Coinbase的第2层网络基础，引发了高辛烷值的交易疯狂

Coinbase的第2层网络Base在发表有关分散的链上媒体协议Zora的帖子后，本周引发了高辛烷值交易的疯狂。

Coinbase’s Layer 2 network, Base, is cooking up a high-octane trading frenzy this week with a post on Zora, a decentralized on-chain media protocol. The post, titled “Base is for everyone,” was instantly minted into a tradable ERC-20 token through Zora’s content-to-coin infrastructure, quickly gaining viral traction across crypto Twitter.

Coinbase的第2层网络Base，本周正在烹饪高辛烷值交易狂潮，并在分散的链上媒体协议Zora上发表了一篇文章。该帖子的标题为“基础是每个人”，通过Zora的内容到Coin基础架构，立即被铸造成可交易的ERC-20代币，在Crypto Twitter上迅速获得了病毒牵引力。

Base is for everyone. pic.twitter.com/gq3lLLuXO1

基础适合所有人。 pic.twitter.com/gq3llluxo1

Base’s official X (formerly Twitter) account shared the post, which triggered an automatic token mint on Zora. Despite the Zora page prominently displaying a disclaimer that the asset was not an official Base token, that didn’t stop traders from piling in.

Base的官方X（以前是Twitter）帐户分享了该帖子，该帖子触发了Zora上的自动令牌薄荷。尽管Zora页面突出显示了免责声明，即资产不是正式的基础令牌，但这并没有阻止交易者堆积。

Within hours, the token’s valuation exploded to $13 million, fueled by speculation and a fear of missing out. But just as quickly as it rose, the token crashed, losing 92% of its value and dropping to a market cap of $1 million within three hours. The frenzy highlighted just how powerful Coinbase’s broader ecosystem influence can be even without direct involvement.

在几个小时之内，令牌的估值爆炸至1300万美元，这是由于猜测和害怕错过的刺激。但是随着它上升的速度，代币崩溃了，损失了其价值的92％，并在三个小时内下降到100万美元的市值。疯狂的表明，即使没有直接参与，也可以强大的Coinbase更广泛的生态系统影响力。

As of the latest data from DEXScreener, the token has rebounded slightly, gaining 20% in the last hour to trade around $0.007. The wild swings have drawn both criticism and intrigue, with many in the crypto community debating whether this was a case of irresponsible hype or a bold experiment in onchain content creation.

从DexScreener的最新数据开始，令牌略有反弹，在最后一个小时内获得了20％的股份，交易约为0.007美元。狂野的波动引起了批评和阴谋，在加密货币社区中，许多人在辩论这是不负责任的炒作的情况，还是对OnChain Content Creation的大胆实验。

Coinbase Explains Onchain Experiment with Zora

Coinbase解释了Zora的OnChain实验

Later in the evening, Base responded publicly, clarifying its intentions behind using Zora and emphasizing the value of experimenting in public.

傍晚，基地公开回应，澄清了其使用Zora背后的意图，并强调了在公共场合进行实验的价值。

“Base is posting on Zora because we believe everyone should bring their content onchain, and use the tools that make it possible,” the account posted on X. “If we want the future to be onchain, we have to be willing to experiment in public. That’s what we’re doing.”

X上发布的帐户：“基地在Zora上发布Zora，因为我们相信每个人都应该将其内容带到OnChain上，并使用使其成为可能的工具。

Base is posting on Zora because we believe everyone should bring their content onchain, and use the tools that make it possible.Memes. Moments. Culture.If we want the future to be onchain, we have to be willing to experiment in public. That’s what we’re doing. To be clear,…

Base发布在Zora上，因为我们相信每个人都应该将其内容on Chain带来，并使用使其成为可能的工具。时刻。文化。如果我们希望未来成为链，我们必须愿意在公开场合进行试验。那就是我们正在做的。要清楚，…

Zora itself replied with a cryptic message: “study Zora.” The protocol also retweeted pseudonymous user Larp von Trier, who summed up the situation with sharp sarcasm:

Zora本身回答了一个隐秘的信息：“研究Zora。”该协议还转发了伪用户Larp von Trier，他以尖锐的讽刺总结了这种情况：

Solana Manlets had no idea about how Zora works and got rekt.

