TRON 基金會和孫宇晨尋求駁回 SEC 管轄權糾紛訴訟

TRON 基金會和孫宇晨已提出駁回 SEC 提起的訴訟，認為 SEC 對外國被告缺乏管轄權。被告認為，SEC 對未註冊證券銷售、詐欺和市場操縱的指控過分，超出了其在全球數位資產市場的監管權限。

TRON Foundation, Justin Sun Seek Dismissal of SEC Lawsuit Amidst Jurisdiction Dispute

TRON 基金會、孫宇晨因管轄權糾紛尋求駁回 SEC 訴訟

New York, NY, March 23, 2023 - The TRON Foundation, alongside its founder Justin Sun, has filed a motion to dismiss an ongoing legal battle with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The defendants argue that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over their actions and that the agency is exceeding its regulatory authority.

紐約州紐約，2023 年 3 月 23 日 - TRON 基金會及其創始人孫宇晨 (Justin Sun) 已提交動議，駁回與美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 正在進行的法律訴訟。被告辯稱，美國證券交易委員會對其行為缺乏管轄權，該機構超越了其監管權限。

Background of the Case

案件背景

In March 2023, the SEC filed a civil enforcement action against Sun and TRON Foundation, alleging that the organization sold unregistered securities, engaged in fraud, and manipulated the market. The SEC contended that TRON's token, TRX, was an investment contract and therefore subject to U.S. securities laws.

2023年3月，SEC對Sun和TRON基金會提起民事執法訴訟，指控該組織出售未註冊證券、從事詐欺和操縱市場。 SEC 認為，TRON 的代幣 TRX 是一種投資合約，因此受美國證券法管轄。

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

被告駁回動議

In their motion to dismiss, the defendants argue that the SEC has not sufficiently demonstrated jurisdiction over their conduct. They contend that TRON's operations are predominantly conducted outside the United States and that the SEC is attempting to extend its authority beyond its territorial limits.

在駁回動議中，被告辯稱 SEC 沒有充分證明對其行為具有管轄權。他們認為，TRON 的業務主要在美國境外進行，而 SEC 正試圖將其權力擴展到其領土範圍之外。

"The SEC is not a global regulatory authority," the defendants stated in their filing. "Its efforts to leverage very attenuated contacts with the United States, to extend US securities laws to predominantly foreign conduct, are excessive and must be rejected."

被告在文件中表示：“美國證券交易委員會不是全球監管機構。” “它利用與美國之間非常脆弱的聯繫，將美國證券法擴大到主要針對外國行為的努力是過度的，必須予以拒絕。”

Jurisdictional Challenges

管轄權挑戰

The defendants also invoked the doctrine of major questions, a legal principle that limits the government's ability to create new regulations without clear authorization from Congress. They argued that the SEC's attempt to regulate digital assets in the global market without explicit congressional authority constitutes an impermissible expansion of its power.

被告還援引了重大問題原則，這是一項限制政府在未經國會明確授權的情況下制定新法規的能力的法律原則。他們認為，美國證券交易委員會在沒有明確的國會授權的情況下試圖監管全球市場的數位資產，構成了其權力的不允許擴張。

Rainberry's Separate Stance

Rainberry的獨立立場

Rainberry, a California-based entity affiliated with TRON, took a different stance in its response to the SEC lawsuit. While Rainberry did not contest the SEC's jurisdiction, it requested dismissal on other grounds, including lack of proper notice of the alleged violations.

波場 TRON 旗下位於加州的 Rainberry 實體在回應 SEC 訴訟時採取了不同的立場。雖然 Rainberry 沒有對 SEC 的管轄權提出異議，但它以其他理由請求駁回，包括缺乏對涉嫌違規行為的適當通知。

Complexities of Digital Asset Regulation

數位資產監管的複雜性

The legal battle between TRON Foundation, Justin Sun, and the SEC highlights the complexities and challenges of regulating digital assets in a global environment. Regulatory agencies, such as the SEC, are seeking to assert their authority over emerging technologies and markets, but clashes over jurisdiction, interpretation of laws, and principles of fairness are becoming increasingly common.

TRON 基金會、孫宇晨和 SEC 之間的法律鬥爭凸顯了在全球環境下監管數位資產的複雜性和挑戰。美國證券交易委員會等監管機構正在尋求維護其對新興技術和市場的權威，但管轄權、法律解釋和公平原則的衝突正變得越來越普遍。

Precedence for Cryptocurrency Regulation

加密貨幣監管的優先順序

The outcome of this case will have significant implications not only for the TRON ecosystem but also for the broader cryptocurrency sector. It will serve as a precedent for the regulation of digital assets worldwide and could shape how regulatory agencies approach enforcement actions in this rapidly evolving landscape.

此案的結果不僅對 TRON 生態系統而且對更廣泛的加密貨幣領域都將產生重大影響。它將成為全球數位資產監管的先例，並可能影響監管機構在這個快速發展的環境中採取執法行動的方式。

Regulatory Framework and Stakeholder Impact

監管框架和利害關係人的影響

Stakeholders in the digital asset industry will closely monitor the proceedings in this case, recognizing its potential impact on regulatory frameworks, investor protection, and the wider adoption of blockchain technology. The resolution of this legal battle will ultimately shape the future trajectory of digital asset regulation and influence how regulatory agencies enforce regulations in the ever-changing world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain innovation.

數位資產產業的利害關係人將密切關注本案的進展，並認識到其對監管框架、投資者保護和區塊鏈技術更廣泛採用的潛在影響。這場法律戰的解決最終將塑造數位資產監管的未來軌跡，並影響監管機構在不斷變化的加密貨幣和區塊鏈創新世界中執行監管的方式。