Coinbase的第2層網絡基礎，引發了高辛烷值的交易瘋狂

Coinbase的第2層網絡Base在發表有關分散的鏈上媒體協議Zora的帖子後，本週引發了高辛烷值交易的瘋狂。

Coinbase’s Layer 2 network, Base, is cooking up a high-octane trading frenzy this week with a post on Zora, a decentralized on-chain media protocol. The post, titled “Base is for everyone,” was instantly minted into a tradable ERC-20 token through Zora’s content-to-coin infrastructure, quickly gaining viral traction across crypto Twitter.

Coinbase的第2層網絡Base，本周正在烹飪高辛烷值交易狂潮，並在分散的鏈上媒體協議Zora上發表了一篇文章。該帖子的標題為“基礎是每個人”，通過Zora的內容到Coin基礎架構，立即被鑄造成可交易的ERC-20代幣，在Crypto Twitter上迅速獲得了病毒牽引力。

Base is for everyone. pic.twitter.com/gq3lLLuXO1

基礎適合所有人。 pic.twitter.com/gq3llluxo1

Base’s official X (formerly Twitter) account shared the post, which triggered an automatic token mint on Zora. Despite the Zora page prominently displaying a disclaimer that the asset was not an official Base token, that didn’t stop traders from piling in.

Base的官方X（以前是Twitter）帳戶分享了該帖子，該帖子觸發了Zora上的自動令牌薄荷。儘管Zora頁面突出顯示了免責聲明，即資產不是正式的基礎令牌，但這並沒有阻止交易者堆積。

Within hours, the token’s valuation exploded to $13 million, fueled by speculation and a fear of missing out. But just as quickly as it rose, the token crashed, losing 92% of its value and dropping to a market cap of $1 million within three hours. The frenzy highlighted just how powerful Coinbase’s broader ecosystem influence can be even without direct involvement.

在幾個小時之內，令牌的估值爆炸至1300萬美元，這是由於猜測和害怕錯過的刺激。但是隨著它上升的速度，代幣崩潰了，損失了其價值的92％，並在三個小時內下降到100萬美元的市值。瘋狂的表明，即使沒有直接參與，也可以強大的Coinbase更廣泛的生態系統影響力。

As of the latest data from DEXScreener, the token has rebounded slightly, gaining 20% in the last hour to trade around $0.007. The wild swings have drawn both criticism and intrigue, with many in the crypto community debating whether this was a case of irresponsible hype or a bold experiment in onchain content creation.

從DexScreener的最新數據開始，令牌略有反彈，在最後一個小時內獲得了20％的股份，交易約為0.007美元。狂野的波動引起了批評和陰謀，在加密貨幣社區中，許多人在辯論這是不負責任的炒作的情況，還是對OnChain Content Creation的大膽實驗。

Coinbase Explains Onchain Experiment with Zora

Coinbase解釋了Zora的OnChain實驗

Later in the evening, Base responded publicly, clarifying its intentions behind using Zora and emphasizing the value of experimenting in public.

傍晚，基地公開回應，澄清了其使用Zora背後的意圖，並強調了在公共場合進行實驗的價值。

“Base is posting on Zora because we believe everyone should bring their content onchain, and use the tools that make it possible,” the account posted on X. “If we want the future to be onchain, we have to be willing to experiment in public. That’s what we’re doing.”

X上發布的帳戶：“基地在Zora上發布Zora，因為我們相信每個人都應該將其內容帶到OnChain上，並使用使其成為可能的工具。

Base is posting on Zora because we believe everyone should bring their content onchain, and use the tools that make it possible.Memes. Moments. Culture.If we want the future to be onchain, we have to be willing to experiment in public. That’s what we’re doing. To be clear,…

Base發佈在Zora上，因為我們相信每個人都應該將其內容on Chain帶來，並使用使其成為可能的工具。時刻。文化。如果我們希望未來成為鏈，我們必須願意在公開場合進行試驗。那就是我們正在做的。要清楚，…

Zora itself replied with a cryptic message: “study Zora.” The protocol also retweeted pseudonymous user Larp von Trier, who summed up the situation with sharp sarcasm:

Zora本身回答了一個隱秘的信息：“研究Zora。”該協議還轉發了偽用戶Larp von Trier，他以尖銳的諷刺總結了這種情況：

Solana Manlets had no idea about how Zora works and got rekt.

