索拉纳实验室（Solana Labs）删除提案，以降低每年授予Stakers的35亿美元的代币

在一场近距离战斗中，批评者说，削减将意味着剃须刀上存在的小验证器将不再能够获利

On Thursday, Solana stakeholders rejected a proposal to lower the $3.5 billion in tokens granted to stakers each year.

周四，索拉纳（Solana）利益相关者拒绝了一项提议，要求降低每年授予Stakers的35亿美元的代币。

Proposal SIMD-0228 sought to reduce the amount of Solana tokens awarded based on the total amount of tokens staked, and continue to cut the blockchain’s emissions by a flat 15% each year until hitting a base inflation rate of 1.5%.

提案SIMD-0228试图根据固定的代币数量减少授予的Solana代币数量，并继续每年将区块链的排放量减少15％，直到达到1.5％的基本通货膨胀率。

In a close fight, detractors said the cuts would mean small validators existing on razor thin margins would no longer be able to profit, and force them to shut down, which would harm Solana’s decentralisation. The sceptics won the vote.

在一场近距离战斗中，批评者表示，这些削减将意味着在剃须刀边缘上存在的小验证器将不再能够获利，并迫使他们关闭，这会损害索拉纳的权力下放化。怀疑论者赢得了投票。

Validators run the software that processes transactions on the Solana blockchain.

验证者运行在Solana区块链上处理交易的软件。

Despite the proposal’s failure, many in the Solana community are celebrating because the vote represents a historic moment in the network’s decentralised governance.

尽管该提议失败了，但索拉纳社区中的许多人都在庆祝，因为投票代表了该网络分散的治理中的历史性时刻。

“This was a major victory for the Solana ecosystem and its governance process,” Tushar Jain, co-founder of Multicoin Capital, a Solana investor, said online. He was one of the three people behind the proposal.

Solana Investor Multicoin Capital的联合创始人Tushar Jain说：“这是Solana生态系统及其治理过程的重大胜利。”他是该提议背后的三个人之一。

Since its 2020 launch, Solana has rewarded stakers with lucrative token rewards. However, as the portion of rewards stakers earn from other sources, such as transaction tips, increases, many in the community have argued that native staking rewards should be lowered.

自2020年推出以来，索拉纳（Solana）以有利可图的代币奖励向Stakers奖励。但是，随着奖励的一部分从其他来源赚取的奖励，例如交易提示，增加，社区中的许多人认为，应降低本地放入奖励。

Continuously issuing new tokens causes “long-term, continual downward price pressure,” Solana company Helius said in September.

Solana Company Helius在9月表示，不断发行新的代币会导致“长期，持续下降的价格压力”。

Decentralised doubts

分散的怀疑

Solana has for a long time struggled to convince users that it is sufficiently decentralised — in other words, that a patchwork of token holders has the power to intervene in major decisions, and not just rich insiders.

索拉纳（Solana）长期以来一直在努力说服用户足够分散的用户 - 换句话说，象征持有人的拼凑有权干预重大决策，而不仅仅是富有的内部人士。

There are reasons for them to be sceptical. The blockchain was launched by Solana Labs, a for-profit company. By contrast, Bitcoin, often viewed as the gold standard for crypto decentralisation, has no central authority or attached company.

他们有理由持怀疑态度。该区块链是由营利性公司Solana Labs推出的。相比之下，比特币经常被视为加密分散的黄金标准，没有中央权力或附属公司。

Additionally, a whopping 48% of Solana tokens were given to insiders or sold to venture capital firms when the blockchain launched, according to blockchain data platform Messari. Alameda Research, the sister company of fraudulent exchange FTX, was previously among the token’s biggest holders.

此外，据区块链数据平台Messari称，在区块链推出时，将高达48％的Solana代币送给了内部人士或出售给风险投资公司。 Alameda Research是欺诈性交易所FTX的姊妹公司，以前是令牌最大的持有人之一。

The disagreement and close vote shows the network isn’t controlled by a single group of likeminded insiders and that those with conflicting opinions and interests are able to influence decision making, community members say.

社区成员说，分歧和近投票表明该网络不是由一群志趣相投的内部人群控制的，并且那些意见和利益相互矛盾的人能够影响决策。

“Solana has demonstrated to the world how truly decentralised it is,” Justin Bons, founder of crypto investing fund Cyber Capital, said on X. He supported the proposal.

加密投资基金网络资本的创始人贾斯汀·鲍恩斯（Justin Bons）在X上说：“索拉纳已经向世界证明了它的真正分散。”

A close battle

一场近距离战斗

The vote was close. Over 74% of eligible tokens participated.

投票接近。超过74％的合格代币参加了比赛。

For much of the approximately two-day polling period, votes in favour of cutting token emissions were in the lead. That changed in the final hours as several large players came in against the proposal.

在大约两天的投票期内，有利于削减令牌排放的投票是领导的。在最后几个小时内发生了变化，因为几个大型球员反对该提案。

All Solana validators were eligible to vote. They received votes based on the number of tokens staked through them.

所有的Solana验证者都有资格投票。他们根据在他们中放置的代币数量获得了投票。

Individual Solana token holders weren’t able to vote, but were encouraged to stake their tokens through a validator that planned to vote in line with their beliefs.

单独的Solana代币持有人无法投票，但鼓励通过计划根据他们的信念进行投票的验证者来掌握其令牌。

Some validators even chose to sell their votes, and used the proceeds to boost rewards for stakers.

一些验证者甚至选择出售他们的选票，并利用收益来提高史塔克人的奖励。

Staker schism

斯塔克分裂

The results show a pattern in how validators voted.

结果显示了验证者如何投票的模式。

Validators with over 500,000 Solana tokens staked overwhelmingly voted in favour of cutting token emission

超过500,000个Solana代币的验证者压倒性地投票支持削减令牌排放

Large validators that make more money from staking don’t have to worry about their margin of profitability as much, Ben Sparango, a former head of strategic business development at the Solana Foundation, said on X.

索拉纳基金会（Solana Foundation）的前战略业务发展负责人本·斯帕朗戈（Ben Sparango）在X上说，从积累中赚更多钱的大型验证者不必担心其盈利能力。

Validators with fewer than 500,000 Solana staked mostly voted against the proposal, however.

然而，固定量少于500,000的验证者大多投票赞成该提案。

“Small validators are overwhelmingly against as they might not be in business under the new regime” Sparango said.

Sparango说：“小型验证者在新政权下可能不在业务范围内反对大多数验证者。”