TRON 基金会和孙宇晨寻求驳回 SEC 管辖权纠纷诉讼

TRON 基金会和孙宇晨已提出驳回 SEC 提起的诉讼，认为 SEC 对外国被告缺乏管辖权。被告认为，SEC 对未注册证券销售、欺诈和市场操纵的指控过分，超出了其在全球数字资产市场的监管权限。

TRON Foundation, Justin Sun Seek Dismissal of SEC Lawsuit Amidst Jurisdiction Dispute

TRON 基金会、孙宇晨因管辖权纠纷寻求驳回 SEC 诉讼

New York, NY, March 23, 2023 - The TRON Foundation, alongside its founder Justin Sun, has filed a motion to dismiss an ongoing legal battle with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The defendants argue that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over their actions and that the agency is exceeding its regulatory authority.

纽约州纽约，2023 年 3 月 23 日 - TRON 基金会及其创始人孙宇晨 (Justin Sun) 已提交动议，驳回与美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 正在进行的法律诉讼。被告辩称，美国证券交易委员会对其行为缺乏管辖权，并且该机构超越了其监管权限。

Background of the Case

案件背景

In March 2023, the SEC filed a civil enforcement action against Sun and TRON Foundation, alleging that the organization sold unregistered securities, engaged in fraud, and manipulated the market. The SEC contended that TRON's token, TRX, was an investment contract and therefore subject to U.S. securities laws.

2023年3月，SEC对Sun和TRON基金会提起民事执法诉讼，指控该组织出售未注册证券、从事欺诈和操纵市场。 SEC 认为，TRON 的代币 TRX 是一种投资合约，因此受美国证券法管辖。

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

被告驳回动议

In their motion to dismiss, the defendants argue that the SEC has not sufficiently demonstrated jurisdiction over their conduct. They contend that TRON's operations are predominantly conducted outside the United States and that the SEC is attempting to extend its authority beyond its territorial limits.

在驳回动议中，被告辩称 SEC 没有充分证明对其行为具有管辖权。他们认为，TRON 的业务主要在美国境外进行，而 SEC 正试图将其权力扩展到其领土范围之外。

"The SEC is not a global regulatory authority," the defendants stated in their filing. "Its efforts to leverage very attenuated contacts with the United States, to extend US securities laws to predominantly foreign conduct, are excessive and must be rejected."

被告在文件中表示：“美国证券交易委员会不是全球监管机构。” “它利用与美国之间非常脆弱的联系，将美国证券法扩大到主要针对外国行为的努力是过度的，必须予以拒绝。”

Jurisdictional Challenges

管辖权挑战

The defendants also invoked the doctrine of major questions, a legal principle that limits the government's ability to create new regulations without clear authorization from Congress. They argued that the SEC's attempt to regulate digital assets in the global market without explicit congressional authority constitutes an impermissible expansion of its power.

被告还援引了重大问题原则，这是一项限制政府在未经国会明确授权的情况下制定新法规的能力的法律原则。他们认为，美国证券交易委员会在没有明确的国会授权的情况下试图监管全球市场的数字资产，构成了其权力的不允许扩张。

Rainberry's Separate Stance

Rainberry的独立立场

Rainberry, a California-based entity affiliated with TRON, took a different stance in its response to the SEC lawsuit. While Rainberry did not contest the SEC's jurisdiction, it requested dismissal on other grounds, including lack of proper notice of the alleged violations.

波场 TRON 旗下位于加州的 Rainberry 实体在回应 SEC 诉讼时采取了不同的立场。虽然 Rainberry 没有对 SEC 的管辖权提出异议，但它以其他理由请求驳回，包括缺乏对涉嫌违规行为的适当通知。

Complexities of Digital Asset Regulation

数字资产监管的复杂性

The legal battle between TRON Foundation, Justin Sun, and the SEC highlights the complexities and challenges of regulating digital assets in a global environment. Regulatory agencies, such as the SEC, are seeking to assert their authority over emerging technologies and markets, but clashes over jurisdiction, interpretation of laws, and principles of fairness are becoming increasingly common.

TRON 基金会、孙宇晨和 SEC 之间的法律斗争凸显了在全球环境下监管数字资产的复杂性和挑战。美国证券交易委员会等监管机构正在寻求维护其对新兴技术和市场的权威，但管辖权、法律解释和公平原则方面的冲突正变得越来越普遍。

Precedence for Cryptocurrency Regulation

加密货币监管的优先顺序

The outcome of this case will have significant implications not only for the TRON ecosystem but also for the broader cryptocurrency sector. It will serve as a precedent for the regulation of digital assets worldwide and could shape how regulatory agencies approach enforcement actions in this rapidly evolving landscape.

此案的结果不仅对 TRON 生态系统而且对更广泛的加密货币领域都将产生重大影响。它将成为全球数字资产监管的先例，并可能影响监管机构在这个快速发展的环境中采取执法行动的方式。

Regulatory Framework and Stakeholder Impact

监管框架和利益相关者的影响

Stakeholders in the digital asset industry will closely monitor the proceedings in this case, recognizing its potential impact on regulatory frameworks, investor protection, and the wider adoption of blockchain technology. The resolution of this legal battle will ultimately shape the future trajectory of digital asset regulation and influence how regulatory agencies enforce regulations in the ever-changing world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain innovation.

数字资产行业的利益相关者将密切关注本案的进展，认识到其对监管框架、投资者保护和区块链技术更广泛采用的潜在影响。这场法律战的解决最终将塑造数字资产监管的未来轨迹，并影响监管机构在不断变化的加密货币和区块链创新世界中执行监管的方式。