bitcoin
bitcoin

$92741.608008 USD

-0.61%

ethereum
ethereum

$3353.932776 USD

0.24%

tether
tether

$0.998239 USD

0.02%

xrp
xrp

$2.069613 USD

-1.19%

bnb
bnb

$702.163500 USD

1.39%

solana
solana

$190.801317 USD

0.63%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.313400 USD

-0.10%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999908 USD

0.00%

cardano
cardano

$0.857057 USD

-0.05%

tron
tron

$0.252531 USD

-1.77%

avalanche
avalanche

$35.970118 USD

0.81%

toncoin
toncoin

$5.578192 USD

-0.51%

chainlink
chainlink

$20.521139 USD

-1.75%

shiba-inu
shiba-inu

$0.000021 USD

-1.59%

sui
sui

$4.168856 USD

2.25%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

TRON Foundation and Justin Sun Seek Dismissal of SEC Lawsuit in Jurisdiction Dispute

Apr 02, 2024 at 08:50 pm

The TRON Foundation and Justin Sun have filed to dismiss a case brought by the SEC, arguing that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over foreign defendants. The defendants maintain that the SEC's claims of unregistered security sales, fraud, and market manipulation are excessive and exceed its regulatory authority in the global digital asset market.

TRON Foundation and Justin Sun Seek Dismissal of SEC Lawsuit in Jurisdiction Dispute

TRON Foundation, Justin Sun Seek Dismissal of SEC Lawsuit Amidst Jurisdiction Dispute

New York, NY, March 23, 2023 - The TRON Foundation, alongside its founder Justin Sun, has filed a motion to dismiss an ongoing legal battle with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The defendants argue that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over their actions and that the agency is exceeding its regulatory authority.

Background of the Case

In March 2023, the SEC filed a civil enforcement action against Sun and TRON Foundation, alleging that the organization sold unregistered securities, engaged in fraud, and manipulated the market. The SEC contended that TRON's token, TRX, was an investment contract and therefore subject to U.S. securities laws.

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

In their motion to dismiss, the defendants argue that the SEC has not sufficiently demonstrated jurisdiction over their conduct. They contend that TRON's operations are predominantly conducted outside the United States and that the SEC is attempting to extend its authority beyond its territorial limits.

"The SEC is not a global regulatory authority," the defendants stated in their filing. "Its efforts to leverage very attenuated contacts with the United States, to extend US securities laws to predominantly foreign conduct, are excessive and must be rejected."

Jurisdictional Challenges

The defendants also invoked the doctrine of major questions, a legal principle that limits the government's ability to create new regulations without clear authorization from Congress. They argued that the SEC's attempt to regulate digital assets in the global market without explicit congressional authority constitutes an impermissible expansion of its power.

Rainberry's Separate Stance

Rainberry, a California-based entity affiliated with TRON, took a different stance in its response to the SEC lawsuit. While Rainberry did not contest the SEC's jurisdiction, it requested dismissal on other grounds, including lack of proper notice of the alleged violations.

Complexities of Digital Asset Regulation

The legal battle between TRON Foundation, Justin Sun, and the SEC highlights the complexities and challenges of regulating digital assets in a global environment. Regulatory agencies, such as the SEC, are seeking to assert their authority over emerging technologies and markets, but clashes over jurisdiction, interpretation of laws, and principles of fairness are becoming increasingly common.

Precedence for Cryptocurrency Regulation

The outcome of this case will have significant implications not only for the TRON ecosystem but also for the broader cryptocurrency sector. It will serve as a precedent for the regulation of digital assets worldwide and could shape how regulatory agencies approach enforcement actions in this rapidly evolving landscape.

Regulatory Framework and Stakeholder Impact

Stakeholders in the digital asset industry will closely monitor the proceedings in this case, recognizing its potential impact on regulatory frameworks, investor protection, and the wider adoption of blockchain technology. The resolution of this legal battle will ultimately shape the future trajectory of digital asset regulation and influence how regulatory agencies enforce regulations in the ever-changing world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain innovation.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Dec 31, 2024