比特幣老兵埃里克·沃希斯（Erik Voorhees）正在為他看不到的趨勢撓頭

比特幣資深人士埃里克·沃希斯（Erik Voorhees）正在嘲笑他沒有看到的趨勢。他在X週日早些時候的一篇文章中說：“我不會預測一群比特幣成為貿易保護主義者，因為一位政客告訴他們這將有助於經濟。”

Erik Voorhees, a well-known figure in the Bitcoin community, expressed his astonishment on X (formerly Twitter) over a trend he didn’t see coming.

比特幣社區中著名人物埃里克·沃希斯（Erik Voorhees）在他沒有看到的趨勢上對X（以前是Twitter）表示驚訝。

“I would not have predicted a bunch of Bitcoiners becoming protectionists because a politician told them it would help the economy,” Voorhees stated.

Voorhees說：“我不會預測一群比特幣成為貿易保護主義者，因為一位政客告訴他們這將有助於經濟。”

His comment was met with a flurry of reactions, largely in disbelief.

他的評論遇到了一系列反應，主要是難以置信的。

One commenter replied, “The libertarian dream died for us in 2017. It’s mostly just bubble chasing hypebeasts left trying to make a quick buck.”

一位評論者回答說：“自由主義者的夢想在2017年為我們喪生。這主要是在試圖快速賺錢的爆發次數。”

Another chipped in, “It was obvious when their main goal politically was to get the government to buy more bitcoin instead of protecting developers from being jailed or self custody.”

另一個人說：“很明顯，他們的主要目標是讓政府購買更多比特幣，而不是保護開發商免於被判入獄或自我監護。”

The broader takeaway from the thread is that Bitcoin’s ideological base might be cracking under the weight of political influence and market speculation.

該線程的更廣泛的收穫是，比特幣的意識形態基礎可能在政治影響力和市場投機的重量下破裂。

One user sarcastically noted how “don't trust, verify” has turned into “trust the tariff guy, he's got a plan.”

一位用戶諷刺地指出，“不信任，驗證”如何變成“信任關稅傢伙，他有一個計劃。”

Even some long-time observers expressed shock. “Did not have bitcoiners cheering for tariffs to make the Fed print money on my bingo card.”

即使是一些長期觀察者也表示震驚。 “沒有比特幣的比特幣要為您的賓果卡上的收益打印的關稅加油。”

Still, a few voices tried to rationalize the shift. One argument went, “Better to use tariffs than raise income taxes. At least that way foreigners will end up subsidizing part of the pain.”

儘管如此，一些聲音還是試圖合理化這一轉變。一個論點說：“使用關稅比提高所得稅更好。至少這樣，外國人最終會補貼部分痛苦。”

But that didn't sit well with many in the crypto space, who feel the community is losing sight of what it originally stood for. As one commenter put it, “The whole point was always about borderless, free market exchange.”

但這與加密貨幣空間中的許多人相處並不理想，他們覺得社區正在忽視其最初的代表。正如一位評論者所說，“整個要點始終是關於無邊界的自由市場交流。”

Some suggested this shift isn’t about policy at all, but about blind loyalty to political figures.

一些人建議這種轉變根本不是關於政策的，而是關於政治人物的盲目忠誠。

“Cults of personality are often underestimated by the people who are outside of those targeted.”

“人格崇拜常常被目標人士以外的人低估。”

In the end, Voorhees’ surprise seems to reflect a broader disillusionment among early adopters. Bitcoin was born out of a desire for decentralization and freedom from government interference. Now, even some of its loudest supporters are calling for state action, as long as it benefits them.

最後，Voorhees的驚喜似乎反映了早期採用者的更廣泛的幻滅。比特幣是出於對權力下放和免於政府乾預的自由的渴望而誕生的。現在，即使是最大的支持者也呼籲國家行動，只要它使他們受益。