SushiSwap 的 Buru No Shinka 提案引發軒然大波和投票操縱指控

SushiSwap 提出的實驗室模型引發了爭議，前貢獻者指控 FUD 和錯誤訊息。該提案旨在透過將 Sushi Labs 創建為一家負責產品管理和開發的自主公司來重組 Sushi、提高效率並加速發展。然而，人們對 Sushi Labs 團隊涉嫌操縱投票、向實驗室分配 2500 萬個 Sushi 代幣以及可能減少有利於 Sushi Labs 的 DAO 權力等問題產生了擔憂。 SushiSwap 的主廚 Jared Grey 為該提案進行了辯護，稱這將提高治理效率，並不是「DAO 的終結」。

SushiSwap's Burū No Shinka Proposal Stirs Controversy

SushiSwap 的 Burū No Shinka 提案引發爭議

Amidst an ongoing debate within the SushiSwap community, the protocol's head chef, Jared Grey, has attributed the controversy surrounding the proposed Burū No Shinka transition to a Labs model primarily to "former contributors who like to propagate endless FUD and misinformation."

在 SushiSwap 社區內持續不斷的爭論中，該協議的主廚 Jared Grey 將圍繞 Burū No Shinka 向 Labs 模型過渡的提議的爭議主要歸因於“喜歡傳播無休止的 FUD 和錯誤信息的前貢獻者”。

The Contentious Proposal

有爭議的提案

On March 26, a proposal titled "Evolving Sushi—Burū no Shinka" was introduced, aiming to restructure SushiSwap's current organizational structure by adopting a Labs model. The proposal highlights the need for greater flexibility in governance procedures to enhance development pace.

3月26日，一項名為「進化壽司－Burū no Shinka」的提案被提出，旨在透過採用Labs模式來重組SushiSwap目前的組織結構。該提案強調了治理程序需要更大的靈活性，以加快發展步伐。

Accordingly, it suggests establishing Sushi Labs as an autonomous administrative, technical, and operational entity responsible for product development and management within the Sushi ecosystem.

因此，它建議將 Sushi Labs 建立為一個自治的管理、技術和營運實體，負責 Sushi 生態系統內的產品開發和管理。

Community Concerns

社區關注

The proposal has sparked heated discussions among community members due to proposed changes that empower Sushi Labs while potentially limiting the DAO's decentralized on-chain governance capabilities, including token allocation voting.

該提案引發了社區成員的熱烈討論，因為擬議的變更賦予了 Sushi Labs 權力，但同時可能限制了 DAO 的去中心化鏈上治理能力，包括代幣分配投票。

Furthermore, the proposal allocates 25 million Sushi tokens and other funds to Sushi Labs, making it the exclusive beneficiary of future airdrops. This has raised concerns, as the amount in the treasury differs from the proposed figures.

此外，該提案還向 Sushi Labs 分配 2500 萬個 Sushi 代幣和其他資金，使其成為未來空投的唯一受益者。這引起了人們的擔憂，因為國庫中的金額與擬議的數字不同。

Allegations of Vote Manipulation and Hostile Takeover

投票操縱和惡意收購的指控

Naïm Boubziz, a former SushiSwap contributor, has raised allegations of potential vote manipulation by the Sushi Labs team, claiming that they might be using liquidity to vote in their favor. He has labeled SushiSwap's actions as a "hostile takeover."

SushiSwap 前貢獻者 Naïm Boubziz 提出了 Sushi Labs 團隊可能操縱投票的指控，聲稱他們可能利用流動性來投票支持他們。他將 SushiSwap 的行為稱為「敵意收購」。

SushiSwap's Response

SushiSwap 的回應

In response to the allegations, Grey has defended the proposal as a necessary upgrade to reduce friction and inefficiencies in the current DAO model. He dismissed the characterization of the proposal as an "End of DAO," stating:

針對這些指控，格雷為該提案辯護，稱其為減少目前 DAO 模型中的摩擦和低效率的必要升級。他駁斥了將該提案定性為「DAO 終結」的說法，並表示：

"Labeling it as the 'End of DAO' seems melodramatic when many view it as a needed upgrade... Still, you're entitled to your opinion, and sharing is encouraged."

“當許多人將其視為必要的升級時，將其標記為‘DAO 的終結’似乎有些誇張……不過，你有權發表自己的意見，並鼓勵分享。”

Grey has emphasized the streamlined governance that Burū No Shinka will bring to the Sushi DAO, eliminating the need for a head chef figurehead. He has outlined Sushi Labs' goal of fostering a multi-product-and-token ecosystem, remaining under the control of the governance council structure with increased on-chain and decentralized controls.

Gray 強調 Burū No Shinka 將為 Sushi DAO 帶來精簡的治理，從而消除對主廚傀儡的需要。他概述了 Sushi Labs 的目標，即培育多產品和代幣生態系統，並繼續受治理委員會結構的控制，增加鏈上和去中心化控制。

Regarding the alleged vote manipulation, Grey has debunked the claims, revealing that a whale purchased a significant amount of SUSHI tokens to disrupt the Sushi team's progress.

關於所謂的投票操縱行為，Gray 已經揭穿了這一說法，並透露鯨魚購買了大量 SUSHI 代幣來擾亂 Sushi 團隊的進展。

Conclusion

結論

The Burū No Shinka proposal has become a polarizing issue within the SushiSwap community, with varying perspectives on the potential implications for the protocol's governance and future development. The controversy highlights the delicate balance between centralized and decentralized decision-making in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).

Burū No Shinka 提案已成為 SushiSwap 社群內的一個兩極化的問題，對於該協議的治理和未來發展的潛在影響存在不同的觀點。這場爭議凸顯了去中心化自治組織（DAO）中中心化和去中心化決策之間的微妙平衡。

As the voting period for the proposal draws near, the community remains divided, with some anticipating an upgrade that will enhance efficiency, while others fear a shift toward centralization. The outcome of the vote will shape the future of SushiSwap and set a precedent for the evolution of governance models in the DeFi ecosystem.

隨著該提案投票期的臨近，社區仍然存在分歧，一些人預計升級將提高效率，而另一些人則擔心轉向中心化。投票結果將塑造 SushiSwap 的未來，並為 DeFi 生態系統治理模式的演進樹立先例。