索拉納實驗室（Solana Labs）刪除提案，以降低每年授予Stakers的35億美元的代幣

在一場近距離戰鬥中，批評者說，削減將意味著剃須刀上存在的小驗證器將不再能夠獲利

On Thursday, Solana stakeholders rejected a proposal to lower the $3.5 billion in tokens granted to stakers each year.

週四，索拉納（Solana）利益相關者拒絕了一項提議，要求降低每年授予Stakers的35億美元的代幣。

Proposal SIMD-0228 sought to reduce the amount of Solana tokens awarded based on the total amount of tokens staked, and continue to cut the blockchain’s emissions by a flat 15% each year until hitting a base inflation rate of 1.5%.

提案SIMD-0228試圖根據固定的代幣數量減少授予的Solana代幣數量，並繼續每年將區塊鏈的排放量減少15％，直到達到1.5％的基本通貨膨脹率。

In a close fight, detractors said the cuts would mean small validators existing on razor thin margins would no longer be able to profit, and force them to shut down, which would harm Solana’s decentralisation. The sceptics won the vote.

在一場近距離戰鬥中，批評者表示，這些削減將意味著在剃須刀邊緣上存在的小驗證器將不再能夠獲利，並迫使他們關閉，這會損害索拉納的權力下放化。懷疑論者贏得了投票。

Validators run the software that processes transactions on the Solana blockchain.

驗證者運行在Solana區塊鏈上處理交易的軟件。

Despite the proposal’s failure, many in the Solana community are celebrating because the vote represents a historic moment in the network’s decentralised governance.

儘管該提議失敗了，但索拉納社區中的許多人都在慶祝，因為投票代表了該網絡分散的治理中的歷史性時刻。

“This was a major victory for the Solana ecosystem and its governance process,” Tushar Jain, co-founder of Multicoin Capital, a Solana investor, said online. He was one of the three people behind the proposal.

Solana Investor Multicoin Capital的聯合創始人Tushar Jain說：“這是Solana生態系統及其治理過程的重大勝利。”他是該提議背後的三個人之一。

Since its 2020 launch, Solana has rewarded stakers with lucrative token rewards. However, as the portion of rewards stakers earn from other sources, such as transaction tips, increases, many in the community have argued that native staking rewards should be lowered.

自2020年推出以來，索拉納（Solana）以有利可圖的代幣獎勵向Stakers獎勵。但是，隨著獎勵的一部分從其他來源賺取的獎勵，例如交易提示，增加，社區中的許多人認為，應降低本地放入獎勵。

Continuously issuing new tokens causes “long-term, continual downward price pressure,” Solana company Helius said in September.

Solana Company Helius在9月表示，不斷發行新的代幣會導致“長期，持續下降的價格壓力”。

Decentralised doubts

分散的懷疑

Solana has for a long time struggled to convince users that it is sufficiently decentralised — in other words, that a patchwork of token holders has the power to intervene in major decisions, and not just rich insiders.

索拉納（Solana）長期以來一直在努力說服用戶足夠分散的用戶 - 換句話說，象徵持有人的拼湊有權干預重大決策，而不僅僅是富有的內部人士。

There are reasons for them to be sceptical. The blockchain was launched by Solana Labs, a for-profit company. By contrast, Bitcoin, often viewed as the gold standard for crypto decentralisation, has no central authority or attached company.

他們有理由持懷疑態度。該區塊鍊是由營利性公司Solana Labs推出的。相比之下，比特幣經常被視為加密分散的黃金標準，沒有中央權力或附屬公司。

Additionally, a whopping 48% of Solana tokens were given to insiders or sold to venture capital firms when the blockchain launched, according to blockchain data platform Messari. Alameda Research, the sister company of fraudulent exchange FTX, was previously among the token’s biggest holders.

此外，據區塊鏈數據平台Messari稱，在區塊鏈推出時，將高達48％的Solana代幣送給了內部人士或出售給風險投資公司。 Alameda Research是欺詐性交易所FTX的姊妹公司，以前是令牌最大的持有人之一。

The disagreement and close vote shows the network isn’t controlled by a single group of likeminded insiders and that those with conflicting opinions and interests are able to influence decision making, community members say.

社區成員說，分歧和近投票表明該網絡不是由一群志趣相投的內部人群控制的，並且那些意見和利益相互矛盾的人能夠影響決策。

“Solana has demonstrated to the world how truly decentralised it is,” Justin Bons, founder of crypto investing fund Cyber Capital, said on X. He supported the proposal.

加密投資基金網絡資本的創始人賈斯汀·鮑恩斯（Justin Bons）在X上說：“索拉納已經向世界證明了它的真正分散。”

A close battle

一場近距離戰鬥

The vote was close. Over 74% of eligible tokens participated.

投票接近。超過74％的合格代幣參加了比賽。

For much of the approximately two-day polling period, votes in favour of cutting token emissions were in the lead. That changed in the final hours as several large players came in against the proposal.

在大約兩天的投票期內，有利於削減令牌排放的投票是領導的。在最後幾個小時內發生了變化，因為幾個大型球員反對該提案。

All Solana validators were eligible to vote. They received votes based on the number of tokens staked through them.

所有的Solana驗證者都有資格投票。他們根據在他們中放置的代幣數量獲得了投票。

Individual Solana token holders weren’t able to vote, but were encouraged to stake their tokens through a validator that planned to vote in line with their beliefs.

單獨的Solana代幣持有人無法投票，但鼓勵通過計劃根據他們的信念進行投票的驗證者來掌握其令牌。

Some validators even chose to sell their votes, and used the proceeds to boost rewards for stakers.

一些驗證者甚至選擇出售他們的選票，並利用收益來提高史塔克人的獎勵。

Staker schism

斯塔克分裂

The results show a pattern in how validators voted.

結果顯示了驗證者如何投票的模式。

Validators with over 500,000 Solana tokens staked overwhelmingly voted in favour of cutting token emission

超過500,000個Solana代幣的驗證者壓倒性地投票支持削減令牌排放

Large validators that make more money from staking don’t have to worry about their margin of profitability as much, Ben Sparango, a former head of strategic business development at the Solana Foundation, said on X.

索拉納基金會（Solana Foundation）的前戰略業務發展負責人本·斯帕朗戈（Ben Sparango）在X上說，從積累中賺更多錢的大型驗證者不必擔心其盈利能力。

Validators with fewer than 500,000 Solana staked mostly voted against the proposal, however.

然而，固定量少於500,000的驗證者大多投票贊成該提案。

“Small validators are overwhelmingly against as they might not be in business under the new regime” Sparango said.

Sparango說：“小型驗證者在新政權下可能不在業務範圍內反對大多數驗證者。”