SushiSwap 的 Buru No Shinka 提案引发轩然大波和投票操纵指控

SushiSwap 提出的实验室模型引发了争议，前贡献者指控 FUD 和错误信息。该提案旨在通过将 Sushi Labs 创建为一家负责产品管理和开发的自主公司来重组 Sushi、提高效率并加速发展。然而，人们对 Sushi Labs 团队涉嫌操纵投票、向实验室分配 2500 万个 Sushi 代币以及可能减少有利于 Sushi Labs 的 DAO 权力等问题产生了担忧。 SushiSwap 的主厨贾里德·格雷 (Jared Grey) 为该提案进行了辩护，称这将提高治理效率，并不是“DAO 的终结”。

SushiSwap's Burū No Shinka Proposal Stirs Controversy

SushiSwap 的 Burū No Shinka 提案引发争议

Amidst an ongoing debate within the SushiSwap community, the protocol's head chef, Jared Grey, has attributed the controversy surrounding the proposed Burū No Shinka transition to a Labs model primarily to "former contributors who like to propagate endless FUD and misinformation."

在 SushiSwap 社区内持续不断的争论中，该协议的主厨 Jared Grey 将围绕 Burū No Shinka 向 Labs 模型过渡的提议的争议主要归因于“喜欢传播无休止的 FUD 和错误信息的前贡献者”。

The Contentious Proposal

有争议的提案

On March 26, a proposal titled "Evolving Sushi—Burū no Shinka" was introduced, aiming to restructure SushiSwap's current organizational structure by adopting a Labs model. The proposal highlights the need for greater flexibility in governance procedures to enhance development pace.

3月26日，一项名为“进化寿司——Burū no Shinka”的提案被提出，旨在通过采用Labs模式来重组SushiSwap当前的组织结构。该提案强调了治理程序需要更大的灵活性，以加快发展步伐。

Accordingly, it suggests establishing Sushi Labs as an autonomous administrative, technical, and operational entity responsible for product development and management within the Sushi ecosystem.

因此，它建议将 Sushi Labs 建立为一个自治的管理、技术和运营实体，负责 Sushi 生态系统内的产品开发和管理。

Community Concerns

社区关注

The proposal has sparked heated discussions among community members due to proposed changes that empower Sushi Labs while potentially limiting the DAO's decentralized on-chain governance capabilities, including token allocation voting.

该提案引发了社区成员的热烈讨论，因为拟议的变更赋予了 Sushi Labs 权力，但同时可能限制了 DAO 的去中心化链上治理能力，包括代币分配投票。

Furthermore, the proposal allocates 25 million Sushi tokens and other funds to Sushi Labs, making it the exclusive beneficiary of future airdrops. This has raised concerns, as the amount in the treasury differs from the proposed figures.

此外，该提案还向 Sushi Labs 分配 2500 万个 Sushi 代币和其他资金，使其成为未来空投的唯一受益者。这引起了人们的担忧，因为国库中的数额与拟议的数字不同。

Allegations of Vote Manipulation and Hostile Takeover

投票操纵和恶意收购的指控

Naïm Boubziz, a former SushiSwap contributor, has raised allegations of potential vote manipulation by the Sushi Labs team, claiming that they might be using liquidity to vote in their favor. He has labeled SushiSwap's actions as a "hostile takeover."

SushiSwap 前贡献者 Naïm Boubziz 提出了 Sushi Labs 团队可能操纵投票的指控，声称他们可能利用流动性来投票支持他们。他将 SushiSwap 的行为称为“敌意收购”。

SushiSwap's Response

SushiSwap 的回应

In response to the allegations, Grey has defended the proposal as a necessary upgrade to reduce friction and inefficiencies in the current DAO model. He dismissed the characterization of the proposal as an "End of DAO," stating:

针对这些指控，格雷为该提案辩护，称其为减少当前 DAO 模型中的摩擦和低效率的必要升级。他驳斥了将该提案定性为“DAO 终结”的说法，并表示：

"Labeling it as the 'End of DAO' seems melodramatic when many view it as a needed upgrade... Still, you're entitled to your opinion, and sharing is encouraged."

“当许多人将其视为必要的升级时，将其标记为‘DAO 的终结’似乎有些夸张……不过，你有权发表自己的意见，并且鼓励分享。”

Grey has emphasized the streamlined governance that Burū No Shinka will bring to the Sushi DAO, eliminating the need for a head chef figurehead. He has outlined Sushi Labs' goal of fostering a multi-product-and-token ecosystem, remaining under the control of the governance council structure with increased on-chain and decentralized controls.

Gray 强调 Burū No Shinka 将为 Sushi DAO 带来精简的治理，从而消除对主厨傀儡的需要。他概述了 Sushi Labs 的目标，即培育多产品和代币生态系统，并继续受治理委员会结构的控制，增加链上和去中心化控制。

Regarding the alleged vote manipulation, Grey has debunked the claims, revealing that a whale purchased a significant amount of SUSHI tokens to disrupt the Sushi team's progress.

关于所谓的投票操纵行为，Gray 已经揭穿了这一说法，并透露鲸鱼购买了大量 SUSHI 代币来扰乱 Sushi 团队的进展。

Conclusion

结论

The Burū No Shinka proposal has become a polarizing issue within the SushiSwap community, with varying perspectives on the potential implications for the protocol's governance and future development. The controversy highlights the delicate balance between centralized and decentralized decision-making in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).

Burū No Shinka 提案已成为 SushiSwap 社区内的一个两极分化的问题，对于该协议的治理和未来发展的潜在影响存在不同的观点。这场争议凸显了去中心化自治组织（DAO）中中心化和去中心化决策之间的微妙平衡。

As the voting period for the proposal draws near, the community remains divided, with some anticipating an upgrade that will enhance efficiency, while others fear a shift toward centralization. The outcome of the vote will shape the future of SushiSwap and set a precedent for the evolution of governance models in the DeFi ecosystem.

随着该提案投票期的临近，社区仍然存在分歧，一些人预计升级将提高效率，而另一些人则担心转向中心化。投票结果将塑造 SushiSwap 的未来，并为 DeFi 生态系统治理模型的演变树立先例。