Solana Manlets不知道Zora的工作原理并获得了Rekt。

Not everyone was amused. Hantao Yuan, co-founder of the quest-to-earn platform Moku, raised red flags over the token’s distribution. According to Yuan, the top three wallets had a combined 47% of the supply, with one wallet alone controlling 25.6%. He also alleged that automated trading bots were manipulating the token chart and suggested that up to 2,500 wallets, potentially new users on the Base network, were rugged in the process.

并不是每个人都很开心。 Quest-to-to-to-to-Earn Platform Moku的联合创始人Hantao Yuan在代币的发行版中提出了危险信号。根据Yuan的说法，前三个钱包的总供应量的47％，仅一个钱包控制了25.6％。他还声称，自动交易机器人正在操纵令牌图表，并建议在此过程中加强了多达2500个钱包，可能是基本网络上的新用户。

Let me get this straight> base tweets a token on their main account> Top 3 holders had 47% of the supply (sold a lot)> Jesse defends it> Posts 2 more tokens> "This is culture"> Rugs 2500 holders (potentially new base network users)

让我直接>基本推文在其主帐户上的代币>前三名持有人的供应量的47％（卖了很多）>杰西（Jesse

Base automatically received 10 million tokens, equal to 1% of the total supply, for being the post creator via Zora’s protocol. However, a Base spokesperson confirmed to Decrypt that none of these tokens were sold and maintained that the asset was never an official Base project. The webpage disclaimer was cited as evidence.

Base通过Zora的协议自动获得了1000万个令牌，等于总供应量的1％。但是，基本发言人确认解密这些代币都没有出售并坚持认为资产从来不是正式的基础项目。网页免责声明被认为是证据。

Despite the chaos, the token has generated over $28 million in trading volume and more than $60,000 in creator earnings for Base, which is backed by Coinbase, showcasing the economic potential of onchain content, if not without risk.

尽管存在混乱，但代币仍产生了超过2800万美元的交易量和超过60,000美元的基本创造者收益，而基本的收益得到了Coinbase的支持，展示了OnChain含量的经济潜力，即使没有风险。

Coinbase Explains Content Coins vs Meme Coins

Coinbase解释内容硬币与模因硬币

As confusion reigned, Base founder Jesse Pollak stepped in to offer context, positioning the event as part of a larger shift in internet monetization. In a post on X, Pollak drew a distinction between “content coins” and meme coins.

在混乱的统治时期，基础创始人杰西·波拉克（Jesse Pollak）介入了背景，将活动定位为互联网货币化更大变化的一部分。在X上的帖子中，Pollak在“内容硬币”和Meme硬币之间进行了区分。

my quick takes – caveated with the reality that all my thinking on this is evolving + maturing in real time.—What makes a content coin a content coin? if it represents a single piece of content and it's created in a context where the expectation is set that the coin is the…

我的快速采取的态度 - 对我对此的所有思考的实时发展 +成熟的现实。如果它代表一块内容，并且是在设定硬币为…的上下文中创建的。

“Content coins represent a single piece of content, with singular value and no expectations,” Pollak wrote. “Meme coins, by contrast, are collections of content that carry high expectations.”

Pollak写道：“内容硬币代表了一块内容，具有奇异的价值，没有期望。” “相比之下，模因硬币是具有很高期望的内容的集合。”

Pollak encouraged followers to read an essay by Jacob Horne, co-founder of Zora, that articulates the philosophical foundation of content coins. In the piece, Horne argues that the internet is trapped between free access to information and the need to compensate creators. Crypto,

Pollak鼓励追随者阅读Zora联合创始人Jacob Horne的一篇文章，该论文阐明了内容硬币的哲学基础。在文章中，霍恩认为，互联网被困在免费获取信息和补偿创作者的需求之间。加密，