Bitget首席執行官Gracy Chen猛烈抨擊超級流動性最近的剝削為“不成熟，不道德和不專業”

由於Bitget首席執行官Gracy Chen受到尖銳的批評，圍繞Hyplliquid最近的利用的戲劇繼續升級。

Bitget CEO Gracy Chen has launched a scathing critique of Hyperliquid for its handling of the recent exploit incident. The drama unfolded with claims of $JELLY token manipulation on Hyperliquid, resulting in reported seven-figure losses for traders.

Bitget首席執行官Gracy Chen因處理最近的剝削事件而對Hyplliquid發起了嚴厲的批評。這部戲的宣稱是$果凍代幣對超流動性操縱的說法，導致貿易商據報導造成了七位數的損失。

In a strongly worded Twitter post, Chen described Hyperliquid’s response as immature, unethical, and unprofessional, adding that it prioritized the platform over the traders.

在措辭強烈的Twitter帖子中，陳將超流動性的反應描述為不成熟，不道德和不專業，並補充說，它優先考慮平台而不是交易者。

Her harsh critique also touched upon Hyperliquid's decision to force-settle $JELLY positions at favorable prices, which Chen said sets a dangerous precedent for decentralized exchanges.

她的嚴厲批評還談到了超級流利組織以有利的價格強迫果凍職位的決定，陳表示，這為分散交流設定了危險的先例。

Chen went on to compare Hyperliquid's operational structure to an offshore centralized exchange (CEX) due to its lack of KYC/AML protocols, which she argued are crucial for preventing illicit activity.

由於缺乏KYC/AML協議，Chen繼續將超流動性的運營結構與海上集中交易（CEX）進行了比較，她認為這對於防止非法活動至關重要。

Moreover, she highlighted flaws in Hyperliquid's product design—such as mixed vaults that may expose users to several types of systemic risks and unrestricted position sizes that can be used for leveraged market manipulation.

此外，她強調了Hyproliquid產品設計中的缺陷，例如混合的金庫，可能使用戶面臨幾種類型的系統性風險和不受限制的位置大小，可用於槓桿市場的操縱。

The Bitget CEO warned that these vulnerabilities, if left unaddressed, could make Hyperliquid susceptible to further attacks, potentially putting it on track to become, as she put it, “the next catastrophic failure in crypto.”

BITGET首席執行官警告說，這些脆弱性，如果尚未解決，可能會使超流利易受進一步的攻擊，這可能使其正如她所說的那樣，“在加密貨幣中的下一個災難性失敗。”

During the rant, Gracy Chen went as far as to compare Hyperliquid to the infamous bankrupt exchange FTX: “Hyperliquid may be on track to become FTX 2.0”, she said.

在咆哮期間，格雷西·陳（Gracy Chen）甚至將超流動性與臭名昭著的破產交易所FTX進行了比較：“超流動可能會成為FTX 2.0的正軌”，她說。

However, despite some of Chen’s criticisms being valid, the majority of the cryptocurrency community appeared to disagree, or at least found the comments distasteful, since she was talking about a direct competitor.

但是，儘管陳的批評有效，但大多數加密貨幣社區似乎不同意，或者至少發現評論令人討厭，因為她在談論直接競爭對手。

“If protecting thousands of people from a bad actor is unethical, you have your priorities in the wrong place,” one user remarked.

一位用戶說：“如果保護成千上萬的人免受壞演員的不道德不道德，那麼您的優先事項在錯誤的位置。”

Others argued that Bitget, in a similar scenario, would likely have delisted the token too.

其他人則認為，在類似的情況下，Bitget也可能會使令牌脫穎而出。

Critics also suggested that Hyperliquid's actions demonstrated responsible decision-making during a volatile situation. Certainly, the backlash highlighted a divide in how the community perceives exchange responsibilities, with some prioritizing proactive measures over claims of centralization risks.

批評家還建議，超流動性的行動表現出在動蕩的情況下負責任的決策。當然，這種反彈強調了社區如何看待交流職責的鴻溝，並通過某些優先級的主動措施超過了集中化風險的索賠。