用户意外将其发送到错误的地址后，被指控窃取稀有比特币序的Binance

一名加密用户最近指责binance错误地将其发送到错误的钱包地址后，窃取了一个罕见的比特币序数，引发了病毒式风暴

A crypto user's recent post on X, formerly Twitter, sparked a viral backlash against Binance after he accused the exchange of stealing a rare Bitcoin Ordinal that he had mistakenly sent to the wrong wallet address.

一位加密用户最近在Twitter上发表的帖子（以前是Twitter）引发了反对Binance的病毒强烈反对，因为他指责交换了他错误地发送到错误的钱包地址的稀有比特币序列。

The user had been experimenting with Bitcoin Ordinals, a type of digital collectible similar to NFTs, and had made a picture-based Ordinal.

用户一直在尝试比特币序列，这是一种类似于NFT的数字收藏品，并制作了基于图片的序列。

In a moment of misjudgment, he sent the collectible to his Binance bitcoin deposit address, despite the exchange clearly stating that only regular BTC should be sent for deposits.

在误判的那一刻，他将收藏品发送给了他的二元比特币存款地址，尽管交换清楚地指出，只有常规的BTC才能发送存款。

After realizing his blunder, he contacted Binance support in a panic, hoping to salvage his lost asset. However, the exchange told him that the asset could not be recovered as customer deposits and withdrawals at the exchange are handled through a commingled fund.

意识到自己的失误后，他惊慌地联系了Binance支持，希望能挽救他的损失资产。但是，该交易所告诉他，由于客户存款和撤回的撤销是通过混合基金处理的，因此无法收回资产。

This means that all customer deposits get mixed together into a big pool of bitcoin, and when someone requests a withdrawal, Binance sends out random satoshis from the pool.

这意味着所有客户存款都将其混合到大量的比特币中，当有人要求提款时，Binance将随机的Satoshis从游泳池中寄出。

The user was devastated and assumed that the Ordinal was gone forever. However, to his surprise, he later spotted the same collectible listed for sale on Magic Eden, a popular marketplace for digital assets.

用户被摧毁，并认为该序列永远消失了。然而，令他惊讶的是，他后来发现了同样的收藏品在魔术伊甸园（Magic Eden）上出售，这是一个流行的数字资产市场。

The seller was a savvy collector who had been engaging in “sats panning”—a little-known crypto hobby where people search for rare satoshis, the smallest units of bitcoin.

卖方是一位精明的收藏家，他一直在从事“ Sats Panning”，这是一个鲜为人知的加密货币爱好，人们在这里寻找稀有的Satoshis，这是比特币的最小单位。

Bitcoin Ordinals are tied to specific satoshis, and whoever owns those sats also owns the Ordinals embedded in them.

比特币序列与特定的satoshis相关，拥有这些SAT的人也拥有嵌入其中的序列。

At large exchanges like Binance, all customer deposits get mixed together into a big pool of bitcoin, known as commingled funds.

在Binance等大型交流中，所有客户存款都将其混合成一大堆比特币，被称为混乱的资金。

When someone requests a withdrawal, Binance sends out random satoshis from the pool, without checking if they are special or rare.

当某人要求撤离时，Binance会从游泳池中散发出随机的Satoshis，而无需检查它们是否特别或罕见。

The collector had withdrawn bitcoin from Binance and unknowingly received the sat that contained the lost Ordinal, like winning a digital lottery.

收藏家已经从Binance撤回了比特币，并在不知不觉中收到了包含失落的序数的SAT，例如赢得数字彩票。

This practice, called sats panning, works like old-school gold panning. Users deposit and withdraw bitcoin repeatedly, hoping to stumble upon rare sats.

这种称为SAT Panning的练习就像老式的金色Panning一样。用户反复存入和提取比特币，希望偶然发现稀有的SAT。

Sometimes, one of these rare finds gets listed on platforms like Magic Eden, just like what happened in this case.

有时，这些稀有发现之一会在魔术伊甸园等平台上列出，就像在这种情况下发生的事情一样。

The collector had bought the sat from another user who had gotten it during a regular withdrawal from Binance.

收藏家从另一个用户那里购买了SAT，该用户在定期退出Binance期间获得了SAT。

A vivid snapshot of the incident, shared by the user and later deleted, showed a private message from a crypto influencer who tried to intervene.

