a similar scenario, would likely have delisted the token too.

其他人则认为，在类似的情况下，Bitget也可能会使令牌脱颖而出。

Critics also suggested that Hyperliquid's actions demonstrated responsible decision-making during a volatile situation. Certainly, the backlash highlighted a divide in how the community perceives exchange responsibilities, with some prioritizing proactive measures over claims of centralization risks.

批评家还建议，超流动性的行动表现出在动荡的情况下负责任的决策。当然，这种反弹强调了社区如何看待交流职责的鸿沟，并通过某些优先级的主动措施超过了集中化风险的索赔。