比特币老兵埃里克·沃希斯（Erik Voorhees）正在为他看不到的趋势挠头

比特币资深人士埃里克·沃希斯（Erik Voorhees）正在嘲笑他没有看到的趋势。他在X周日早些时候的一篇文章中说：“我不会预测一群比特币成为贸易保护主义者，因为一位政客告诉他们这将有助于经济。”

Erik Voorhees, a well-known figure in the Bitcoin community, expressed his astonishment on X (formerly Twitter) over a trend he didn’t see coming.

比特币社区中著名人物埃里克·沃希斯（Erik Voorhees）在他没有看到的趋势上对X（以前是Twitter）表示惊讶。

“I would not have predicted a bunch of Bitcoiners becoming protectionists because a politician told them it would help the economy,” Voorhees stated.

Voorhees说：“我不会预测一群比特币成为贸易保护主义者，因为一位政客告诉他们这将有助于经济。”

His comment was met with a flurry of reactions, largely in disbelief.

他的评论遇到了一系列反应，主要是难以置信的。

One commenter replied, “The libertarian dream died for us in 2017. It’s mostly just bubble chasing hypebeasts left trying to make a quick buck.”

一位评论者回答说：“自由主义者的梦想在2017年为我们丧生。这主要是在试图快速赚钱的爆发次数。”

Another chipped in, “It was obvious when their main goal politically was to get the government to buy more bitcoin instead of protecting developers from being jailed or self custody.”

另一个人说：“很明显，他们的主要目标是让政府购买更多比特币，而不是保护开发商免于被判入狱或自我监护。”

The broader takeaway from the thread is that Bitcoin’s ideological base might be cracking under the weight of political influence and market speculation.

该线程的更广泛的收获是，比特币的意识形态基础可能在政治影响力和市场投机的重量下破裂。

One user sarcastically noted how “don't trust, verify” has turned into “trust the tariff guy, he's got a plan.”

一位用户讽刺地指出，“不信任，验证”如何变成“信任关税家伙，他有一个计划。”

Even some long-time observers expressed shock. “Did not have bitcoiners cheering for tariffs to make the Fed print money on my bingo card.”

即使是一些长期观察者也表示震惊。 “没有比特币的比特币要为您的宾果卡上的收益打印的关税加油。”

Still, a few voices tried to rationalize the shift. One argument went, “Better to use tariffs than raise income taxes. At least that way foreigners will end up subsidizing part of the pain.”

尽管如此，一些声音还是试图合理化这一转变。一个论点说：“使用关税比提高所得税更好。至少这样，外国人最终会补贴部分痛苦。”

But that didn't sit well with many in the crypto space, who feel the community is losing sight of what it originally stood for. As one commenter put it, “The whole point was always about borderless, free market exchange.”

但这与加密货币空间中的许多人相处并不理想，他们觉得社区正在忽视其最初的代表。正如一位评论者所说，“整个要点始终是关于无边界的自由市场交流。”

Some suggested this shift isn’t about policy at all, but about blind loyalty to political figures.

一些人建议这种转变根本不是关于政策的，而是关于政治人物的盲目忠诚。

“Cults of personality are often underestimated by the people who are outside of those targeted.”

“人格崇拜常常被目标人士以外的人低估。”

In the end, Voorhees’ surprise seems to reflect a broader disillusionment among early adopters. Bitcoin was born out of a desire for decentralization and freedom from government interference. Now, even some of its loudest supporters are calling for state action, as long as it benefits them.

最后，Voorhees的惊喜似乎反映了早期采用者的更广泛的幻灭。比特币是出于对权力下放和免于政府干预的自由的渴望而诞生的。现在，即使是最大的支持者也呼吁国家行动，只要它使他们受益。