賴特因比特幣核心訴訟面臨藐視法庭案

澳洲電腦科學家、自稱比特幣發明者的克雷格懷特 (Craig Wright) 因對 BTC Core 開發者提起訴訟而面臨藐視法庭案件

Australian computer scientist Craig Wright, who has been engaged in a legal battle over the authorship of Bitcoin, now faces a contempt of court case over his lawsuit against BTC Core developers and Jack Dorsey's Square.

澳洲電腦科學家克雷格·賴特 (Craig Wright) 一直在就比特幣的版權問題進行法律鬥爭，現在他因對 BTC Core 開發人員和 Jack Dorsey’s Square 的訴訟而面臨藐視法庭案件。

The application, filed by the Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance (COPA), argues that Wright breached the injunction resulting from the main Bitcoin authorship trial, as reported by Bitcoinist.

根據 Bitcoinist 報導，該申請由加密貨幣開放專利聯盟（COPA）提交，認為賴特違反了主要比特幣作者審判所產生的禁令。

In that trial, British High Court Judge James Mellor ruled against Wright's claims of being Bitcoin's creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, earlier this year. The Judge concluded that the Australian computer scientist had “extensively and repeatedly” lied in his written and oral evidence and forged documents on a grand scale to sustain his claims.

在那次審判中，英國高等法院法官詹姆斯梅勒今年稍早駁回了賴特關於比特幣創造者中本聰的說法。法官得出的結論是，這位澳洲電腦科學家在他的書面和口頭證據中「廣泛且多次」撒謊，並大規模偽造文件來支持他的主張。

As a consequence, the court ordered Wright to admit he was not Satoshi Nakamoto and cease any further legal action related to his disproved authorship claims.

因此，法院命令賴特承認他不是中本聰，並停止與他被駁斥的作者身份主張相關的任何進一步的法律行動。

According to the court hearing transcription shared by BitMEX Research, the application form argues that Wright breached the Court's previous ruling after threatening to bring Precluded Proceedings and eventually doing so against Bitcoin Core and Square.

根據 BitMEX Research 分享的法庭聽證會記錄，申請表認為，賴特威脅要提起排除訴訟，並最終針對 Bitcoin Core 和 Square 這樣做，違反了法院先前的裁決。

The self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto filed a lawsuit on October 10, claiming that BTC Core developers and “all affiliated parties” have misrepresented BTC as the original Bitcoin.

自稱中本聰的人於 10 月 10 日提起訴訟，聲稱 BTC Core 開發者和「所有關聯方」將 BTC 歪曲為原始比特幣。

Wright, who is representing himself in this lawsuit, argues that the Taproot and Segregated Witness (SegWit) upgrades “have caused confusion in the market and have compromised the vision of the original Bitcoin protocol.”

賴特在這起訴訟中代表自己，他認為 Taproot 和隔離見證 (SegWit) 升級「造成了市場混亂，並損害了原始比特幣協議的願景」。

Moreover, the computer scientist claims Bitcoin SV (BSV) is the real version of the flagship cryptocurrency and requested over $1 billion in damages for undermining the asset and creating a misperception.

此外，這位電腦科學家聲稱比特幣 SV (BSV) 是旗艦加密貨幣的真實版本，並因破壞該資產並造成誤解而要求賠償超過 10 億美元。

During today’s hearing, Wright, who attended via video call from Singapore, refuted the accusation, stating, “I do not believe I am in contempt, my lord.” He added that if the court found him in contempt, he would be willing to amend the case as he didn't wish to be in breach.

在今天的聽證會上，賴特從新加坡通過視訊電話出席，駁斥了這一指控，並表示：“法官大人，我不認為我藐視法庭。”他補充說，如果法庭認定他藐視法庭，他願意修改案件，因為他不希望違法。

Previously, Wright explained on an X thread that he did not start his latest legal battle as Satoshi “but as someone who invested significantly in the system.” The computer scientist argues that his new claim is “fundamentally different” from an identity claim since it is based on his “contributions to the development, maintenance, and extension of the Bitcoin blockchain.”

此前，賴特在 X 帖子上解釋說，他並不是以中本聰「而是以對系統進行大量投資的人」的身份開始了最近的法律訴訟。這位計算機科學家認為，他的新主張與身份主張“根本不同”，因為它是基於他“對比特幣區塊鏈的開發、維護和擴展的貢獻”。

Judge Mellor decided to halt Wright’s lawsuit while the contempt application was resolved and scheduled the correspondent hearing for December 18. However, Wright initially opposed making a physical appearance in court that day, claiming that his autism spectrum disorder (ASD) would prevent him from physically being in court.

梅勒法官決定在藐視法庭申請得到解決期間中止賴特的訴訟，並將相應聽證會安排在12 月18 日。妨礙他在身體上出庭。

In response, COPA's legal representative, Jonathan Hough, argued that the seriousness of the allegation requires all parties to be in court, stating, “This is an application for committal. It is an extremely serious judicial proceeding. Therefore, we think it should take place in person.”

對此，COPA 的法律代表喬納森·霍夫 (Jonathan Hough) 辯稱，指控的嚴重性需要所有各方出庭，並表示：「這是一份拘押申請。這是一個極為嚴肅的司法程序。因此，我們認為這應該親自進行。

“CSW has brought a very large claim, if there is any merit in COPA's application, it is wrong in principle to hide behind a keyboard from a closet in Thailand. CSW says he is a UK resident and should be expected to return to the UK for the hearing,” Hough added.

「CSW 提出了一項非常大的索賠，如果 COPA 的申請有任何優點的話，那麼在泰國躲在鍵盤後面是原則上錯誤的。 CSW 表示，他是英國居民，應該會返回英國參加聽證會。

Finally, Judge Mellor set an additional direction hearing date for November 26 to determine whether Wright will be present in court next month.

最後，梅勒法官將額外的指示聽證會日期定為 11 月 26 日，以確定賴特是否會在下個月出庭。