该事件的生动快照是由用户共享并删除的，显示了一个试图干预的加密影响者的私人信息。

“There’s probably nothing they can do unfortunately. They are a criminal organization who steal from users and then post passive-aggressive messages about it on their blog,” the influencer said.

影响者说：“不幸的是，他们可能无能为力。他们是一个从用户那里窃取的犯罪组织，然后在他们的博客上发布有关它的侵入性信息。”

Another X user, who had lost some crypto to a rug pull scam earlier this year, also commented on the post, saying that he wished he had invested in Binance instead.

另一位X用户今年早些时候失去了一些加密货币，他也对该帖子发表了评论，他说他希望自己投资于Binance。

“At least they would have returned the lost crypto after a viral scandal,” the user said.

用户说：“至少在病毒丑闻之后，他们会归还丢失的加密货币。”

Several X users tagged Binance founder Changpeng Zhao in the post, hoping that he could intervene and help the user get back his lost Ordinal.

几位X用户在帖子中标记了Binance创始人Changpeng Zhao，希望他可以干预并帮助用户恢复失去的序数。

However, the story took an unexpected turn. The user deleted his post after realizing that he had made a mistake in accusing Binance of wrongdoing.

但是，这个故事发生了意外的转变。用户意识到他在指责binance犯有不法行为时犯了一个错误，从而删除了他的帖子。

In a follow-up post, the user explained that he had become angry and frustrated after losing the Ordinal, but he had since learned about sats panning and understood how the lost collectible could be picked up by another user during a regular withdrawal.

在后续帖子中，用户解释说，他在失去了序幕后变得生气和沮丧，但此后他了解了SATS Panning，并理解了在正常撤离期间，另一名用户如何将失去的收藏品接来。

He also said that he had contacted the seller on Magic Eden and they were aware that the lost Ordinal belonged to the user.

他还说，他已经在Magic Eden上与卖方联系，他们知道失去的序数属于用户。

The seller had offered to return the collectible, but the user declined as he no longer had any interest in it after the whole incident.

卖方提出要退还收藏品，但是用户拒绝了，因为他在整个事件后不再对此有任何兴趣。

“I'm not sure why they decided to sell it on Magic Eden but I guess they thought they could make some profit from it,” the user said.

用户说：“我不确定他们为什么决定在魔术伊甸园出售它，但我想他们认为他们可以从中获利。”

Despite the amicable resolution, the incident had already sparked a huge discussion on social media, with many users criticizing Binance for its handling of customer assets and lack of transparency.

尽管解决了友好的解决方案，但该事件已经在社交媒体上引发了广泛的讨论，许多用户批评Binance处理客户资产和缺乏透明度。

The post was widely shared and discussed on crypto forums and groups, generating a strong reaction from the online community.

该帖子在加密论坛和团体上得到了广泛的共享和讨论，从而产生了在线社区的强烈反应。

Some users expressed disbelief at the exchange’s actions, while others said that it was common knowledge that exchange hot wallets are constantly being used and any deposited assets belong to the exchange until withdrawal is requested.

一些用户对交易所的行动表示怀疑，而另一些用户则表示，往常是在不断使用交换热钱包，任何存款资产都属于交易所，直到要求提款为止。

One user said that it was ironic how a crypto exchange, which is supposed to be built on open-chain technology, was handling a collectible like a traditional bank.

一位用户说，具有讽刺意味的是，应该建立在开放式技术上的加密交易所如何处理像传统银行这样的收藏品。

“They should be making it easier for people to transfer their assets across different platforms, not create obstacles and claim that it's impossible to identify the original sender of a crypto payment,” the user said.

用户说：“他们应该使人们更容易在不同平台上转移其资产，而不是造成障碍，并声称无法识别加密货币的原始发件人。”

Another user said that it was sad to see how a simple mistake could lead to such a complicated situation.

另一位用户说，很遗憾看到一个简单的错误会导致如此复杂的情况。

“I hope this will encourage more crypto platforms to be responsive and helpful to their users, especially when they encounter difficulties,” the user said.

用户说：“我希望这将鼓励更多的加密平台对用户响应迅速且有用，尤其是在遇到困难时。”

Binanc e did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Binanc E没有立即回应置评请求。