用戶意外將其發送到錯誤的地址後，被指控竊取稀有比特幣序的Binance

一名加密用戶最近指責binance錯誤地將其發送到錯誤的錢包地址後，竊取了一個罕見的比特幣序數，引發了病毒式風暴

A crypto user's recent post on X, formerly Twitter, sparked a viral backlash against Binance after he accused the exchange of stealing a rare Bitcoin Ordinal that he had mistakenly sent to the wrong wallet address.

一位加密用戶最近在Twitter上發表的帖子（以前是Twitter）引發了反對Binance的病毒強烈反對，因為他指責交換了他錯誤地發送到錯誤的錢包地址的稀有比特幣序列。

The user had been experimenting with Bitcoin Ordinals, a type of digital collectible similar to NFTs, and had made a picture-based Ordinal.

用戶一直在嘗試比特幣序列，這是一種類似於NFT的數字收藏品，並製作了基於圖片的序列。

In a moment of misjudgment, he sent the collectible to his Binance bitcoin deposit address, despite the exchange clearly stating that only regular BTC should be sent for deposits.

在誤判的那一刻，他將收藏品發送給了他的二元比特幣存款地址，儘管交換清楚地指出，只有常規的BTC才能發送存款。

After realizing his blunder, he contacted Binance support in a panic, hoping to salvage his lost asset. However, the exchange told him that the asset could not be recovered as customer deposits and withdrawals at the exchange are handled through a commingled fund.

意識到自己的失誤後，他驚慌地聯繫了Binance支持，希望能挽救他的損失資產。但是，該交易所告訴他，由於客戶存款和撤回的撤銷是通過混合基金處理的，因此無法收回資產。

This means that all customer deposits get mixed together into a big pool of bitcoin, and when someone requests a withdrawal, Binance sends out random satoshis from the pool.

這意味著所有客戶存款都將其混合到大量的比特幣中，當有人要求提款時，Binance將隨機的Satoshis從游泳池中寄出。

The user was devastated and assumed that the Ordinal was gone forever. However, to his surprise, he later spotted the same collectible listed for sale on Magic Eden, a popular marketplace for digital assets.

用戶被摧毀，並認為該序列永遠消失了。然而，令他驚訝的是，他後來發現了同樣的收藏品在魔術伊甸園（Magic Eden）上出售，這是一個流行的數字資產市場。

The seller was a savvy collector who had been engaging in “sats panning”—a little-known crypto hobby where people search for rare satoshis, the smallest units of bitcoin.

賣方是一位精明的收藏家，他一直在從事“ Sats Panning”，這是一個鮮為人知的加密貨幣愛好，人們在這裡尋找稀有的Satoshis，這是比特幣的最小單位。

Bitcoin Ordinals are tied to specific satoshis, and whoever owns those sats also owns the Ordinals embedded in them.

比特幣序列與特定的satoshis相關，擁有這些SAT的人也擁有嵌入其中的序列。

At large exchanges like Binance, all customer deposits get mixed together into a big pool of bitcoin, known as commingled funds.

在Binance等大型交流中，所有客戶存款都將其混合成一大堆比特幣，被稱為混亂的資金。

When someone requests a withdrawal, Binance sends out random satoshis from the pool, without checking if they are special or rare.

當某人要求撤離時，Binance會從游泳池中散發出隨機的Satoshis，而無需檢查它們是否特別或罕見。

The collector had withdrawn bitcoin from Binance and unknowingly received the sat that contained the lost Ordinal, like winning a digital lottery.

收藏家已經從Binance撤回了比特幣，並在不知不覺中收到了包含失落的序數的SAT，例如贏得數字彩票。

This practice, called sats panning, works like old-school gold panning. Users deposit and withdraw bitcoin repeatedly, hoping to stumble upon rare sats.

這種稱為SAT Panning的練習就像老式的金色Panning一樣。用戶反復存入和提取比特幣，希望偶然發現稀有的SAT。

Sometimes, one of these rare finds gets listed on platforms like Magic Eden, just like what happened in this case.

有時，這些稀有發現之一會在魔術伊甸園等平台上列出，就像在這種情況下發生的事情一樣。

The collector had bought the sat from another user who had gotten it during a regular withdrawal from Binance.

收藏家從另一個用戶那裡購買了SAT，該用戶在定期退出Binance期間獲得了SAT。

A vivid snapshot of the incident, shared by the user and later deleted, showed a private message from a crypto influencer who tried to intervene.