Solana Manlets不知道Zora的工作原理並獲得了Rekt。

Not everyone was amused. Hantao Yuan, co-founder of the quest-to-earn platform Moku, raised red flags over the token’s distribution. According to Yuan, the top three wallets had a combined 47% of the supply, with one wallet alone controlling 25.6%. He also alleged that automated trading bots were manipulating the token chart and suggested that up to 2,500 wallets, potentially new users on the Base network, were rugged in the process.

並不是每個人都很開心。 Quest-to-to-to-to-Earn Platform Moku的聯合創始人Hantao Yuan在代幣的發行版中提出了危險信號。根據Yuan的說法，前三個錢包的總供應量的47％，僅一個錢包控制了25.6％。他還聲稱，自動交易機器人正在操縱令牌圖表，並建議在此過程中加強了多達2500個錢包，可能是基本網絡上的新用戶。

Let me get this straight> base tweets a token on their main account> Top 3 holders had 47% of the supply (sold a lot)> Jesse defends it> Posts 2 more tokens> "This is culture"> Rugs 2500 holders (potentially new base network users)

讓我直接>基本推文在其主帳戶上的代幣>前三名持有人的供應量的47％（賣了很多）>傑西（Jesse

Base automatically received 10 million tokens, equal to 1% of the total supply, for being the post creator via Zora’s protocol. However, a Base spokesperson confirmed to Decrypt that none of these tokens were sold and maintained that the asset was never an official Base project. The webpage disclaimer was cited as evidence.

Base通過Zora的協議自動獲得了1000萬個令牌，等於總供應量的1％。但是，基本發言人確認解密這些代幣都沒有出售並堅持認為資產從來不是正式的基礎項目。網頁免責聲明被認為是證據。

Despite the chaos, the token has generated over $28 million in trading volume and more than $60,000 in creator earnings for Base, which is backed by Coinbase, showcasing the economic potential of onchain content, if not without risk.

儘管存在混亂，但代幣仍產生了超過2800萬美元的交易量和超過60,000美元的基本創造者收益，而基本的收益得到了Coinbase的支持，展示了OnChain含量的經濟潛力，即使沒有風險。

Coinbase Explains Content Coins vs Meme Coins

Coinbase解釋內容硬幣與模因硬幣

As confusion reigned, Base founder Jesse Pollak stepped in to offer context, positioning the event as part of a larger shift in internet monetization. In a post on X, Pollak drew a distinction between “content coins” and meme coins.

在混亂的統治時期，基礎創始人傑西·波拉克（Jesse Pollak）介入了背景，將活動定位為互聯網貨幣化更大變化的一部分。在X上的帖子中，Pollak在“內容硬幣”和Meme硬幣之間進行了區分。

my quick takes – caveated with the reality that all my thinking on this is evolving + maturing in real time.—What makes a content coin a content coin? if it represents a single piece of content and it's created in a context where the expectation is set that the coin is the…

我的快速採取的態度 - 對我對此的所有思考的實時發展 +成熟的現實。如果它代表一塊內容，並且是在設定硬幣為…的上下文中創建的。

“Content coins represent a single piece of content, with singular value and no expectations,” Pollak wrote. “Meme coins, by contrast, are collections of content that carry high expectations.”

Pollak寫道：“內容硬幣代表了一塊內容，具有奇異的價值，沒有期望。” “相比之下，模因硬幣是具有很高期望的內容的集合。”

Pollak encouraged followers to read an essay by Jacob Horne, co-founder of Zora, that articulates the philosophical foundation of content coins. In the piece, Horne argues that the internet is trapped between free access to information and the need to compensate creators. Crypto,

Pollak鼓勵追隨者閱讀Zora聯合創始人Jacob Horne的一篇文章，該論文闡明了內容硬幣的哲學基礎。在文章中，霍恩認為，互聯網被困在免費獲取信息和補償創作者的需求之間。加密，