專家小組應對加密貨幣領域攻擊性模因硬幣的興起

Solana 小組討論種族主義 Meme 硬幣 BUIDL Asia 的小組討論探討了帶有種族主義主題的新興 Meme 硬幣的問題。 Solana 的 Austin Federa 強調了錢包應用程式在過濾攻擊性內容方面的作用，而 Aave Chan 的 Marc Zeller 主張根據歐盟法律有過濾義務。討論凸顯了言論自由和內容審核之間的緊張關係，Federa 強調了抵制審查的重要性，以及與更廣泛的加密市場相比，種族主義模因幣所佔的比例很小。

Addressing the Emergence of Meme Coins with Racist Themes: A Panel Discussion

應對帶有種族主義主題的迷因硬幣的出現：小組討論

Amidst the proliferation of meme coins within the cryptocurrency ecosystem, concerns have arisen regarding coins that espouse racist themes. To address this issue, a panel discussion was held at the recently concluded BUIDL Asia summit, inviting stakeholders to engage in a critical debate.

隨著加密貨幣生態系統中模因硬幣的激增，人們對支持種族主義主題的硬幣產生了擔憂。為了解決這個問題，在最近結束的 BUIDL 亞洲峰會上舉行了小組討論，邀請利益相關者進行批判性辯論。

Background: Meme Coins with Offensive Content

背景：帶有攻擊性內容的迷因幣

The cryptocurrency landscape has witnessed a surge in meme coins, with over 1900 emerging in recent times. While many of these coins adopt humorous names and descriptions, a subset has come under scrutiny for using slurs and other offensive language. CoinMarketCap estimates the total market capitalization of all meme coins to be approximately $66.9 billion.

加密貨幣領域見證了模因幣的激增，最近出現了 1900 多種模因幣。雖然其中許多硬幣都採用幽默的名稱和描述，但其中一部分因使用誹謗和其他攻擊性語言而受到審查。 CoinMarketCap 估計所有 Meme 幣的總市值約為 669 億美元。

The Role of Wallet Apps and Decentralized Exchanges

錢包應用程式和去中心化交易所的作用

One of the key questions discussed during the panel was the responsibility of wallet apps and decentralized exchanges (DEXs) in mitigating the spread of racist content. Participants debated whether these platforms should conduct critical reviews of meme coins to identify and filter out those containing banned words. Alternatively, it was argued that nodes should bear the sole burden of blocking such projects.

小組討論期間討論的關鍵問題之一是錢包應用程式和去中心化交易所（DEX）在減少種族主義內容傳播方面的責任。與會者討論了這些平台是否應該對迷因幣進行嚴格審查，以識別和過濾掉那些包含違禁詞的幣。或者，有人認為節點應該承擔阻止此類項目的唯一負擔。

Solana's Perspective: Individual Content Decisions

Solana 的觀點：個人內容決策

Austin Federa, head of strategy at the Solana Foundation, presented the view that wallet developers possess the discretion to incorporate block lists. According to Federa, the majority of wallets in the Solana ecosystem are designed to remove spam NFTs and tokens, granting users the option to access additional content.

Solana 基金會策略主管 Austin Federa 認為，錢包開發者擁有納入封鎖名單的自由裁量權。 Federa 表示，Solana 生態系統中的大多數錢包旨在消除垃圾 NFT 和代幣，讓用戶可以選擇存取其他內容。

Federa emphasized the permissionless nature of cryptocurrency networks, asserting that it would be unreasonable to expect ISPs to censor content deemed offensive by some users. He drew an analogy to the internet, which operates on a similar decentralized basis, allowing users to make individual decisions about the content they consume.

Federa 強調了加密貨幣網路的無需許可的性質，聲稱期望 ISP 審查某些用戶認為具有冒犯性的內容是不合理的。他用互聯網進行了類比，互聯網在類似的去中心化基礎上運行，允許用戶對他們消費的內容做出個人決定。

Counterargument: Legal Obligations and Censorship Resistance

反駁：法律義務和審查制度阻力

Marc Zeller, founder of the Aave Chan Initiative and Aave DAO delegate, challenged Federa's argument by highlighting specific legal obligations to filter content in certain jurisdictions, such as the European Union. Zeller used the example of Holocaust denialism in France, where ISPs are legally compelled to block such content.

Aave Chan Initiative 創辦人兼 Aave DAO 代表 Marc Zeller 對 Federa 的論點提出了質疑，強調了在某些司法管轄區（例如歐盟）過濾內容的具體法律義務。澤勒以法國否認大屠殺的例子為例，根據法律，網路服務供應商必須封鎖此類內容。

Zeller emphasized the importance of prioritizing censorship resistance over eliminating offensive content, stating that different cultures have varying perspectives on this issue. He expressed that the blockchain ethos leans towards supporting free speech and the belief that censorship resistance outweighs the elimination of disagreeable content.

澤勒強調了優先考慮抵制審查制度而不是消除冒犯性內容的重要性，並指出不同的文化對此問題有不同的看法。他表示，區塊鏈精神傾向於支持言論自由，並相信抵制審查比消除令人不快的內容更重要。

Weighing the Impact and Considerations

權衡影響和考慮因素

Federa acknowledged that some nodes and validators may feel obligated to censor certain content based on legal concerns. He cited the recent sanctions imposed on Tornado Cash transactions by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) as an example.

Federa 承認，一些節點和驗證者可能覺得有義務基於法律問題來審查某些內容。他以美國外國資產管制辦公室 (OFAC) 最近對 Tornado Cash 交易實施的製裁為例。

However, Federa downplayed the significance of racist meme coins, arguing that their popularity is relatively minimal compared to the broader benefits offered by the cryptocurrency market. He compared the situation to a hate group garnering headlines despite their limited size and influence, ultimately seeking only attention.

然而，Federa 淡化了種族主義迷因硬幣的重要性，認為與加密貨幣市場提供的更廣泛的好處相比，它們的受歡迎程度相對較小。他將這種情況比作一個仇恨團體，儘管其規模和影響力有限，但仍佔據頭條新聞，最終只尋求關注。

Despite the concerns raised regarding racist meme coins, Solana remains bullish, with its network activity reaching record highs. The filtering solution proposed by Federa is expected to have a minor impact on the overall surge. At the time of writing, SOL traded at $194, having experienced a 4% increase over the past 24 hours, and its market dominance has risen slightly to 3.27%.

儘管人們對種族主義迷因硬幣感到擔憂，但 Solana 仍然看好，其網路活動達到歷史新高。 Federa提出的過濾解決方案預計對整體激增影響較小。截至本文撰寫時，SOL 交易價格為 194 美元，在過去 24 小時內上漲了 4%，其市場主導地位已小幅上升至 3.27%。

The ongoing debate highlights the complexities involved in addressing offensive content within the cryptocurrency ecosystem. While some argue for stricter filtering and censorship, others emphasize the importance of preserving free speech and censorship resistance. The ultimate resolution of this issue will likely evolve as the industry continues to mature and grapple with the challenges of balancing regulatory compliance and individual liberties.

正在進行的爭論凸顯了解決加密貨幣生態系統中的攻擊性內容所涉及的複雜性。雖然有些人主張更嚴格的過濾和審查，但有些人則強調維護言論自由和抵制審查的重要性。隨著行業不斷成熟並努力應對平衡監管合規性和個人自由的挑戰，這個問題的最終解決方案可能會不斷發展。