Tron 基金會提出動議，要求美國證券交易委員會駁回訴訟，稱該機構「不是全球監管機構」 - The Daily Hodl

Tron Foundation and other firms associated with Tron (TRX) founder Justin Sun are asking a judge to dismiss the lawsuit lodged against them by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Tron 基金會和其他與 Tron (TRX) 創始人孫宇晨相關的公司正在請求法官駁回美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 對他們提起的訴訟。

In a motion filed late last month, lawyers for Tron say that the SEC is going beyond its jurisdiction when it moved to regulate foreign entities and individuals.

在上個月末提交的動議中，Tron 的律師表示，美國證券交易委員會在監管外國實體和個人時超出了其管轄範圍。

“The SEC is not a worldwide regulator. Its efforts to leverage highly attenuated contacts to the United States, to extend US securities laws to cover predominantly foreign conduct, go too far and should be rejected.”

「美國證券交易委員會不是一個全球性的監管機構。它試圖利用與美國高度削弱的聯繫，將美國證券法擴大到涵蓋主要是外國的行為，這種做法太過分了，應該被拒絕。”

In March 2023, the SEC sued Tron Foundation, Justin Sun, BitTorrent Foundation and Rainberry Inc (formerly known as BitTorrent) on allegations that the defendants offered and sold unregistered crypto securities, namely TRX and BitTorrent (BTT).

2023 年 3 月，SEC 起訴 Tron 基金會、孫宇晨、BitTorrent 基金會和 Rainberry Inc（前身為 BitTorrent），指控被告提供和出售未經註冊的加密證券，即 TRX 和 BitTorrent (BTT)。

The SEC also accused Sun and his firms of fraudulent manipulation of TRX’s secondary market by engaging in “extensive wash trading”.

SEC 還指控 Sun 及其公司透過進行「大量清洗交易」來欺詐性操縱 TRX 二級市場。

Lawyers for Sun and his firms now contend that the initial coin offering of TRX and the initial exchange offering of BTT are “out of the SEC’s regulatory reach,” but that hasn’t stopped the US markets regulator from pursuing the defendants.

Sun 及其公司的律師現在辯稱，TRX 的首次代幣發行和 BTT 的首次交易所發行“超出了 SEC 的監管範圍”，但這並沒有阻止美國市場監管機構追查被告。

“Undeterred, the SEC seeks to haul the foreign defendants to this Court nonetheless, asserting that later secondary sales on a U.S.-based platform serving users worldwide, and global social media contests, and airdrops of those same digital assets, somehow were ‘unregistered US securities offerings,’ even though the connection to the US forum in each instance is tenuous at best. The remaining claims suffer similar jurisdictional defects.”

「儘管如此，美國證券交易委員會並沒有被嚇倒，仍試圖將外國被告拖上法庭，聲稱後來在一個為全球用戶提供服務的美國平台上進行的二次銷售、全球社交媒體競賽以及這些相同數字資產的空投，在某種程度上是'未經註冊的美國'”證券發行”，儘管在每種情況下與美國論壇的聯繫充其量都是微弱的。其餘索賠也存在類似的司法缺陷。”

According to Tron Foundation, the SEC’s actions could have a negative impact across the globe.

根據 Tron 基金會的說法，美國證券交易委員會的行為可能會在全球範圍內產生負面影響。

“Without a clear regulatory regime that details when a token is a security, how token creators can comply if they offer securities, and how foreign actors in the space fit in the picture, the SEC’s regulatory expansion risks destabilizing the entire global digital asset market. At present, no project and no jurisdiction is safe from the SEC’s ever-broadening campaign against digital assets. Thus, to the extent the SEC has stated a viable claim (and it has not), the Court should dismiss this case under the major questions doctrine.”

「如果沒有明確的監管制度來詳細說明代幣何時是證券、代幣創建者在提供證券時如何遵守規定，以及該領域的外國參與者如何融入其中，美國證券交易委員會的監管擴張可能會破壞整個全球數位資產市場的穩定。目前，沒有任何項目和司法管轄區能夠免受美國證券交易委員會不斷擴大的針對數位資產的打擊行動的影響。因此，只要 SEC 提出了可行的主張（事實並非如此），法院就應根據​​重大問題原則駁回此案。”

Generated Image: Midjourney

不要錯過任何一個節拍 – 訂閱即可將電子郵件提醒直接發送到您的收件匣 查看價格行動 在 Twitter、Facebook 和 Telegram 上關注我們 瀏覽 The Daily Hodl Mix 生成的圖片：Midjourney