該事件的生動快照是由用戶共享並刪除的，顯示了一個試圖干預的加密影響者的私人信息。

“There’s probably nothing they can do unfortunately. They are a criminal organization who steal from users and then post passive-aggressive messages about it on their blog,” the influencer said.

影響者說：“不幸的是，他們可能無能為力。他們是一個從用戶那裡竊取的犯罪組織，然後在他們的博客上發布有關它的侵入性信息。”

Another X user, who had lost some crypto to a rug pull scam earlier this year, also commented on the post, saying that he wished he had invested in Binance instead.

另一位X用戶今年早些時候失去了一些加密貨幣，他也對該帖子發表了評論，他說他希望自己投資於Binance。

“At least they would have returned the lost crypto after a viral scandal,” the user said.

用戶說：“至少在病毒醜聞之後，他們會歸還丟失的加密貨幣。”

Several X users tagged Binance founder Changpeng Zhao in the post, hoping that he could intervene and help the user get back his lost Ordinal.

幾位X用戶在帖子中標記了Binance創始人Changpeng Zhao，希望他可以乾預並幫助用戶恢復失去的序數。

However, the story took an unexpected turn. The user deleted his post after realizing that he had made a mistake in accusing Binance of wrongdoing.

但是，這個故事發生了意外的轉變。用戶意識到他在指責binance犯有不法行為時犯了一個錯誤，從而刪除了他的帖子。

In a follow-up post, the user explained that he had become angry and frustrated after losing the Ordinal, but he had since learned about sats panning and understood how the lost collectible could be picked up by another user during a regular withdrawal.

在後續帖子中，用戶解釋說，他在失去了序幕後變得生氣和沮喪，但此後他了解了SATS Panning，並理解了在正常撤離期間，另一名用戶如何將失去的收藏品接來。

He also said that he had contacted the seller on Magic Eden and they were aware that the lost Ordinal belonged to the user.

他還說，他已經在Magic Eden上與賣方聯繫，他們知道失去的序數屬於用戶。

The seller had offered to return the collectible, but the user declined as he no longer had any interest in it after the whole incident.

賣方提出要退還收藏品，但是用戶拒絕了，因為他在整個事件後不再對此有任何興趣。

“I'm not sure why they decided to sell it on Magic Eden but I guess they thought they could make some profit from it,” the user said.

用戶說：“我不確定他們為什麼決定在魔術伊甸園出售它，但我想他們認為他們可以從中獲利。”

Despite the amicable resolution, the incident had already sparked a huge discussion on social media, with many users criticizing Binance for its handling of customer assets and lack of transparency.

儘管解決了友好的解決方案，但該事件已經在社交媒體上引發了廣泛的討論，許多用戶批評Binance處理客戶資產和缺乏透明度。

The post was widely shared and discussed on crypto forums and groups, generating a strong reaction from the online community.

該帖子在加密論壇和團體上得到了廣泛的共享和討論，從而產生了在線社區的強烈反應。

Some users expressed disbelief at the exchange’s actions, while others said that it was common knowledge that exchange hot wallets are constantly being used and any deposited assets belong to the exchange until withdrawal is requested.

一些用戶對交易所的行動表示懷疑，而另一些用戶則表示，往常是在不斷使用交換熱錢包，任何存款資產都屬於交易所，直到要求提款為止。

One user said that it was ironic how a crypto exchange, which is supposed to be built on open-chain technology, was handling a collectible like a traditional bank.

一位用戶說，具有諷刺意味的是，應該建立在開放式技術上的加密交易所如何處理像傳統銀行這樣的收藏品。

“They should be making it easier for people to transfer their assets across different platforms, not create obstacles and claim that it's impossible to identify the original sender of a crypto payment,” the user said.

用戶說：“他們應該使人們更容易在不同平台上轉移其資產，而不是造成障礙，並聲稱無法識別加密貨幣的原始發件人。”

Another user said that it was sad to see how a simple mistake could lead to such a complicated situation.

另一位用戶說，很遺憾看到一個簡單的錯誤會導致如此復雜的情況。

“I hope this will encourage more crypto platforms to be responsive and helpful to their users, especially when they encounter difficulties,” the user said.

用戶說：“我希望這將鼓勵更多的加密平台對用戶響應迅速且有用，尤其是在遇到困難時。”

Binanc e did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Binanc E沒有立即回應置評請求。